Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 659–669 | Cite as

Has foreign direct investment increased air pollution in China? A hierarchical linear model approach

  • Xiang Cao
  • Ping Wang
  • Bangzhu Zhu
Original Paper
  • 267 Downloads

Abstract

Focusing on the mechanism of foreign direct investment on environment, we attempt to build a series of hierarchical linear models to explore the impact of foreign direct investment on China’s sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions by using the panel data of industrial sector in Chinese provinces from 2002 to 2013. The findings show that: Firstly, the industrial SO2 emission shows a slow downward trend. Secondly, 27.96% of the variations of SO2 emission intensity come from the differences between the provinces. Thirdly, foreign direct investment can explain 50.50% of the different changes in provincial SO2 emission intensity due to economic scale effect, structural effect, technological effect, and environmental regulation effect. Among them, the scale effect and technical effect are negatively correlated with SO2 emissions intensity, while structural and environmental regulation effects positively. Moreover, foreign direct investment can significantly inhibit the positive correlation of structural effect and weaken the negative correlation of technology effect on SO2 emission intensity, but do not have a significant impact on SO2 emission intensity by economic scale effect and environmental regulation effect.

Keywords

Foreign direct investment Sulfur dioxide emission Hierarchical linear models 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Our heartfelt thanks should also be given to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71771105, 71473180, 71303174, 91646112, 71303076, and 71673083), National Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of China (15ZDA054, 16ZZD049), Guangdong Young Zhujiang Scholar (Yue Jiaoshi [2016]95), Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents of Guangdong (2014A030306031), Guangdong Key Base of Humanities and Social Science—Enterprise Development Research Institute, Institute of Resource, Environment and Sustainable Development Research, and Guangzhou key Base of Humanities and Social Science—Centre for Low Carbon Economic Research for their funding supports.

References

  1. Atici C (2012) Carbon emissions, trade liberalization, and the Japan–ASEAN interaction: a group-wise examination. J Jpn Int Econ 26(1):167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badri AK (2014) Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Consequences of Economic Growth. International Journal of Modern Management and Foresight 1(1):1–12Google Scholar
  3. Cao X, Yu S (2014) Comparative study on effect of foreign capital and domestic capital on air pollution: an empirical analysis based on industrial sulfur dioxide emissions. J Int Trade 9:67–76 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  4. Chaudhuri S, Mukhopadhyay U (2013) Foreign direct investment, environmentally sound technology and informal sector. Econ Model 31:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Q, Maung M, Shi Y et al (2014) Foreign direct investment concessions and environmental levies in China. Int Rev Financ Anal 36:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung S (2014) Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: evidence from South Korea. J Dev Econ 108:222–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole MA, Elliott RJR (2005) FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzles. Rev Dev Econ 9(4):530–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Zhang J (2011) Growth, foreign direct investment, and the environment: evidence from Chinese cities. J Reg Sci 51(1):121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  10. Hassaballa H (2013) Environment and foreign direct investment: policy implications for developing countries. J Emerg Issues Econ Finance Bank (JEIEFB) 1:75–106Google Scholar
  11. Kim MH, Adilov N (2012) The lesser of two evils: an empirical investigation of foreign direct investment-pollution tradeoff. Appl Econ 44(20):2597–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirkulak B, Qiu B, Yin W (2011) The impact of FDI on air quality: evidence from China. J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 4(2):81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neelakanta NT, Gundimeda H, Kathuria V (2013) Does environmental quality influence fdi inflows? A panel data analysis for Indian states. Rev Mark Integr 5(3):303–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pazienza P (2015) The environmental impact of the FDI inflow in the transport sector of OECD countries and policy implications. Int Adv Econ Res 21(1):105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yildirim E (2014) Energy use, CO2 emission and foreign direct investment: is there any inconsistence between causal relations? Front Energy 8(3):269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementHainan UniversityHaikouChina
  2. 2.Institute for Resource and Environmental Sustainable DevelopmentJinan UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.School of ManagementJinan UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations