Natural Hazards

, Volume 86, Issue 3, pp 1291–1306 | Cite as

Empirical correlation of SPT blow counts versus shear wave velocity for different types of soils in Dholera, Western India

  • Sarda Thokchom
  • B. K. Rastogi
  • N. N. Dogra
  • Vasu Pancholi
  • B. Sairam
  • Falguni Bhattacharya
  • Vandana Patel
Original Paper
  • 264 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, a set of correlation relations between standard penetrations tests (SPT-N values) and shear wave velocity (Vs) for different categories of soils is developed for Dholera region, Gujarat state, Western India. Shear wave velocities were measured using multichannel analysis of surface wave (MASW at 42 sites) and by PS logging (at 16 sites). SPT-N values were taken in total 87 geotechnical boreholes at depth interval of 3 m. Seismic site classification is done as per National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program of the USA. Total 336 pairs of SPT-N values and Vs data at different depths are used to develop the regression correlation between uncorrected SPT-N value and Vs and compared with the results of other workers from India and worldwide for all soils type. It is found that regression correlations developed for clay and all soils are almost similar to each other, for sand, the coefficient value is less and for silt, it is higher. The new regression equation gives good prediction performance. The present correlation can be used for the seismic hazard study for the study area and also for the other areas having similar soil strata using a process of validation.

Keywords

Shear wave velocity Dynamic properties of soil Geophysical testing Standard penetrations tests Multichannel analysis of surface wave Regression correlation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Mr. Fumio Kaneko of Oyo International Corporation for guiding this work and preparing some of the figures. Authors are grateful to Dr. M. Ravi Kumar, Director General, ISR for permission to publish the work and Dr. Sumer Chopra, Director for his support. The study was funded by Gujarat Infrastructure Development Board and GICCL.

References

  1. Akin MK, Kramer SL, Topal T (2011) Empirical correlations of shear wave velocity (Vs) and penetration resistance (SPT-N) for different soils in an earthquake-prone area (Erbaa-Turkey). Eng Geol 119:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allchin B, Goudie AS, Hegde KTM (1978) Prehistory and palaeogeography of the Great Indian Desert. Academic Press, London, p 370Google Scholar
  3. Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2008a) Mapping of average shear wave velocity for Bangalore region: a case study. J Environ EngGeophy 13(2):69–84Google Scholar
  4. Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2008b) Site characterization and site response studies using shear wave velocities. J Seismol Earthq Eng 10(2):53–67Google Scholar
  5. Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG (2010) Relationship between low strain shear modulus and standard penetration test N-values. ASTM Geotech Test J 33(2):150–164Google Scholar
  6. Anbazhagan P, Adithya P, Rashmi HN (2011) Review of the correlations between SPT N and shear modulus: a new correlation application to any region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.01.005 Google Scholar
  7. Anbazhagan P, Kumar Abhishek, Sitharam TG (2012) Seismic site classification and correlation between standard penetration test N value and shear wave velocity for Lucknow City in Indo-Gangetic Basin. Pure appl Geophys 170(2013):299–318. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0525-1 Google Scholar
  8. Athanasopoulos GA (1995) Empirical correlation Vs–N SPT for soils of Greece; a comparative study of reliability study of reliability. In: Proceeding of the 7th international conference on soil dynamics earthquake engineering (Chania, Crete) AS Cakmak (Southampton: Computation Mechanics), pp 19–36Google Scholar
  9. Biswas SK (1982) Rift basins in western margins of India and their hydrocarbon prospects with special reference to Kutch basin. Am As Pet Geol 10:1497–1513Google Scholar
  10. Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthq Spectra 10:617–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandenberg SJ, Ballana N, Shantz T (2010) Shear wave velocity as a statistical function of standard penetration test resistance and vertical effective stress at Caltrans Bridge Sites PEER Report 2010/03Google Scholar
  12. BSSC (2003) NEHRP recommended provision for seismic regulation for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 450), Part 1: Provisions, Building Safety seismic council for the federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Dikmen U (2009) Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. J Geophys Eng 6:61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fabbrocino S, Lanzano G, Forte G, Santucci de Magistris F, Todisco F, Fabbrocino G (2015) SPT blow count vs. shear wave velocity relationship in the structurally complex formations of the Molise Region (Italy). Eng Geol 187:84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fujiwara T (1972) Estimation of ground movements in actual destructive earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 4th European symposium on earthquake engineering, London, pp 125–132Google Scholar
  16. Hansancebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlation between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessment. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanumantharao C, Ramana GV (2008) Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117(S2):719–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IBC (2009) International Building Code, published by International Codes CouncilGoogle Scholar
  19. Imai T (1977) P-and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. In: Proceedings of the IXth international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Japan, vol 2, pp 127–132Google Scholar
  20. Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium of penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 67–72Google Scholar
  21. Imai T, Yoshimura Y (1970) Elastic wave velocity and soil properties in soft soil. Tsuchito-Kiso 18(1):17–22Google Scholar
  22. IS: 2131 (1981) Method for standard penetration test for soils. Bureau of Indian standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. Iyisan R (1996) Correlations between shear wave velocity and in situ penetration test results. Chamber of civil engineers of Turkey. Teknik Dergi 7(2):1187–1199Google Scholar
  24. Jafari MK, Asghari A, Rahmani I (1997) Empirical correlation between shear wave velocity (Vs) and SPT-N value for south Tehran soils. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on civil engineering, Tehran, IranGoogle Scholar
  25. Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Ramzkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of the fine grained soils in South of Tehran. J Seismol Earthq Eng 4(1):25–35Google Scholar
  26. Jinan Z (1987) Correlation between seismic wave velocity and the number of blow of SPT and depth. Selected papers from the Chinese J Geotech Eng ASCE 92–100Google Scholar
  27. JRA (Japan Road Association 1980) Specification for Highway bridges, Part V, Earthquake Resistance DesignGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalteziotis N, Sabatakakis N, Vassiliou I (1992) Evaluation of dynamic characteristics of Greek soil formations. In: Proceedings of the 2nd hellenic conference on geotechnical engineering, Thessaloniki, vol II, pp 239–246 (in Greek)Google Scholar
  29. Kayabali K (1996) Soil liquefaction evaluation using shear wave velocity. Eng Geol 44(1):121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kiku H, Yoshida N, Yasuda S, Irisawa T, Nakazawa H, Shimizu Y, Ansal A, Erkan A (2001) In situ penetration tests and soil profiling in Adapazari, Turkey. In: Proceedings of the ICSMGE/TC4 satellite conference on lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes, pp 259–265Google Scholar
  31. Koçkar MK, Akgün H (2008) Development of a geotechnical and geophysical database for seismic zonation of the Ankara Basin, Turkey. Environ Geol 55:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koçkar MK, Akgun H, Rathje EM (2010) Evaluation of site conditions for Ankara Basin of Turkey based on seismic site characterization of near-surface geologic materials. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(1):8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuo C-H, Wen K-L, Hsieh H-H, Chang T-M, Lin C-M, Chen C-T (2011) Evaluating empirical regression equations for Vs and estimating Vs30 in northeastern Taiwan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(3):431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee SHH (1990) Regression models of shear wave velocities. J Chin Inst Eng 13:519–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee SH-H (1992) Analysis of Multicollinearity of regression equations of shear wave velocities. Soils Found 32(1):205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mark AR, Bray JD, Abrahamson A (2001) An empirical geotechnical seismic site response procedure. Earthq Spectra 17(1):65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayne PW, Rix GJ (1995) Correlations between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance in natural clays. Soils Found 35(2):107–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merh SS, Chamyal LS (1993) The quaternary sediments in Gujarat. Curr Sci 64:823–827Google Scholar
  40. Nigam R, Henriques PJ, Wagh AB (1993) Barnacle fouling on relict foraminiferal specimens from the western continental margin of India. An indicator of paleosea-level. Shelf Res 13:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ohba S, Toriumi I (1970) Dynamic response characteristics of Osaka Plain. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting AIJGoogle Scholar
  42. Ohshaki Y, Iwashaki R (1973) Dynamic shear moduli and Poisson’s ratio of soil deposits. Soils Found 13:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6(2):167–187. doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290060205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Otha T, Hara A, Niwa M, Sakano T (1972) Elastic shear moduli as estimated from N-Value. In: Proceeding 7th annual convention of Japan society of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 265–268Google Scholar
  45. Piratheepan P (2002) Estimating shear-wave velocity from SPT and CPT data. Master of Science Thesis, Clemson UniversityGoogle Scholar
  46. Pitilakis KD, Anastasiadis A, Raptakis D (1992) Field and laboratory determination of dynamic properties of natural soil deposits. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, Rotterdam, pp 1275–1280Google Scholar
  47. Pitilakis K, Raptakis D, Lontzetidis K, Tika-Vassilikou T, Jongmans D (1999) Geotechnical and geophysical description of Euro-Seistests, using field and laboratory tests and moderate strong ground motions. J Earthq Eng 3(3):381–409Google Scholar
  48. Raptakis DG, Anastasiadis SAJ, Pitilakis KD, Lontzetidis KS (1995) Shear wave velocities and damping of Greek natural soils. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on earthquake engendering, Vienna, pp 477–482Google Scholar
  49. Rollins KM, Deihi NB, Weaver TJ (1998) Implications of Vs-BPT (N1)60 correlations for liquefaction assessment in gravels: GSP 75. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 124:506–517Google Scholar
  50. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. Preprint 81–544, in situ testing to evaluate liquefaction susceptibility, ASCE National Convention, Missouri, pp 81–544Google Scholar
  51. Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109:458–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung RM (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations J. Geotech Eng 111(12):1425–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shibata T (1970) Analysis of liquefaction of saturated sand during cyclic loading. Disaster Prev Res Inst Bull 13:563–570Google Scholar
  54. Sisman H (1995) An investigation on relationships between shear wave velocity and SPT and pressuremeter test results. M.Sc. Thesis, Ankara University, Geophysical Engineering Department, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  55. Sykora DW, Stokoe KH II (1983) Correlations of in situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity, soil characteristics and site conditions. Geotechnical engineering report GR83-33. The University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
  56. Tsiambaos G, Sabatakakis N (2011) Empirical estimation of shear wave velocity from in situ tests on soil formations in Greece. Bull Eng Geol Environ 70:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Uma Maheshwari R, Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR (2010) Use of surface waves in statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance of Chennai soils. Geotech GoelEng 28:119–137Google Scholar
  58. Wagle BG, Vora KH, Karisiddalah SM, Veerayya M, Almeida F (1994) Holocene submarine terrace on the western continental shelf of India—implication for sea level changes. Mar Geol 117:207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yoshida Y, Ikemi M, and T Kokusho (1988) Empirical formulas of SPT blow counts for gravelly soils. In: Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on penetration testing, vol 2, Orlando, FL, pp 381–387Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Seismological ResearchGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Applied GeologyKurukshetra UniversityKurukshetraIndia

Personalised recommendations