Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 93, Issue 1, pp 315–337 | Cite as

Assessment of the impact of interdependencies on the resilience of networked critical infrastructure systems

  • Quan Mao
  • Nan Li
Original Paper

Abstract

Critical infrastructure systems (CISs) have a fundamental role in delivering commodities that are essential to various functions in urban systems. The resilience of CISs concerns the robustness of system performance against extreme events, the ineffectiveness of disturbance propagation, and the efficiency of post-disaster system performance restoration. The resilience of CISs is significantly impacted by the interconnectivity among CISs and the interactions among different systems. Although this impact has been recognized by numerous studies, it has rarely been comparatively assessed using different metrics that reflect the different perspectives of various stakeholders. Moreover, the existing literature on the impact of interdependencies in the context of CIS disaster risk reduction has primarily focused on the resistance stage rather than the entire life cycle of disaster events. To address these gaps, this study assesses this impact at different stages of the life cycle of disturbance events, analyzes the effect of interdependencies on determining the total resilience of CISs, and discusses the implications of the results in the context of resilience enhancement of CISs in practice. To achieve this objective, this study models interconnected CISs using four different network-based approaches, simulates the disturbance propagation process and system restoration process of CISs in three different scenarios, and measures the resilience of disturbed CISs with three different resilience metrics. A case study of three CISs in a middle-sized city in Eastern China was conducted. The CISs included an electric power system, a telecommunication system, and a water supply system. The results revealed that the vulnerability of CISs to extreme events would be significantly underestimated if interdependencies of the CISs were not considered, which would cause a misleading estimation of the total resilience of the CISs. The findings also suggested the importance of considering the interdependencies of CISs in the sequencing of restoration tasks to optimize the efficiency of post-disaster restoration tasks.

Keywords

Critical infrastructure system Resilience Interdependency Modeling Metric Disturbance propagation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is based on work supported by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant No. 2017YFC0803308, National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. U1709212, 71741023 and 71741025, and Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program under Grant Nos. 2014z21050 and 2015THZ0. The authors are grateful for the support of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, NSFC and Tsinghua University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.

References

  1. Abramson DM, Redlener I (2012) Hurricane sandy: lessons learned, again. Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness 6(4):328–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adjetey-Bahun K, Birregah B, Chtelet E, Planchet J (2016) A model to quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 153:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arboleda CA, Abraham DM, Richard JP, Lubitz R (2006) Impact of interdependencies between infrastructure systems in the operation of health care facilities during disaster events. In: Proceedings of the joint international conference on computing and decision making in civil and building engineering, pp 14–16Google Scholar
  4. Ash J, Newth D (2007) Optimizing complex networks for resilience against cascading failure. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 380:673–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aven T (2013) On how to deal with deep uncertainties in a risk assessment and management context. Risk Anal 33(12):2082–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruneau M, Reinhorn A (2007) Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities. Earthq Spectra 23(1):41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruneau M, Chang S, Eguchi R, Lee G, O’Rourke T, Reinhorn A, Shinozuka M, Tierney K, Wallace W, von Winterfeldt D (2003) A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq Spectra 19(4):733–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cartalis C (2014) Toward resilient cities: a review of definitions, challenges and prospects. Adv Build Energy Res 8(2):259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casalicchio E, Galli E, Tucci S (2010) Macro and micro agent-based modeling and simulation of critical infrastructures. In Complexity in engineering, COMPENG 2010, February 22, 2010–February 24. IEEE Computer Society, Rome, Italy, pp 79–81Google Scholar
  10. Cavdaroglu B, Hammel E, Mitchell JE, Sharkey TC, Wallace WA (2013) Integrating restoration and scheduling decisions for disrupted interdependent infrastructure systems. Ann Oper Res 203(1):279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang S, Shinozuka M (2004) Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities. Earthq Spectra 20(3):739–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi J, Deshmukh A, Naderpajouh N, Hastak M (2017) Dynamic relationship between functional stress and strain capacity of post-disaster infrastructure. Nat Hazards 87(2):817–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chopra SS, Khanna V (2015) Interconnectedness and interdependencies of critical infrastructures in the US economy: implications for resilience. Physica A 436:865–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chou C, Tseng S (2010) Collection and analysis of critical infrastructure interdependency relationships. J Comput Civ Eng 24(6):539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christodoulou SE, Fragiadakis M, Agathokleous A, Xanthos S (2018) Urban water distribution networks: assessing systems vulnerabilities, failures, and risks. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  16. Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010a) Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Eng Struct 32(11):3639–3649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010b) Seismic resilience of a hospital system. Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(1–2):127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cimellaro GP, Solari D, Bruneau M (2014a) Physical infrastructure interdependency and regional resilience index after the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake in Japan. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(12):1763–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cimellaro GP, Solari D, Bruneau M (2014b) Physical infrastructure interdependency and regional resilience index after the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake in Japan. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(12):1763–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Colten CE, Kates RW, Laska SB (2008) Three years after Katrina: lessons for community resilience. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 55(5):36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diao K, Sweetapple C, Farmani R, Fu G, Ward S, Butler D (2016) Global resilience analysis of water distribution systems. Water Res 106:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dudenhoeffer DD, Permann MR, Manic M (2006) CIMS: a framework for infrastructure interdependency modeling and analysis. In: 2006 winter simulation conference, WSC, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc, Monterey, CA, United states, pp 478–485Google Scholar
  23. Duenas-Osorio L, Rojo J (2011) Reliability assessment of lifeline systems with radial topology. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 26(2):111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duenas-Osorio L, Vemuru SM (2009) Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems. Struct Saf 31(2):157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duenas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ (2007a) Seismic response of critical interdependent networks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(2):285–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duenas-Osorio L, Craig JI, Goodno BJ, Bostrom A (2007b) Interdependent response of networked systems. J Infrastruct Syst 13(3):185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleming CH, Spencer M, Thomas J, Leveson N, Wilkinson C (2013) Safety assurance in NextGen and complex transportation systems. Saf Sci 55:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guha S, Moss A, Naor J, Schieber B (1999) Efficient recovery from power outage. In: Conference proceedings of the annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, pp 574–582Google Scholar
