Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of rainfall kinetic energy–intensity relationships for Eastern Ghats Highland region of India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kinetic energy and intensity of rainfall are commonly used factors to predict soil erosion by water. The difficulty in measuring these parameters triggers the scientific community to use the kinetic energy–intensity relationship to compute soil erosion. Six kinetic energy–intensity relationships (three exponential, one linear, one logarithmic and one power law) were used to compute and compare rainfall erosivity of Eastern Ghats Highland region of India. The result showed that when the rainfall intensity was < 6 mm h−1, there was a significant difference among the kinetic energy values computed using Brown and Foster, McGregor and Hudson relationships; however, no significant difference was observed for the values computed with van Dijk and Wischmeier and Smith. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in kinetic energy values computed with the different equations for rainfall intensity greater than 30 mm h−1. Highest and lowest rainfall erosivity was computed for Meshesha (6633.0 MJ ha−1 mm h−1 y−1) and Hudson (5503.2 MJ ha−1 mm h−1 y−1) equations, respectively. On an average, annual rainfall erosivity value was observed to be 23.4% lower when computed using I60 than that of I30. Therefore, use of I60 in place of I30 for the study area cannot be suggested. Instead of that, proper calculation of I30 is more important than choosing right kinetic energy–intensity relationship equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikary PP, Madhu M, Dash ChJ, Sahoo DC, Jakhar P, Naik BS, Hombegowda HC, Naik GB, Dash B (2015) Prioritization of traditional tribal field crops based on RWUE in Koraput district of Odisha. Indian J Tradit Knowl 14(1):88–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Adhikary PP, Hombegowda HC, Barman D, Jakhar P, Madhu M (2017) Soil erosion control and carbon sequestration in shifting cultivated degraded highlands of eastern India: performance of two contour hedgerow systems. Agrofor Syst 91:757–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown LC, Foster GR (1987) Storm erosivity using idealized intensity distributions. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 30:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catari G, Latron J, Gallart F (2011) Assessing the sources of uncertainty associated with the calculation of rainfall kinetic energy and erosivity-application to the Upper Llobregat Basin, NE Spain. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:679–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutinho MA, Tomás PP (1995) Characterization of raindrop size distributions at the Vale Formoso Experimental Erosion Center. CATENA 25:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwell H (1978) Modelling soil losses in Southern Africa. J Agric Eng Res 23:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornis RL, Vermeulen HR, Nieuwenhuis JD (2005) Kinetic energy-rainfall intensity relationship for Central Cebu, Philippines for soil erosion studies. J Hydrol 300:20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR, Yoder DC, Weesies GA, McCool DK, McGregor KC, Bingner R (2008) Draft user’s guide, Revised 15 Universal Soil Loss Equation Version 2 (RUSLE-2), Washington, DC

  • Fox NI (2004) Technical note: the representation of rainfall drop-size distribution and kinetic energy. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:1001–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govers G (1991) Spatial and temporal variations in splash detachment: a field study. CATENA 20:15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson NW (1961) An introduction to the mechanics of soil erosion under conditions of sub-tropical rainfall. Rhod Sci Assoc Proc 49:14–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena AW, Rezaur RB (2000) Measuring drop size distribution and kinetic energy of rainfall using a force transducer. Hydrol Sci 14:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnell PIA (1973) The problem of assessing the erosive power of rainfall from meteorological observations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 37:617–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnell P (1981) Rainfall intensity–kinetic energy relationships for soil loss prediction. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 45:153–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1998) Drop size distribution and energy load of rainstorms at Ibadan Western Nigeria. Soil Tillage Res 48:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws JO, Parsons DA (1943) The relation of raindrop size to intensity. Trans Am Geophys Union 24:452–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenka NK, Dass A, Sudhishri S, Patnaik US (2012) Soil carbon sequestration and erosion control potential of hedgerows and grass filter strips in sloping agricultural lands of eastern India. Agric Ecosyst Environ 158:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo GP, Bonilla CA (2015) Sensitivity analysis of kinetic energy-intensity relationships and maximum rainfall intensities on rainfall erosivity using a long-term precipitation data set. J Hydrol 527:788–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JS, Palmer WM (1948) The distribution of raindrops with size. J Meteorol 5:165–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor KC, Bingner RL, Bowie AJ, Foster GR (1995) Erosivity index values for northern Mississippi. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 38(4):1039–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meshesha DT, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, Haregeweyn N, Adgo E (2014) Drop size distribution and kinetic energy load of rainfall events in the highlands of the central Rift Valley Ethiopia. Hydrol Sci J 59(12):2203–2215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meshesha DT, Tsunekawa A, Tsubo M, Haregeweyn N, Tegegne F (2016) Evaluation of kinetic energy and erosivity potential of simulated rainfall using Laser Precipitation Monitor. Catena 137:237–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyssen J, Vandenreykena H, Poesena J (2005) Rainfall erosivity and variability in the Northern Ethiopian Highlands. J Hydrol 311:172–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SD, Lee KS, Shin S, Lee JS (2008) Development of a Korea-type soil erosion model. In: International conference on firefighting and disaster prevention, Samcheok, Korea, pp 1–6

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 703, Washington, DC

  • Rosewell CJ (1986) Rainfall kinetic energy in eastern Australia. J Clim Appl Meteorol 25:1695–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salles C, Poesen J (2000) Rain properties controlling soil splash detachment. Hydrol Process 14:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Moreno JF, Mannaerts CM, Jetten V, Löffler-Mang M (2012) Rainfall kinetic energy–intensity and rainfall momentum–intensity relationships for Cape Verde. J Hydrol 454–455:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamshad A, Azhari MN, Isa MH, Hussin WMM, Parida BP (2008) Development of an appropriate procedure for estimation of RUSLE EI30 index and preparation of erosivity maps for Pulau Penang in Peninsular Malaysia. Catena 72:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifah Mastura SA, Al-Toum S, Jaafar O (2006) Rain splash erosion: a case study in Tekala River catchment, East Selangor, Malaysia. Geografia 4:44–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinzot A, Bollinne A, Laurant A, Erpicum M, Pissart A (1989) A contribution to the development of an erosivity index adapted to the prediction of erosion in Belgium. Earth Surf Process Landf 14:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudhishri S, Patnaik US (2004) Erosion index analysis for Eastern Ghat High Zone of Orissa. Indian J Dryland Agric Res Dev 19:42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Torri D, Sfalanga M, Del Sette M (1987) Splash detachment: runoff depth and soil cohesion. Catena 14:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usón A, Ramos MC (2001) An improved rainfall erosivity index obtained from experimental inter rill soil losses in soils with a Mediterranean climate. Catena 43:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk AIJM, Bruijnzeel LA, Rosewell CJ (2002) Rainfall intensity–kinetic energy relationships: a critical literature appraisal. J Hydrol 261:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1958) Rainfall energy and its relation to soil loss. Trans Am Geophys Union 39:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 537. Washington, DC

  • Yin S, Xie Y, Nearing MA, Wang C (2007) Estimation of rainfall erosivity using 5- to 60-min fixed-interval rainfall data from China. Catena 70(3):306–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanchi C, Torri D (1980) Evaluation of rainfall energy in Central Italy. In: De Boodt M, Gabriels D (eds) Assessment of erosion. Wiley, London, pp 133–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng M, Chen X (2015) Statistical determination of rainfall-runoff erosivity indices for single storms in the Chinese Loess Plateau. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0117989. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117989

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Partha Pratim Adhikary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dash, C.J., Adhikary, P.P., Das, N.K. et al. Comparison of rainfall kinetic energy–intensity relationships for Eastern Ghats Highland region of India. Nat Hazards 93, 547–558 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3314-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3314-z

Keywords

Navigation