Advertisement

Nonlinear Dynamics

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 575–595 | Cite as

Analysis of a frictional oblique impact observed in skew bridges

  • Elias G. Dimitrakopoulos
Original Paper

Abstract

The oblique contact/impact of skew bridges triggers a unique rotational mechanism which earthquake reconnaissance reports correlate with deck unseating of such bridges. Building on the work of other researchers, the present study adopts a fully non-smooth rigid body approach and set-valued force laws, in order to analyze in depth this oblique multi-impact phenomenon. A linear complementarity formulation is proposed which yields a great variety of (multi-) impact states, depending on the initial (pre-impact) conditions, such as “slip” or “stick” at one corner (single-impact) or two corners (double-impact) of the body. The pertinent existential conditions of those impact states reveal a complex dynamic behavior. With respect to the rotational mechanism associated with double-impact, the physically feasible impact states as well as, counter-intuitive exceptions are recognized. The study proves that double oblique impact, both frictionless and frictional, may or may not produce rotation of the body and proposes criteria that distinguish each case. Most importantly, it is shown that the tendency of skew bridges to rotate (and hence unseat) after deck-abutment collisions is not a factor of the skew angle alone, but rather of the overall geometry in-plan, plus the impact parameters (coefficient of restitution and coefficient of friction). The study also provides a theoretical justification of the observed tendency of skew bridges to jam at the obtuse corner and rotate in such a way that the skew angle increases. Finally, counter-intuitive trends hidden in the response are unveiled which indicate that, due to friction, a skew bridge may also rotate so that the skew angle decreases.

Oblique impact Friction Unilateral contact Complementarity Skew bridges Concrete bridges 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dimitrakopoulos, E.G., Kappos, A.J., Makris, N.: Dimensional analysis of yielding and pounding structures for records without distinct pulses. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29(7), 1170–1180 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dimitrakopoulos, E.G., Makris, N., Kappos, A.J.: Dimensional analysis of the earthquake response of a pounding oscillator. ASCE J. Eng. Mech. (2009, in press) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dimitrakopoulos, E.G., Makris, N., Kappos, A.J.: Dimensional analysis of the earthquake induced pounding between adjacent structures. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38(7), 867–886 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    EERL (Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory): Engineering features of the San Fernando earthquake of February 9, 1971. In: Jennings, P.C. (ed.) EERL 71-02 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena (1971) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., Calvi, G.M.: Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges. Wiley, New York (1996) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    EERI: The Tehuacan, Mexico, Earhtquake of June 15, 1999. Special Earthquake Rep. September 1999 EERI, Oakland (1999) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, S.H.: GIS-based regional risk analysis approach for bridges against earthquakes. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo (1993) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maragakis, E., Jennings, P.C.: Analytical models for the rigid body motions of skew bridges. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 15, 923–944 (1987) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maleki, S.: Seismic modeling of skewed bridges with elastomeric bearings and side retainers. ASCE J. Bridge Eng. 10(4), 442–449 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moreau, J.J.: Unilateral contact and dry friction in finite freedom dynamics. In: Moreau, J.J., Panagiotopoulos, P.D. (eds.) Non-Smooth Mechanics and Applications, CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 302, pp. 1–82 Springer, New York (1988) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Panagiotopoulos, P.D.: Dynamic and incremental variational inequality principles, differential inclusions and their applications to co-existent phases problems. Acta Mech. 40, 85–107 (1981) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panagiotopoulos, P.D.: Noncovex energy functions. Hemivariational inequalities and substationary principles. Acta Mech. 48, 111–130 (1983) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glocker, C.: Set-Valued Force Laws. Springer, Berlin (2001) MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brogliato, B.: Nonsmooth Mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, London (1999) MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leine, R.I., van Campen, D.H., Glocker, C.: Nonlinear dynamics and modeling of various wooden toys with impact and friction. J. Vib. Control 9, 25–78 (2003) MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Payr, M., Glocker, C.: Oblique frictional impact of a bar: analysis and comparison of different impact laws. Nonlinear Dyn. 41, 361–383 (2005) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brogliato, B., ten Dam, A.A., Paoli, L., Ge’not, F., Abadie, M.: Numerical simulation of finite dimensional multibody nonsmooth mechanical systems. Appl. Mech. Rev. 55(2), 107–150 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pfeiffer, F.: Nonsmooth dynamics in engineering. In: Nonsmooth/Nonconvex Mechanics with Applications in Engineering, II. NNMAE—Proceedings of the International Conference. In MEMORIAM of Professor P.D. Panagiotopoulos, 7–8 July 2006, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 295–306 (2006) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwack, B.M., Lee, S.S.: A complementarity problem formulation for two-dimensional frictional contact problems. Comput. Struct. 28, 469–480 (1988) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klarbring, A., Bjrrkman, G.: A mathematical programming approach to contact problem with friction and varying contact surface. Comput. Struct. 30, 1185–1198 (1988) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pfeiffer, F., Glocker, C.: Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts. Wiley, New York (1996) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations