Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative study on flash flood hazard assessment for Nam Ou River Basin, Lao PDR

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laos is a mountainous, rainy and less developed country in Southeast Asia. In Laos, floods represent a major constraint on social economic development, causing a large number of casualties and property losses each year, among which the impact from flash floods is also very prominent. Especially in recent decades, with the development of social economy and the intensification of hydropower development, the serious threat from flash floods is becoming more and more obvious. However, there is no fundamental defence system for flash floods been established yet in this country, and the basic knowledge on local flash flood development is also ignored. For filling this gap, taking the Nam Ou River Basin as an example, this paper tries to find out the most helpful hazard assessment method for current Laos based on comparative analysis from the flash flood potential index, the calculation of curve number–rainfall erosivity and the extrapolation method. The results show that the extrapolation method based on spatial lag model constructed by the data from Yunnan, China, presents the most reliable outcome compared with the other two methods, indicating the spatial autocorrelation model can also be useful for extrapolation, effectively. Besides, the scale effect of different potential impact elements on flash flood, i.e. the spatial correlation between each element and the distribution of flash flood events at different spatial statistic units, was also preliminary studied. It is found that the degree of correlation in spatial analysis depends on the short board effect, i.e. only the element that restricts the regional flash flood developmental system can be the key factor. The correlations of most watershed elements increase or decrease directly with the rise of watershed scale, and the values of coefficients tend to be stable at large watershed scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander DE (1993) Natural disasters. UCL Press Limited, London, pp 1–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dodrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley S, Ashley W (2008) Flood fatalities in the United States. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:806–818

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar NR, French MN, Kyiamah GK (2000) Characterization of flash floods in Eastern Kentucky. J Hydrol Eng 5(3):327–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borga M et al (2011) Flash flood forecasting, warning and risk management: the HYDRATE project. Environ Sci Policy 14:834–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research (2018) Comprehensive planning of the Nam Ou River Basin in Laos, report for the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection, Lao PDR

  • Chinese Flood Control and Drought Relief Headquarters (2013) Bulletin on flood and drought disasters in China in 2013. China Water and Power Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Costache R (2019a) Flash-flood potential assessment in the upper and middle sector of Prahova river catchment (Romania). A comparative approach between four hybrid models. Sci Total Environ 659:1115–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costache R (2019b) Flash-flood Potential Index mapping using weights of evidence, decision Trees models and their novel hybrid integration. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 33:1375–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costache R, Zaharia L (2017) Flash-flood potential assessment and mapping by integrating the weights-of-evidence and frequency ratio statistical methods in GIS environment–case study: Basca Chiojdului River catchment (Romania). J Earth Syst Sci 126:59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0828-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water Resources (2016) Nam Ou River Basin profile, Vientiane, Lao PDR

  • Du J, Xiao X, Cai DM et al (2015) Hazard assessment of mountain torrent debris flow in Wenchuan seismic area. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 32(3):77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Ren HY, Zhang PC et al (2016) Comparative study of the hazard assessment of mountain torrent disasters in macro scale. J Catastrophol 31(03):66–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimian M, See LF, Ismail MH et al (2009) Application of natural resources conservation service–curve number method for runoff estimation with GIS in the Kardeh watershed, Iran. Eur J Sci Res 34:575–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Esri (1995–2010) Arcgis 10 help, USA

  • Florax RJ, Rey SJ (1995) The impacts of misspecified spatial interaction in linear regression models. In: Anselin L, Florax RJGM (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan JJ, Sun HY, Huang RQ et al (2012) Study on mechanism of formation and river blocking of Hongchuangou Giant Debris Flow at Yingxiu of Wenchuan County. J Catastrophol 27(1):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgakakos KP (1986) On the design of national, real-time warning systems with capability for site-specific, flash flood forecasts. Bull Am Meteor Soc 67(10):1233–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA (1996) Some guidelines for specifying the geographic weights matrix contained in spatial statistical models. In: Arlinghaus SL (ed) Practical handbook of spatial statistics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley J (2002) Report for 2002TX58B: real-time distributed runoff estimation using NEXRAD precipitation data. Retrieved 2003. http://twri.tamu.edu/docs/funding/usgs/2002-03/hadley.pdf

  • Helalia AM (1993) The relation between soil infiltration and effective porosity in different soils. Agric Water Manag 24(8):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helalia AM, Letey J, Graham RC (1988) Crust formation and clay migration effects on infiltration rate. Soil Sci Soc Am 52:251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam SN, Quattrochi DA (1992) On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in the mapping sciences. Prof Geogr 44(1):88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Chen QD, Kang ZC (1979) A study on the mudflow of the Jiangjia Ravine, Dongchuan District, Yunnan Province. Acta Geogr Sin 34(2):156–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin DJ, Zhen ZC, Zhang XZ et al (2016) Characteristic and influencing factors of soil infiltration of different land use patterns. J Soil Water Conserv 24(1):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu CZ, Miao TB, Chen HQ et al (2011) Basic feature and origin of the “8·8” mountain torrent-debris flow disaster happened in Zhouqu County, Gansu, China, Aug. 8, 2010. Geol Bull China 30(1):141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo ZF, Pu DC, Xie HB et al (2011) Landslide hazard evaluation in debris flow catchment area based on GIS and information method. China Saf Sci J 21(11):144–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchi L et al (2010) Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management. J Hydrol 394(1–2):118–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q, Cieszewski CJ, Madden M et al (2007) K nearest neighbor methods for forest inventory using remote sensing data. GISci Remote Sens 44(2):149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Weather Service. NWS glossary. http://w1.weather.gov/glossary/index.php

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds, TR-55. US Department of Agriculture

  • Plate EJ (2007) Early warning and flood forecasting for large rivers with the lower Mekong as example. J Hydroenviron Res 1(2):80–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Saharia M, Kirstetter PE, Vergara H et al (2017) Mapping flash flood severity in the United States. J Hydrometeorol 18(2):397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan XZ, Wei YQ, Yan HJ et al (1998) Influence of organic matter content on soil hydrodynamic parameters. Acta Pedol Sin 35(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpley AN, Williams JR (1990) EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 1768, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Shi CX (2008) Scaling effects on sediment yield in the upper Yangtze River. Geogr Res 4:800–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GE (2010) Development of a flash flood potential index using physiographic data sets within a geographic information system. Dissertations & Theses-Gradworks

  • Soil Conservation Service (1972) SCS national engineering handbook, section 4 hydrology. Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

  • Stanimir K, Slavoljub D, Tomislav S et al (2017) Torrential flood prevention in the Kolubara river basin. J Mt Sci 14(11):2230–2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su PC, Wei FQ, Xie T et al (2012) Causal analysis of debris flow on August 18, 2010 in Gongshan, Yunnan Province and its harm to the development and utilization of mineral resources. Resour Sci 34(7):1248–1256

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Tie YB (2009) Reconnaissance and analysis on the rainstorm induced debris flow in Weijiagou Valley of Beichuan City after the Wenchuan Earthquake. Mt Res 27(5):625–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler W (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46(Supplement):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Lai C, Chen X et al (2015) Flood hazard risk assessment model based on random forest. J Hydrol 527:1130–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Resource and Environment Administration (2008) National water profile, Vientiane, Lao PDR

  • Xiong JN, Li J, Chen WM et al (2019) Spatial–temporal distribution and the influencing factors of mountain flood disaster in southwest China. Acta Geogr Sin 74(7):1374–1391

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu JX, Yan YX (2005) Scale effects on specific sediment yield in the Yellow River basin and geomorphological explanations. J Hydrol 307:219–2321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pradham B, Hassan AM (2011) Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environ Earth Sci 62(3):611–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaharia L, Costache R, Prăvălie R et al (2015) Assessment and mapping of flood potential in the Slănic catchment in Romania. J Earth Syst Sci 124(6):1311–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeleňáková M, Gaňová L, Purcz P et al (2015) Methodology of flood risk assessment from flash floods based on hazard and vulnerability of the river basin. Nat Hazards 79(3):2055–2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z, Tang G, Long D et al (2016) A cascading flash flood guidance system: development and application in Yunnan Province, China. Nat Hazards 84(3):2071–2093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MD, Li M, Dai CR et al (2016) Simulation study of flood in Yunnan based on the flood area model. J Catastrophol 31(1):78–82

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been sponsored by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1505201), the program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41501109, 41902300) and the Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology (Grant No. SKLGP2019K001). We are grateful to Silvan Ragettli, a researcher from hydrosolutions ltd, Zurich, Switzerland, for suggestions and guidance of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center on Mountain Torrent and Geologic Disaster Prevention of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, No. 23, Huangpu Road, Jiang-an District, Wuhan, 430010, People’s Republic of China

    Jun Du, Zhong-jie Fan & Jian Pu

  2. Chengdu University of Technology, State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu, 610059, China

    Zhong-jie Fan

Authors
  1. Jun Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhong-jie Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jian Pu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Du.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, J., Fan, Zj. & Pu, J. Comparative study on flash flood hazard assessment for Nam Ou River Basin, Lao PDR. Nat Hazards 102, 1393–1417 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03972-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03972-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation