Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 735–758 | Cite as

Different types of flooding lead to different human and material damages: the case of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area

Original Paper
  • 209 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, both human and material damages caused by different types of flooding in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (LMA) were determined for the first time. Human damages (fatalities, evacuated and displaced people) were obtained from the DISASTER database (1865–2010 period). Material damages’ estimation was obtained from the Portuguese Association of Insurers database for the period 2000–2010. A classification of types of flooding based on the hydrological/physical features of the territory separating fluvial floods (slow and flash floods) from urban flooding (related and unrelated to the ancient natural drainage network—FREN and FUNN) was used. Topographic maps from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (1:10,000 and 1:25,000 scales), information from newspapers and daily rainfall data were used to define this classification and to validate the flooding occurrences. It was concluded that: (1) during 146 years, 131 flooding events with human damages occurred in the LMA; (2) 120 flooding events with material damages were registered in 1781 places for 11 years; (3) the spatial distribution of human and material damages was very different; (4) each type of flooding caused distinct human and material damages; (5) the importance of each type of flooding varied over time due to human interventions in the territory; (6) there is a clear decrease in the mortality associated with flooding even during the extreme flooding events. This study contributes for spatial planning and insurance companies, allowing to define the temporal evolution and spatial patterns of the types of flooding, as well as to understand their future damages.

Keywords

Types of flooding Human damages Material damages DISASTER database Insurance database Lisbon Metropolitan Area 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Portuguese Association of Insurers (APS) and the CIRAC project (Floods and Risk in Climate Change Scenarios) for their support and for providing the insurance data used in this research. Miguel Leal was funded by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) through the grant SFRH/BD/96632/2013. Susana Pereira was financed by national funds through FCT, under the framework of the project FORLAND—Hydro-geomorphologic risk in Portugal: driving forces and application for land use planning (PTDC/ATPGEO/1660/2014).

References

  1. Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW (2011) Climate change impacts on pricing long-term flood insurance: a comprehensive study for the Netherlands. Glob Environ Chang 21:1045–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. André C, Monfort D, Bouzit M, Vinchon C (2013) Contribution of insurance data to cost assessment of coastal flood damage to residential buildings: insights gained from Johanna (2008) and Xynthia (2010) storm events. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:2003–2012.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2003-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archetti R, Bolognesi A, Casadio A, Maglionico M (2011) Development of flood probability charts for urban drainage network in coastal areas through a simplified joint assessment approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:3115–3122.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3115-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronica GT, Lanza LG (2005) Drainage efficiency in urban areas: a case study. Hydrol Process 19:1105–1119.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevêdo TM, Nunes E, Ramos C (2004) Some morphological aspects and hydrological characterization of the Tagus floods in the Santarém Region, Portugal. Nat Hazards 31:587–601.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000024892.61336.ec CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnolas M, Llasat MC (2007) A flood geodatabase and its climatological applications: the case of Catalonia for the last century. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7:271–281.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-7-271-2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrera A, Llasat MC, Barriendos M (2006) Estimation of extreme flash flood evolution in Barcelona County from 1351 to 2005. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:505–518.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-505-2006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barriendos M, Rodrigo FS (2006) Study of historical flood events on Spanish rivers using documentary data. Hydrol Sci J 51:765–783.  https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.5.765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barriendos M, Coeur D, Lang M et al (2003) Stationarity analysis of historical flood series in France and Spain (14th–20th centuries). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:583–592.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-3-583-2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker JS, Taylor HL, Doody BJ et al (2015) A review of people’s behavior in and around floodwater. Weather Clim Soc 7:321–332.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00030.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benito G, Díez-Herrero A, Fernández De Villalta M (2003) Magnitude and frequency of flooding in the Tagus basin (Central Spain) over the last millennium. Clim Chang 58:171–192.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023417102053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brázdil R, Kundzewicz ZW, Benito G (2006) Historical hydrology for studying flood risk in Europe. Hydrol Sci J 51:739–764.  https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.5.739 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler D, Davies JW (2004) Urban drainage, 2nd edn. Spon Press, London. ISBN 0-203-34190-2Google Scholar
  14. Camarasa-Belmonte AM, Soriano-García J (2012) Flood risk assessment and mapping in peri-urban Mediterranean environments using hydrogeomorphology. Application to ephemeral streams in the Valencia region (eastern Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 104:189–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang TJ, Wang CH, Chen AS (2015) A novel approach to model dynamic flow interactions between storm sewer system and overland surface for different land covers in urban areas. J Hydrol 524:662–679.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen WB, Liu WC (2014) Modeling flood inundation induced by river flow and storm surges over a river basin. Water 6:3182–3199.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w6103182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CNT (2014) The prevalence and cost of urban flooding: a case study of cook county. Chicago, Center for Neighborhood TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  18. Crompton RP, McAneney KJ (2008) Normalised Australian insured losses from meteorological hazards: 1967–2006. Environ Sci Policy 11:371–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Moel H, Aerts JCJH (2011) Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Nat Hazards 58:407–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9675-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diakakis M, Deligiannakis G, Pallikarakis A, Skordoulis M (2016) Factors controlling the spatial distribution of flash flooding in the complex environment of a metropolitan urban area. The case of Athens 2013 flash flood event. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 18:171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falconer RH, Cobby D, Smyth P et al (2009) Pluvial flooding: new approaches in flood warning, mapping and risk management. J Flood Risk Manag 2:198–208.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01034.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fragoso M (2004) O contexto atmosférico dos episódios de precipitações intensas no Sul de Portugal. Relatório 39, Área de Investigação de Geografia Física e Ambiente, Centro de Estudos Geográficos, Lisbon. ISBN: 972-636-148-6Google Scholar
  23. Fragoso M, Trigo RM, Zêzere JL, Valente MA (2010) The exceptional rainfall event in Lisbon on 18 February 2008. Weather 65:31–35.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fragoso M, Ramos C, Lopes A, Alcoforado MJ, Silva S, Palma A, Boavida-Portugal I (2011) Assessment of frequency-magnitude of extreme rainfall events and flooding—Portugal. In: N1.2 Report WP1. Secoa—Solutions for Environmental contrasts in Coastal Areas, Project n_: 244251 FP7-ENV.2009.2.1.5, p 29Google Scholar
  25. Hammond MJ, Chen AS, Djordjević S et al (2015) Urban flood impact assessment: a state-of-the-art review. Urban Water J 12:14–29.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoeppe P (2016) Trends in weather related disasters—consequences for insurers and society. Weather Clim Extrem 11:70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huong HTL, Pathirana A (2013) Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flooding in Can Tho city, Vietnam. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:379–394.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-379-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hurford AP, Priest SJ, Parker DJ, Lumbroso DM (2012) The effectiveness of extreme rainfall alerts in predicting surface water flooding in England and Wales. Int J Climatol 32:1768–1774.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J (2012) Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century. World Bank. ISBN 978-0-8213-8866-2Google Scholar
  30. Jongman B, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Feyen L et al (2014) Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods. Nat Clim Chang 4:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2124 Google Scholar
  31. Leal M, Ramos C (2013) Susceptibilidade às cheias na Área Metropolitana de Lisboa Norte. Finisterra 95:17–40.  https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis3129 Google Scholar
  32. Liberato MLR, Ramos AM, Trigo RM (2012) Moisture sources and large-scale dynamics associated with a flash flood event. In: Lin J, Brunner D, Gerbig C et al (eds) Lagrangian modeling of the atmosphere. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 111–126.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gm001244 Google Scholar
  33. Llasat MC, Barriendos M, Barrera A, Rigo T (2005) Floods in Catalonia (NE Spain) since the 14th century. Climatological and meteorological aspects from historical documentary sources and old instrumental records. J Hydrol 313:32–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Llasat MC, López L, Barnolas M, Llasat-Botija M (2008) Flash-floods in Catalonia: the social perception in a context of changing vulnerability. Adv Geosci 17:63–70.  https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-17-63-2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Llasat MC, Llasat-Botija M, Barnolas M et al (2009) An analysis of the evolution of hydrometeorological extremes in newspapers: the case of Catalonia, 1982–2006. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1201–1212.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1201-2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Llasat MC, Llasat-Botija M, Prat MA et al (2010) High-impact floods and flash floods in Mediterranean countries: the FLASH preliminary database. Adv Geosci 23:47–55.  https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-23-47-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Llasat MC, Llasat-Botija M, Petrucci O et al (2013) Towards a database on societal impact of Mediterranean floods within the framework of the HYMEX project. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1337–1350.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1337-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marchi L, Borga M, Preciso E, Gaume E (2010) Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management. J Hydrol 394:118–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merz B, Kreibich H, Thieken A, Schmidtke R (2004) Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:153–163.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mills E (2005) Insurance in a climate of change. Science 309:1040–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oliveira PE, Ramos C (2002) Inundações na cidade de Lisboa durante o século XX e seus factores agravantes. Finisterra 74:33–54.  https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis1589 Google Scholar
  42. Patton P (1988) Drainage basin morphometry and floods. In: Baker V, Kochel R, Patton P (eds) Flood geomorphology. Wiley, New York, pp 51–65. ISBN 978-0471625582Google Scholar
  43. Paudel Y, Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH (2015) Influence of climate change and socio-economic development on catastrophe insurance: a case study of flood risk scenarios in the Netherlands. Reg Environ Chang 15:1717–1729.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0736-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pereira S, Zêzere JL, Quaresma I et al (2016) Mortality patterns of hydro-geomorphologic disasters. Risk Anal 36:1188–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pereira S, Diakakis M, Deligiannakis G, Zêzere JL (2017) Comparing flood mortality in Portugal and Greece (Western and Eastern Mediterranean). Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 22:147–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Petrucci O (2013) Brief communication the assessment of damage caused by historical landslide events. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:755–761.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-755-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Priest SJ, Parker DJ, Hurford AP et al (2011) Assessing options for the development of surface water flood warning in England and wales. J Environ Manag 92:3038–3048.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramos C, Reis E (2002) Floods in Southern Portugal: their physical and human causes, impacts and human response. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 7:267–284.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024475529524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rashid H (2011) Interpreting flood disasters and flood hazard perceptions from newspaper discourse: tale of two floods in the Red River valley, Manitoba, Canada. Appl Geogr 31:35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rudari R, Gabellani S, Delogu F (2014) A simple model to map areas prone to surface water flooding. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 10:428–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruiz-Bellet JL, Balasch JC, Tuset J et al (2015) Historical, hydraulic, hydrological and meteorological reconstruction of 1874 Santa Tecla flash floods in Catalonia (NE Iberian Peninsula). J Hydrol 524:279–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith K, Ward R (1998) Floods: physical processes and human impacts. Wiley, Chichester. ISBN 978-0-471-95248-0Google Scholar
  53. Spekkers MH, Kok M, Clemens FHLR, Ten Veldhuis JAE (2013) A statistical analysis of insurance damage claims related to rainfall extremes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:913–922.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-913-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spekkers MH, Clemens FHLR, Ten Veldhuis JAE (2015) On the occurrence of rainstorm damage based on home insurance and weather data. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:261–272.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-261-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suriya S, Mudgal BV, Nelliyat P (2012) Flood damage assessment of an urban area in Chennai, India, part I: methodology. Nat Hazards 62:149–167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9985-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thieken AH, Petrow T, Kreibich H, Merz B (2006) Insurability and mitigation of flood losses in private households in Germany. Risk Anal 26:383–395.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00741.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trigo RM, Ramos C, Pereira SS et al (2016) The deadliest storm of the 20th century striking Portugal: flood impacts and atmospheric circulation. J Hydrol 541:597–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yu D, Coulthard TJ (2015) Evaluating the importance of catchment hydrological parameters for urban surface water flood modelling using a simple hydro-inundation model. J Hydrol 524:385–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zêzere JL, Pereira S, Tavares AO et al (2014) DISASTER: a GIS database on hydro-geomorphologic disasters in Portugal. Nat Hazards 72:503–532.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1018-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhou Q, Panduro TE, Thorsen BJ, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K (2013) Verification of flood damage modelling using insurance data. Water Sci Technol 68(2):425–432.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Estudos Geográficos, Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do TerritórioUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Edifício IGOTLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations