Dynamic process simulation of rainfall-induced Sanxicun landslide based on a thermo-poro-elastic approach
- 135 Downloads
The Sanxicun landslide occurred on July 10, 2013, in Sanxicun Village, which is located in Dujiangyan City, Sichuan Province, China. It travelled up to 1200 m, destroyed 11 houses, and killed 166 people in the village. To explain how this landslide could travel such a large distance and cause such serious damage, this study used a thermo-poro-elastic approach coupled with the Savage–Hutter model to simulate the dynamic process of the Sanxicun landslide. The simulated results were compared with the actual results, as well as those of other researchers. It showed that the simulated results for the landslide profile and mass accumulation scope were basically consistent with the actual results. The simulated landslide runout was 1242 m, which was quite close to the actual value. The simulated maximum mass accumulation thickness was 16.4 m. The maximum velocity was 32.6 m/s, which was between those calculated by Yin et al. (J Eng Geol 22(2):309–318, 2014), Yin et al. (Landslide 13:9–23, 2016), and the various trends were found to be consistent. The temperature change and the pore water pressure evolution in the shear zone during sliding are also obtained by simulation. This study had recreated the Sanxicun landslide motion process from the view of thermo-poro-elastic coupling within the shear zone.
KeywordsLandslide Dynamic process Simulation Thermo-poro-elastic Savage–Hutter model
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41401004, 41472293), NSFC-ICIMOD (Grant No. 41661144041), Science and Technology Plan Project of Sichuan Province (2016SZ0067), and Key Research and Development Projects of Sichuan Province (2017SZ0041), CAS “Light of West China” program.
- Anderson DL (1980) An earthquake induced heat mechanism to explain the loss of strength of large rock and earth slides. In: International conference on engineering for protection from natural disasters, BangkokGoogle Scholar
- Gaziev E (1984) Study of the Usoy landslide in Pamir. In: IV International symposium on landslides torontoGoogle Scholar
- Heim A (1932) Landslides and human lives. In: Skermer N (ed) Bi-Tech Publishers, VancouverGoogle Scholar
- Hsu KJ (1975) Catastrophic debris streams (sturzsrtoms) generated by rockfalls. Geol Soc Am Bull 86(1):129Google Scholar
- Hungr O (2002) Analytical models for slides and flows. Int Symp Landslide Risk Mitig Prot Cult Nat Herit. Kyoto, Japan, pp 559–586Google Scholar
- Vandre B (1985) Delineation of landslide, flash flood and debris flow hazards in Utah. In: Proceedings of a specialty conference: Utah Water Research Laboratory. Gen SerRep UWRL/G–85/03 In: Bowles DS (ed) Rudd Creek Debris Flow, pp 117–131Google Scholar
- Xing A, Hu H, Yao L (2001) Pore liquid pressure of large high-speed rockslide in initial stage. Bull Soil Water Conserv 21(3):17–19Google Scholar
- Yin ZQ, Xu YQ, Zhao WJ (2014) Sanxi village landslide in Dujiangyan, Sichuan province on July 10, 2013. J Eng Geol 22(2):309–318Google Scholar
- Zhang M, Yin Y, Wu S, Zhang Y (2010) Development status and prospects of studies on kinematics of long runout rock avalanches. J Eng Geol 18(6):805–817Google Scholar