Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 81, Issue 1–2, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Identification of cubic nonlinearity in disbonded aluminum honeycomb panels using single degree-of-freedom models

  • Eric Dittman
  • Douglas E. Adams
Original Paper

Abstract

Prior work on a disbonded aluminum honeycomb panel showed evidence of a quadratic stiffness nonlinearity, as well as the presence of an unknown cubic nonlinearity. Approximations to higher order nonlinear single degree of freedom (SDOF) models were solved using the method of multiple scales. These approximations were then used to fit displacement data from a sinusoidal excitation test and determine the coefficients of the model as a function of damage size. Confirmation of the quadratic stiffness nonlinearity was achieved through examination of force restoration curves excited at one-half the primary resonance in conjunction with coefficient fitting of the test data to the model. The data were fit against the higher order models to determine whether the cubic nonlinearity could be stiffness or damping related. The coefficient fitting shows that the cubic nonlinearity is a stiffness nonlinearity. This confirmed what was seen in the force restoration curves when the system was excited at one-third the primary resonance. The ability to match the vibratory behavior of the damage to a SDOF model shows that the use of single frequency excitation at lower frequencies can isolate the nonlinear behavior of the damaged area and identify what damage mechanisms may be involved.

Keywords

Nonlinear systems Composite panel damage Quadratic stiffness Cubic stiffness Superharmonic excitation Method of multiple scales 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, D., Allemang, R.: A frequency domain method for estimating the parameters of a non-linear structural dynamic model through feedback. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 14, 637–656 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, D.E.: Frequency domain arx model and multi-harmonic frf estimators for non-linear dynamic systems. J. Sound Vib. 250, 935–950 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andreaus, U., Casini, P., Vestroni, F.: Non-linear dynamics of a cracked cantilever beam under harmonic excitation. Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 42, 566–575 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Billings, S., Jones, J.P.: Mapping non-linear integro-differential equations into the frequency domain. Int. J. Control 52(4), 863–879 (1990)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brush, E.R.: Development of a dynamic model for subsurface daamge in sandwich composites. Master’s thesis, Purdue University (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cantwell, W., Morton, J.: Detection of impact damage in cfrp laminates. Compos. Struct. 3, 241–257 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chu, Y., Shen, M.: Analysis of forced bilinear oscillators and the application to cracked beam dynamics. AIAA 30(10), 2512–2519 (1992)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dittman, E., Adams, D.: Detection and quantification of a disbonded aluminum honeycomb panel using nonlinear superharmonic frequencies. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 2013, Palo Alto, CA (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gandhi, F., Chopra, I.: A time-domain non-linear viscoelastic damper model. Smart Mater. Struct. 5, 517–528 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanneke, E., Reifsnider, K., Stinchcomb, W.: Thermography, and ndi method for damage detection. J. Metals 31, 11–15 (1979)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Masri, S., Caughey, T.: A nonparametric identification technique for nonlinear dynamic problems. J. Appl. Mech. 46, 433–447 (1979)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Masri, S., Caughey, T., Miller, R., Saud, A.: Identification of nonlinear vibrating structures: part i—formulation. J. Appl. Mech. 54, 918–922 (1987)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masri, S., Caughey, T., Miller, R., Saud, A.: Identification of nonlinear vibrating structures: part ii—applications. J. Appl. Mech. 54, 923–929 (1987)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masri, S., Caughey, T., Sassi, H.: Nonparametric identification of nearly arbitrary nonlinear systems. J. Appl. Mech. 49, 619–628 (1982)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nayfeh, A.H.: Problems in Perturbation. Wiley, New York (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nayfeh, A.H., Mook, D.T.: Nonlinear Oscilations. Wiley, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruotolo, R., Surace, C., Crespo, P., Storer, D.: Harmonic analysis of the vibrations of a cantilevered beam with a closing crack. Comput. Struct. 61, 1057–1074 (1996)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsyfansky, S., Beresnevich, V.: Non-linear vibration method for detection of fatigue cracks in aircraft wings. J. Sound Vib. 236, 49–60 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Underwood, S.S., Adams, D.: Composite damage detection using laser vibrometry with nonlinear response characteristics. In: Proulx, T. (ed.) Nonlinear Modeling and Applications, vol. 2, pp 181–187. Springer, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Volterra, V.: Theory of Functionals and Integral Equations. Dover Publications, New York, NY (1959)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Purdue Center for Systems IntegrityPurdue UniversityLafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringVanderbuilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations