Abstract
The spread of false and misleading information through online social media is an elevated concern in emergency contexts such as natural disasters, where the on-the ground decision-making window is shorter, and the stakes can be particularly high. Misinformation that gets attention and is drawn out longer during and after such disasters potentially puts the affected population at additional risk. This research focuses on popular but ambiguous and contentious narratives transmitted via Twitter during Hurricane Harvey. Two most talked about contentious narratives consisted of (1) government agencies putting undocumented immigrants at risk and (2) decisions about evacuation. They depict the process of debunking, competing narratives, and political ideology that have kept the stories alive. Our findings suggest the following: that government and reporters play important roles in stemming the spread of contentious or false information; ambiguous and contentious narratives remain in the conversation longer, specific debunking works faster and reaches a larger audience than general or confused debunking; and the lack of coordination of messaging online and on the ground as well as among different government agencies may threaten the timely and accurate delivery of disaster responses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah NA, Nishioka D, Tanaka Y, Murayama Y (2017) Why I retweet? Exploring user’s perspective on decision-making of information spreading during disasters. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences
Alam F, Ofli F, Imran M, Aupetit M (2018) A twitter tale of three Hurricanes: Harvey, Irma, and Maria. ArXiv:1805.05144 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.05144
Andrews CA, Fichet ES, Ding Y, Spiro ES, Starbird K (2016) Keeping up with the tweet-dashians: the impact of official- accounts on online rumoring. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing-CSCW’16, pp 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819986
Arif A, Shanahan K, Chou FJ, Dosouto Y, Starbird K, Spiro E (2016) How information snowballs: exploring the role of exposure in online rumor propagation. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing-CSCW’16, pp 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819964
Babcock M, Beskow DM, Carley KM (2019) Different faces of false: the spread and curtailment of false information in the black panther twitter discussion. J Data Inf Quality 11(4):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3339468
Bovet A, Makse HA (2019) Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nat Commun 10(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2
Chen R, Sakamoto Y (2013) Perspective matters: sharing of crisis information in social media. In: 2013 46th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 2033–2041. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.447
Chen S, Mao J, Li G, Ma C, Cao Y (2019) Uncovering sentiment and retweet patterns of disaster-related tweets from a spatiotemporal perspective–a case study of Hurricane Harvey. Telematics Inform 47:101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101326
CNN (2017) https://twitter.com/CNN/status/901151899503607809
Conroy NJ, Rubin VL, Chen Y (2015) Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news: automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. Proc As Inf Sci Technol 52(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082
Dailey D, Starbird K (2014). Visible skepticism: community vetting after Hurricane Irene. In: ISCRAM
Darr JP, Cate SD, Moak DS (2019) Who’ll stop the rain? repeated disasters and attitudes toward government. Soc Sci Q. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12633
Ghenai A, Mejova Y (2017) Catching zika fever: application of crowdsourcing and machine learning for tracking health misinformation on twitter. ArXiv:1707.03778 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03778
Grinberg N, Joseph K, Friedland L, Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D (2019) Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363(6425):374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706
Guess A, Nagler J, Tucker J (2019) Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Sci Adv 5(1):eaau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
Huang B, Carley KM (2020) Discover your social identity from what you tweet: a content based approach. ArXiv:2003.01797 [Cs]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42699-6
Hughes AL, St. Denis LAA, Palen L, Anderson KM (2014) Online public communications by police & fire services during the 2012 Hurricane Sandy. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems-CHI’14, pp 1505–1514. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557227
Hunt K, Wang B, Zhuang J (2020) Misinformation debunking and cross-platform information sharing through Twitter during Hurricanes Harvey and Irma: a case study on shelters and ID checks. Nat Hazards 103(1):861–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04016-6
Hurricane Harvey Preparations. C-SPAN.org (2017). https://www.c-span.org/video/?433119-1/texas-governor-briefs-reporters-hurricane-harveypreparations. Retrieved on November 24, 2020
KHOU (2017) https://www.khou.com/video/news/local/hurricane-harvey-mayor-turner-judge-ed-emmett-give-updates/285-2701278
Lazer DMJ, Baum MA, Benkler Y, Berinsky AJ, Greenhill KM, Menczer F, Metzger MJ, Nyhan B, Pennycook G, Rothschild D, Schudson M, Sloman SA, Sunstein CR, Thorson EA, Watts DJ, Zittrain JL (2018) The science of fake news. Science 359(6380):1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Liu X, Nourbakhsh A, Li Q, Fang R, Shah S (2015) Real-time rumor debunking on twitter. In: Proc ACM int on conference on information and knowledge management, pp 1867–1870
Liu W, Lai C-H, Xu WW (2018) Tweeting about emergency: a semantic network analysis of government organizations’ social media messaging during Hurricane Harvey. Public Relations Rev 44(5):807–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.009
Manning C, Raghavan P, Schuetze H (2009) Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mosinzova V, Fabian B, Ermakova T, Baumann A (2019) Fake news, conspiracies and myth debunking in social media—a literature survey across disciplines. SSRN Electr J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3328022
Mourão RR, Robertson CT (2019) Fake news as discursive integration: an analysis of sites that publish false, misleading, hyperpartisan and sensational information. J Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1566871
NOAA (2018) Costliest U.S. tropical cyclones tables updated. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/news/UpdatedCostliest.pdf
NOAA (2019) Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: table of events | national centers for environmental information (NCEI). https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/events/US/1980-2017
Shin J, Jian L, Driscoll K, Bar F (2018) The diffusion of misinformation on social media: temporal pattern, message, and source. Comput Hum Behav 83:278–287
Sobel RS, Leeson PT (2006) Government’s response to Hurricane Katrina: a public choice analysis. Public Choice 127(1–2):55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-7730-3
Starbird K, Dailey D, Mohamed O, Lee G, Spiro ES (2018) Engage early, correct more: how journalists participate in false rumors online during crisis events. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems-CHI’18, pp 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173679
Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
Zannettou S, Sirivianos M, Blackburn J, Kourtellis N (2019) The web of false information: rumors, fake news, hoaxes, clickbait, and various other shenanigans. J Data Inf Quality 11(3):1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309699
Zeng L, Starbird K, Spiro ES (2016) Rumors at the speed of light? Modeling the rate of rumor transmission during crisis. In: Proc Hawaii int conference on system sciences (HICSS), pp 1969–1978
Zubiaga A, Ji H (2014) Tweet but verify: epistemic study of information verification on twitter. Soc Netw Anal Min 4:163
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest presented in this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheong, SM., Babcock, M. Attention to misleading and contentious tweets in the case of Hurricane Harvey. Nat Hazards 105, 2883–2906 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04430-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04430-w