  29. Haimes Y, Jiang P (2001) Leonief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures. J Infrastruct Syst 7(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haimes YY, Horowitz BM, Lambert JH, Santos JR, Lian C, Crowther KG (2005) Inoperability input–output model for interdependent infrastructure sectors. I: theory and methodology. J Infrastruct Syst 11(2):67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henry D, Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez J (2012) Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hernandez-Fajardo I, Duenas-Osorio L (2013) Probabilistic study of cascading failures in complex interdependent lifeline systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holden R, Val DV, Burkhard R, Nodwell S (2013) A network flow model for interdependent infrastructures at the local scale. Saf Sci 53:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ip WH, Wang D (2011) Resilience and friability of transportation networks: evaluation, analysis and optimization. IEEE Syst J 5(2):189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jabareen Y (2013) Planning the resilient city: concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities 31:220–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ji C, Wei Y, Poor HV (2017) Resilience of energy infrastructure and services: modeling, data analytics, and metrics. Proc IEEE 105(7, SI):1354–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johansson J, Hassel H (2010) An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95(12):1335–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kafali C, Grigoriu M (2005) Rehabilitation decision analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on structural safety and reliabilityGoogle Scholar
  39. Kasai S, Li N, Fang D (2015) A system-of-systems approach to understanding urbanization—state of the art and prospect. Smart Sustain Built Environ 4(2, SI):154–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kwasinski A, Weaver WW, Chapman PL, Krein PT (2009) Telecommunications power plant damage assessment for hurricane katrina-site survey and follow-up results. IEEE Syst J 3(3):277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Laprie J, Kanoun K, Kaaniche M (2007) Modelling interdependencies between the electricity and information infrastructures. In: Computer safety, reliability, and security, proceedings, p 54Google Scholar
  42. Lee EE II, Mitchell JE, Wallace WA (2007) Restoration of services in interdependent infrastructure systems: a network flows approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 37(6):1303–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lu Q, Peng Z, Zhang J (2015) Identification and prioritization of critical transportation infrastructure: case study of coastal flooding. J Transp Eng 141(3):04014082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luiijf E, Nieuwenhuijs A, Klaver M, van Eeten M, Cruz E (2009) Empirical findings on critical infrastructure dependencies in Europe. In: Critical information infrastructures security, pp 302–310Google Scholar
  45. Martinez-Mares A, Fuerte-Esquivel CR (2013) A robust optimization approach for the interdependency analysis of integrated energy systems considering wind power uncertainty. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(4):3964–3976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matisziw TC, Murray AT, Grubesic TH (2010) Strategic network restoration. Netw Spat Econ 10(3):345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McDaniels T, Chang S, Peterson K, Mikawoz J, Reed D (2007) Empirical framework for characterizing infrastructure failure interdependencies. J Infrastruct Syst 13(3):175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McDaniels T, Chang S, Cole D, Mikawoz J, Longstaff H (2008) Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation. Glob Environ Change Hum Policy Dimens 18(2):310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGee S, Frittman J, Ahn SJ, Murray S (2016) Implications of cascading effects for the hyogo framework. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ 7(2, SI):144–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mendonca D, Wallace WA (2006) Impacts of the 2001 world trade center attack on New York City critical infrastructures. J Infrastruct Syst 12(4):260–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morcous G, Lounis Z (2005) Maintenance optimization of infrastructure networks using genetic algorithms. Autom Constr 14(1):129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nan C, Eusgeld I, Kroeger W (2013) Analyzing vulnerabilities between SCADA system and SUC due to interdependencies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 113:76–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nurre SG, Cavdaroglu B, Mitchell JE, Sharkey TC, Wallace WA (2012) Restoring infrastructure systems: an integrated network design and scheduling (INDS) problem. Eur J Oper Res 223(3):794–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oh EH, Deshmukh A, Hastak M (2013) Criticality assessment of lifeline infrastructure for enhancing disaster response. Nat Hazards Rev 14(2):98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olshansky RB, Johnson LA, Horne J, Nee B (2008) Longer view: planning for the rebuilding of New Orleans. J Am Plan As 74(3):273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Omer M, Nilchiani R, Mostashari A (2009) Measuring the resilience of the trans-oceanic telecommunication cable system. IEEE Syst J 3(3):295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ouyang M (2014) Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ouyang M (2017) A mathematical framework to optimize resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks. Eur J Oper Res 262(3):1072–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ouyang M, Duenas-Osorio L (2011a) Efficient approach to compute generalized interdependent effects between infrastructure systems. J Comput Civ Eng 25(5):394–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ouyang M, Duenas-Osorio L (2011b) An approach to design interface topologies across interdependent urban infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(11):1462–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ouyang M, Duenas-Osorio L (2012) Time-dependent resilience assessment and improvement of urban infrastructure systems. Chaos 22(3):033122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ouyang M, Duenas-Osorio L (2014) Multi-dimensional hurricane resilience assessment of electric power systems. Struct Saf 48:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ouyang M, Hong L, Mao Z, Yu M, Qi F (2009) A methodological approach to analyze vulnerability of interdependent infrastructures. Simul Model Pract Theory 17(5):817–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ouyang M, Duenas-Osorio L, Min X (2012) A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems. Struct Saf 36–37:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Panteli M, Mancarella P, Trakas DN, Kyriakides E, Hatziargyriou ND (2017) Metrics and quantification of operational and infrastructure resilience in power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(6):4732–4742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Papathoma-Koehle M, Keiler M, Totschnig R, Glade T (2012) Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol. Nat Hazards 64(3):2083–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pistrika AK, Jonkman SN (2010) Damage to residential buildings due to flooding of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Nat Hazards 54(2):413–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Poljanek K, Bono F, Gutierrez E (2012) Seismic risk assessment of interdependent critical infrastructure systems: the case of European gas and electricity networks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(1):61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Portante EC, Kavicky JA, Craig BA, Talaber LE, Folga SM (2017) Modeling electric power and natural gas system interdependencies. J Infrastruct Syst 23(4):04017035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pregnolato M, Ford A, Robson C, Glenis V, Barr S, Dawson R (2016) Assessing urban strategies for reducing the impacts of extreme weather on infrastructure networks. R Soc Open Sci 3(5):160023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. President′s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP) (1997) Critical foundations: protecting America′s infrastructures: the report of the President′s commission on critical infrastructure protection. Rep. No. 040-000-00699-1, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  72. Reed DA, Kapur KC, Christie RD (2009) Methodology for assessing the resilience of networked infrastructure. IEEE Syst J 3(2):174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rehak D, Markuci J, Hromada M, Barcova K (2016) Quantitative evaluation of the synergistic effects of failures in a critical infrastructure system. Int J Crit Infrastruct Prot 14:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK (2001) Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Syst Mag 21(6):11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Santella N, Steinberg LJ, Parks K (2009) Decision making for extreme events: modeling critical infrastructure interdependencies to aid mitigation and response planning. Rev Policy Res 26(4, SI):409–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Satumtira G, Dueñas-Osorio L (2010) Synthesis of modeling and simulation methods on critical infrastructure interdependencies research. In: Gopalakrishnan K, Peeta S (eds) Sustainable infrastructure systems: simulation, imaging, and intelligent engineering. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Sharkey TC, Nurre SG, Nguyen H, Chow JH, Mitchell JE, Wallace WA (2016) Identification and classification of restoration interdependencies in the wake of hurricane sandy. J Infrastruct Syst 22(1):04015007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shoji G, Toyota A (2009) Modeling of restoration process associated with critical infrastructure and its interdependency due to a seismic disaster. In: 2009 ASCE technical council on lifeline earthquake engineering conference, TCLEE 2009: lifeline earthquake engineering in a multihazard environment, June 28, 2009–July 1, American Society of Civil Engineers, Oakland, CA, United states, p 62Google Scholar
  79. Suppasri A, Mas E, Charvet I, Gunasekera R, Imai K, Fukutani Y, Abe Y, Imamura F (2013) Building damage characteristics based on surveyed data and fragility curves of the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami. Nat Hazards 66(2):319–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Svendsen NK, Wolthusen SD (2007a) Analysis and statistical properties of critical infrastructure interdependency multiflow models. In: 2007 IEEE workshop on information assurance, IAW’07, June 20, 2007–June 22, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society, West Point, NY, United states, pp 247–254Google Scholar
  81. Svendsen NK, Wolthusen SD (2007b) Connectivity models of interdependency in mixed-type critical infrastructure networks. Inf Secur Tech Rep 12(1):44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Trucco P, Cagno E, De Ambroggi M (2012) Dynamic functional modelling of vulnerability and interoperability of critical infrastructures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 105:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Uday P, Marais K (2015) Designing resilient systems-of-systems: a survey of metrics, methods, and challenges. Syst Eng 18(5):491–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. UNISDR (2015) Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2015. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2015/en/gar-pdf/GAR2015_EN.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2017
  85. United Nations (2015) Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030Google Scholar
  86. Vickery PJ, Lin J, Skerlj PF, Twisdale LA Jr, Huang K (2006a) HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. I: hurricane hazard, terrain, and wind load modeling. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vickery PJ, Skerlj PF, Lin J, Twisdale LA, Young MA, Lavelle FM (2006b) HAZUS-MH hurricane model methodology. II: damage and loss estimation. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wang Z, Wang Q, Zukerman M, Guo J, Wang Y, Wang G, Yang J, Moran B (2017) Multiobjective path optimization for critical infrastructure links with consideration to seismic resilience. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 32(10):836–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Winkler J, Duenas-Osorio L, Stein R, Subramanian D (2011) Interface network models for complex urban infrastructure systems. J Infrastruct Syst 17(4):138–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Xu N, Guikema SD, Davidson RA, Nozick LK, Cagnan Z, Vaziri K (2007) Optimizing scheduling of post-earthquake electric power restoration tasks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36(2):265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Yaukey PH (2012) Population changes of urban land birds in the three years following the hurricane Katrina flood. Nat Hazards 61(3):1203–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zhang P, Peeta S (2011) A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems. Transp Res Part B Methodol 45(3):553–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zhang J, Hu F, Wang S, Dai Y, Wang Y (2016) Structural vulnerability and intervention of high speed railway networks. Physica A 462:743–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zio E, Golea LR (2010) Identification of betweenness-central groups of components in a complex network infrastructure by genetic algorithms. In: Reliability, risk and safety: theory and applications, vol 1–3, VSB, Tech Univ Ostrava; RWE Transgas Net, pp 1573–1578Google Scholar
  95. Zobel CW (2011) Representing perceived tradeoffs in defining disaster resilience. Decis Support Syst 50(2):394–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Construction ManagementTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations