Enhancing the development of sharing economy to mitigate the carbon emission: a case study of online ride-hailing development in China
The rapid development of online ride-hailing sharing economic platform provided an efficient way to mitigate the carbon emission of modern traffic in China. However, its development was blocked by the social management system whose update is relatively slow. How to resolve the conflict between the new economic paradigm development under the technology empowerment and the old public administration system and effectively solve the new economic and social problems it brought by are the major challenges for the healthy and sustainable development of this type of sharing economy. To shed light on the solutions to such conflict, the present paper conducts a case study on China’s largest online ride-hailing platform ‘Didi Chuxing’. The results indicate that the separation of ownership and use rights following the sharing economy brings a new approach to the efficient use of resources. The development of Didi displays a bottom-up policy innovation and institutional change. The path choice of enterprise development will affect its acquisition of legitimacy to a great extent. In this mobile Internet era, the public plays a critical role in shaping the new policy.
KeywordsCarbon emission Sharing economy Online ride-hailing Technology empowerment Public policy
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71271079).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Airbnb (2014) New study reveals a greener way to travel: Airbnb community shows environmental benefits of home sharing. https://www.airbnb.com/press/news/new-study-reveals-a-greener-way-to-travel-airbnb-community-shows-environmental-benefits-of-home-sharing. Accessed on 6 Dec 2016
- Botsman R, Rogers R (2010) What’s mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- BP (2017) The BP statistical review of world energy 2017. BP Google Scholar
- Cao L, Cai YF, Sheng YY et al (2015) Uber: starts an era of “sharing economy”. China Machine Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Cheng W, Liu Q, Zhang XF (2016) Didi: sharing economy changed China. People’s Post & Telecom Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- China National Bureau of Statistics (2015) The statistical yearbook of Chinese cities. Chinese Statistic Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- China National Bureau of Statistics (2016) The statistical yearbook of Chinese cities. Chinese Statistic Press, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt KM (1991) Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Acad Manag Rev 16(3):620–627Google Scholar
- Gansky L (2010) The mesh: why the future of business is sharing. Portfolio of Trade, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Glaser BSA (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Publishing, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Kwee Z, Van Den Bosch FA, Volberda HW (2010) The influence of top management team’s corporate governance orientation on strategic renewal trajectories. ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2010-032-STRGoogle Scholar
- Liu Y, Xia JCH (2016) Sharing economy theory and policy research trends. Econ Perspect 4:16–25 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Ma HT, Zhang XR, Sun Y et al (2016) Sharing economy: new economic plans from the supply side. Citic Publishing Group, Beijing (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- People’s Daily (2016) Chinese private cars exceed 124 million. http://society.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0126/c1008-28083704.html. Accessed on 6th Dec 2016
- Schor JB, Fitzmaurice CJ (2015) Collaborating and connecting: the emergence of the sharing economy. In: Reisch L, Thogersen J (eds) Handbook of research on sustainable consumption. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 410Google Scholar
- Yin RK (2013) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar