Comparative research on semi-active control strategies for magneto-rheological suspension
- 994 Downloads
This paper presents the comparison results of a study to identify an appropriate semi-active control algorithm for a MR suspension system from a variety of semi-active control algorithms for use with MR dampers. Five representative control algorithms are considered including the skyhook controller, the hybrid controller, the LQG controller, the sliding mode controller and the fuzzy logic controller. To compare the control performances of the five control algorithms, a quarter car model with a MR damper is adopted as the baseline model for our analysis. After deriving the governing motion equations of the proposed dynamic model, five controllers are developed. Then each control policy is applied to the baseline model equipped with a MR damper. The performances of each control algorithm under various road conditions are compared along with the equivalent passive model in both time and frequency domains through the numerical simulation. Subsequently, a road test is performed to validate the actual control performance. The results show that the performance of a MR suspension system is highly dependent on the choice of algorithm employed, and the sliding mode control strategy exhibits an excellent integrated performance.
KeywordsSkyhook Hybrid LQG Sliding mode control Fuzzy logic control Magneto-rheological suspension
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Hassan, S.A., Sharp, R.S.: The relative performance capability of passive, active and semi-active car suspension systems. SAE technical paper series 864901 (1986) Google Scholar
- 6.Lee, H.S., Choi, S.B.: Control and response characteristics of a magneto-rheological fluid damper for passenger vehicles. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 11(1), 80–87 (2000) Google Scholar
- 9.Crosby, M.J., Harwood, R.A., Karnopp, D.: Vibration control using semi-active force generators. Lord Library of Technical Articles LL-7004 (1973) Google Scholar
- 12.Wang, E.R., Ma, X.Q., Rakheja, S., Su, C.Y.: Semi-active control of vehicle vibration with MR-dampers. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Maui, HI, December (2003) Google Scholar
- 19.Fang, X., Chen, W., Wu, L., Wang, Q., Fan, D., Li, Z.: Fuzzy control technology and the application to vehicle semi-active suspension. Chinese J. Mech. Eng. 35(3), 98–100 (1999) Google Scholar
- 20.Dong, X.M., Liao, C.R., Chen, W.M., Zhang, H.H., Huang, S.L.: Adaptive fuzzy neural network control for transient dynamics of magneto-rheological suspension with time-delay. In: Adv. Neural Netw. ISNN 2006, Pt. 2, Proc. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3972, pp. 1046–1051. Springer, Berlin (2006) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Yang, J.W., Li, J., Du, Y.P.: Adaptive fuzzy control of lateral semi-active suspension for high-speed railway vehicle. In: Comput. Intell., Pt. 2, Proc. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4114, pp. 1104–1115. Springer, Berlin (2006) Google Scholar
- 26.Ahmadian, M.: A hybrid semi-active control for secondary suspension applications. In: ASME International Congress and Exposition, November 16–21, Dallas, TX (1997) Google Scholar
- 27.Yokoyama, M., Hendrick, J.K., Toyama, S.: A model following sliding mode controller for semi-active suspension systems with MR dampers. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference Arlington, VA, June 25–27, pp. 2652–2657 (2001) Google Scholar
- 28.Zhao, H., Lu, S.: A vehicle’s time domain model with road input on four wheels. Automot. Eng. 21(2), 112–117 (1999) Google Scholar