Functional characteristics of additional positive feedback in genetic circuits
- 300 Downloads
Multiple-positive feedback circuits are ubiquitous regulatory motifs in complex bio-molecular networks. A popular topic is why multiple-positive feedback mechanisms have been evolved and selected by organisms. To this end, a two-component dual-positive feedback genetic circuit is investigated, which consists of an auto-activation loop and a double negative feedback circuit. The auto-activation loop acts as an additional positive feedback loop (APFL), and our aim is to explore the functional characteristics of the APFL. Investigations reveal that the APFL can regulate the size of bistable region and the robust attractiveness of stable steady states. It is also found that the APFL can regulate global relative input–output sensitivities of the system. Furthermore, the APFL can tune the response speed, noise resistance and stochastic switch behavior of the system, which makes it easy to realize functional tunability and robust decision-making. Therefore, rationalizing why multiple-positive feedback circuits so frequently appear in real-world biological systems. Potential applications of the associated investigations include the design of artificial genetic circuits, the modeling and model reduction for large-scale bio-molecular networks.
KeywordsGenetic regulatory network Additional positive feedback Bifurcation Signal processing Bistable switch
The authors would like to thank Profs. Tianshou Zhou and Xiaoqun Wu for their valuable comments. This work is supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China under Grant 2014ZX10004-001-014, the 973 Project under Grant 2014CB845302, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61304151, 11105040, 61025017, 11472290, the Australia ARC Discovery Grants DP130104765, the Science Foundation of Henan University under Grants 2012YBZR007.
- 1.Alon, U.: An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2007)Google Scholar
- 40.Wang, P., Lü, J., Zhang, Y., Ogorzalek, M. J.: Global relative input–output sensitivities of the feed-forward loops in genetic networks. In: Proceedings of the 31th Chinese Control Conference, July 25–27, 7376–7381 (2012)Google Scholar
- 43.Gonze, D., Halloy, J., Goldbeter, A.: Deterministic versus stochastic models for circadian rhythms. J. Biol. Phys. 28, 637–653 (2002)Google Scholar
- 45.Wang, P., Lü, J., Wan, L., Chen, Y.: A stochastic simulation algorithm for biochemical reactions with delays. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Biol. Aug. 23–25, 109–114 (2013)Google Scholar
- 47.Zheng X, Yang X, Tao Y.: Bistability, probability transition rate and first-passage time in an autoactivating positive-feedback loop. PLoS One 6, e1704 (2011)Google Scholar
- 50.Wang, P., Lü, J., Zhang, Y., Ogorzalek, M.J.: Intrinsic noise induced state transition in coupled positive and negative feedback genetic circuit. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Biol. Sep. 2–4, 356–361 (2011)Google Scholar
- 51.Liu, H., Yan, F., Liu, Z.: Oscillatory dynamics in a gene regulatory network mediated by small RNA with time delay. Nonlinear Dyn. 76, 147–159 (2014)Google Scholar