Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Social vulnerability change assessment: monitoring longitudinal demographic indicators of disaster risk in Germany from 2005 to 2015

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social vulnerability assessments of disaster risks related to natural or man-made hazards have become state of the art, while not undisputed. One critique—that most assessments are static—is addressed here by analysing indicators over a 10-year period at a research area in Germany using county-level administrative units. The indicators (and an index) are displayed as maps using publicly available statistical data from a single government source to establish consistency. In addition, maps of changes in indicator values per 5 or 10 years are visualised. As a result, spatial regions within Germany that have received increases in, for instance, higher numbers of elderly citizens can be visualised. Maps visualise the increasing susceptibility to hazards such as floods, heatwaves, storms or technological accidents. At the same time, increases or decreases in capacities, such as hospital density or care homes, highlight regions that have adjusted or still have to adjust to demographic change demands. The main purpose of this paper is to test stability and heterogeneity of indicators over time and offer advice on a selection of indicators that are not only based on static and singular assessments but also take dynamics and related richness of additional temporal change information into account for longitudinal monitoring of disaster risk with a focus on vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • adelphi, PRC, EURAC (2015) Vulnerabilität Deutschlands gegenüber dem Klimawandel Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt

  • Adger WN (1999) Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and Extremes in Coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27:249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Kelly PM (1999) Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and the Architecture of Entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. September 01;4:253-266

  • Andrew MK, Mitnitski AB, Rockwood K (2008) Social Vulnerability, Frailty and Mortality in Elderly People. PLoS ONE 3:e2232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankoff G (2001) Rendering the World Unsafe: Vulnerability‘as Western Discourse. Disasters. 25:19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J, Lambert S, Fry I (2008) The hazards of indicators: insights from the environmental vulnerability index. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 98:102–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBSR–Bundesinstitut für Bau- S-uR (2018) Raumordnungsbericht 2017. Daseinsvorsorge sichern Bonn

  • Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk—Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohle HG, Downing TE, Watts MJ (1994) Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Glob Environ Change 4:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa L, Kropp JP (2013) Linking components of vulnerability in theoretic frameworks and case studies. Sustain Sci 8:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:2301–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damm M (2008) A socio-ecological vulnerability assessment for Germany. In: Simonovic SP, Bourget PG, Blanchard SF (eds) Proceedings of the proceedings of the 4th international symposium on flood defence 6–8 may 2008 managing flood risk, reliability & vulnerability; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Toronto

  • de Sherbinin A (2014) Mapping the unmeasurable? Spatial analysis of vulnerability to climate change and climate variability Enschede: University of Twente

  • Depietri Y, Welle T, Renaud FG (2013) Social vulnerability assessment of the Cologne urban area (Germany) to heat waves: links to ecosystem services. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 6:98–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection, Official Journal of the European Union, pp 75-82

  • Eurostat (2018) Almost half the unemployed at risk of monetary poverty in the EU http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20180226-1?inheritRedirect=true&redirect=%2Feurostat%2Fde%2Fhome

  • Fekete A (2009a) The interrelation of social vulnerability and demographic change in Germany. Paper accepted for the IHDP OpenMeeting 2009

  • Fekete A (2009b) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete A (2010a) Assessment of social vulnerability for river-floods in Germany University of Bonn

  • Fekete A (2010b) Assessment of social vulnerability to river-floods in Germany. UNU-EHS graduate series, vol 4, Bonn. ISBN: 978-3-939923-48-0

  • Fekete A (2012a) Safety and security target levels: opportunities and challenges for risk management and risk communication. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete A (2012b) Spatial disaster vulnerability and risk assessments: challenges in their quality and acceptance. Nat Hazards 61:1161–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete A, Hufschmidt G (eds) (2016) Atlas der Verwundbarkeit und Resilienz—Pilotausgabe zu Deutschland, Österreich, Liechtenstein und Schweiz; Köln & Bonn| Atlas of Vulnerability and Resilience—Pilot version for Germany, Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. Cologne & Bonn

  • Fekete A, Damm M, Birkmann J (2010) Scales as a challenge for vulnerability assessment. Nat Hazards 55:729–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendrich K, Hoffmann W (2007) More than just aging societies: the demographic change has an impact on actual numbers of patients. J Public Health 15:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche K, Schneiderbauer S, Bubeck P, Kienberger S, Buth M, Zebisch M, Kahlenborn W (2014) Vulnerability sourcebook—guidelines for assessments. Bonn and Eschborn

  • Geipel R (1982) Disaster and Reconstruction: Friuli, Italy—The Earthquakes of 1976: Allen & Unwin

  • German Federal Office of Cartography (2017) Verwaltungsgebiete von Deutschland. www.bkg.bund.de

  • German Federal Office of Statistics (2017) Regionaldatenbank Deutschland. https://www.regionalstatistik.de/genesis/online/

  • Gibson C, Clark C, Ostrom E, Ahn T-K (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Government (1996) The president’s commission on critical infrastructure protection (PCCIP), executive order 13010. Washington DC

  • Hamm I, Seitz H, Werding M (eds) (2008) Demographic change in Germany. The economic and fiscal consequences. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Heesen J, Lorenz DF, Nagenborg M, Wenzel B, Voss M (2014) blind spots on Achilles’ Heel: the limitations of vulnerability and resilience mapping in research. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt K (1983) Interpretations of calamity: from the viewpoint of human ecology (The Risks & Hazards Series, 1) Winchester: Allen & Unwin Inc

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller S, Atzl A (2014) Mapping natural hazard impacts on road infrastructure—the extreme precipitation in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, June 2013. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5:227–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King D (2001) Uses and limitations of socioeconomic indicators of community vulnerability to natural hazards: data and disasters in northern Australia. Nat Hazards 24:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronenberg T (2009) The impact of demographic change on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Germany. Ecol Econ 68:2637–2645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp JP, Block A, Reusswig F, Zickfeld K, Schellnhuber HJ (2006) Semiquantitative assessment of regional climate vulnerability: the north-rhine westphalia study. Clim Change 76:265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlicke C, Scolobig A, Tapsell S, Steinführer A, De Marchi B (2011) Contextualizing social vulnerability: findings from case studies across Europe. Nat Hazards 58:789–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lass W, Reusswig F, Kühn K-D (1998) Disaster vulnerability and “sustainable development”. Integrating disaster vulnerability in the CSD’s list of Indicators: Measuring Sustainable Development in Germany. Bonn

  • Lüchters G, Menkhoff L (1996) Human development as statistical artifact. World Dev 24:1385–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martine R, Helmut M, Olivier D, Dirk S, Karl G, Jürgen PK, Anette M (2006) Heat and drought 2003 in Europe: a climate synthesis. Ann For Sci 63:569–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meentemeyer V (1989) Geographical perspectives of space, time, and scale. Landscape Ecol 3:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffman A, Giovannini E (2005) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide

  • Nelson KS, Abkowitz MD, Camp JV (2015) A method for creating high resolution maps of social vulnerability in the context of environmental hazards. Appl Geogr 63:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem Norwich: Geo Books

  • Prahl BF, Rybski D, Kropp JP, Burghoff O, Held H (2012) Applying stochastic small-scale damage functions to German winter storms. Geophys Res Lett 39:n/a–n/a

  • Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology Philadelphia: 3rd edn, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

  • Rufat S, Tate E, Burton CG, Maroof AS (2015) Social vulnerability to floods: review of case studies and implications for measurement. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 14(4):470–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saisana M, Tarantola S (2002) State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. Ispra

  • Sinus Sociovision (2007) Informationen zu den Sinus-Milieus®. Sinus Sociovision GmbH, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinführer A, Kuhlicke C (2007) Social vulnerability and the 2002 flood. Country Report Germany (Mulde River) Leipzig

  • Stephan C, Norf C, Fekete A (2017) How “Sustainable” are post-disaster measures? Lessons to Be Learned a Decade After the 2004 Tsunami in the Indian Ocean. Int J Disaster Risk Sci pp 1–13

  • Tapsell S, McCarthy S, Faulkner H, Alexander M (2010) Social vulnerability to natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP4 report

  • Tate E (2012) Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Nat Hazards 63:325–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieken A, Kreibich H, Müller M, Merz B (2007) Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrol Sci J 52:1016–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN/HABITAT (2016) HABITAT III. Draft new urban Agenda. 28 July 2016

  • UNISDR (2005) Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015. Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters

  • United Nations (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Geneva

  • Weichselgartner J, Kelman I (2014) Geographies of resilience: Challenges and opportunities of a descriptive concept. Prog Hum Geogr 39:249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welle T, Birkmann J (2015) The world risk index—an approach to assess risk and vulnerability on a global scale. J Extreme Events 02:1550003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welle T, Depietri Y, Angignard M, Birkmann J, Renaud F, Greiving S (2014) Chapter 5—vulnerability assessment to heat waves, floods, and earthquakes using the MOVE framework: test case cologne, Germany. In: Assessment of vulnerability to natural hazards. Elsevier, pp 91–124

  • Werner E (1997) Vulnerable but invincible: high-risk children from birth to adulthood. Acta Paediatr 86:103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner E, Smith R (2001) Journeys from childhood to midlife. Risk, resilience, and recovery. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte JC, Wagner GG (1995) Declining Fertility in East Germany after unification: a demographic response to socioeconomic change. Popul Dev Rev 21:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zebisch M, Grothmann T, Schröter D, Hasse C, Fritsch U, Cramer W (2005) Climate change in Germany. Vulnerability and adaptation of climate sensitive sectors

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TH Köln University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany

    Alexander Fekete

Authors
  1. Alexander Fekete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Fekete.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Explanation of indication aspects per indicator
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fekete, A. Social vulnerability change assessment: monitoring longitudinal demographic indicators of disaster risk in Germany from 2005 to 2015. Nat Hazards 95, 585–614 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3506-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3506-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation