Natural Hazards

, Volume 86, Issue 2, pp 695–709 | Cite as

Estimation of seismic hazard in Odisha by remote sensing and GIS techniques

Original Paper


This paper determines the risk of earthquake hazard due to amplification of seismic waves in coastal Odisha. Seismic hazards has been estimated by analysis of geomorphological features and thickness of unconsolidated soil cover. Areas with quaternary to recent deposits have great potential to amplify intensity of seismic waves and consequently the ground motion. Morphometric analysis of the DEM data has been conducted to identify areas with high potential of accumulation of unconsolidated sediment, and other parameters that influence deposit of loose, unconsolidated soil in the region. Weighted overlay method has been used to create soil amplification susceptibility map for the coastal Odisha. The Mahanadi basin shows dominant structural control on seismic activity. Lineament patterns are mostly directed in the WNW–ESE, NE–SW and NNW–SSE directions and may induce elongation of isoseismic patterns. The analysis also shows that the western, northern and middle parts of the study region have low to moderate susceptibility whereas the coastal Odisha have high susceptibility for seismic amplification due to thick unconsolidated sediment accumulation.


Seismic hazard Soil amplification GIS Lineament Odisha 



The work is completed at Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar. The faculty and research scholars of School of Earth, Ocean and Climate Sciences, IIT Bhubaneswar, are gratefully acknowledged for their valuable suggestions during this work. The work was partially supported by projects GP069, and SP088 to AKR. 


  1. Ali SA, Pirasteh S (2004) Geological applications of Landsat enhanced thematic mapper (ETM) data and geographic information system (GIS): mapping and structural interpretation in south-west Iran, Zagros structural belt. Int J Remote Sens 25:4715–4727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balachandar D, Alaguraja P, Sundaraj P, Rutharvelmurthy K, Kumaraswamy K (2010) Application of remote sensing and GIS for artificial recharge zone in Sivaganga District, Tamilnadu, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 1(1):84–97Google Scholar
  3. BIS (1893-2002) Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure, part 1; general provisions and buildings. Bureau of Indian standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. Carver SJ (1991) Integrating multicriteria evaluation with geographical information systems. Int J Geograph Inf Syst 5(3):321–339.  10.1080/02693799108927858 Google Scholar
  5. Crampin S (1981) A review of wave motion in anisotropic and cracked elastic media. Wave Motion 3:343–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehret D, Hannich D (2004) Seismic microzonation based on geotechnical parameters—estimation of site effects in Bucharest (Romania), EOS T. Am Geophys Un, San Francisco, 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract S43A-0972Google Scholar
  7. Giulio GD, Marzorati S, Bergamaschi F, Bordoni P, Cara FD, Alema E, Ladina C, Massa M, The L’Aquila Experiment Team (2011) Local variability of the ground shaking during the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake (April 6, 2009—Mw 6.3): the case study of Onna and Monticchio villages. Bull Earthq Eng 9:783–807. doi: 10.1007/s10518-011-9243-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gupta S (2012) Strain localization, granulite formation and geodynamic setting of ‘hot orogens’: case study from the Eastern Ghats Province, India. Geol J 47:334–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta S, Mohanty WK, Mandal A, Misra S (2014) Ancient terrain boundaries as probable seismic hazards: a case study from the northern boundary of the Eastern Ghats Belt, India. Geosci Front 5:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2006) Probabilistic modeling of earthquake hazard in stable continental shield of the Indian peninsula. ISET J Earthq Technol 43(3):49–64Google Scholar
  11. Jansssen R, Rietveld P (1990) Multicriteria analysis and GIS: an application to agricultural landuse in the Netherlands. Geogr Inf Syst Urban Reg Plan GeoJ Libr 17:129–139Google Scholar
  12. Jordan G, Meijninger BML, Van Hinsbergen DJJ, Meulenkamp JE, Van Dijk PM (2005) Extraction of morphotectonic features from DEMs: development and applications for study areas in Hungary and NW Greece. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 7:163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levchenko OV (1989) Tectonic aspects of intraplate seismicity in the northeastern Indian Ocean. Tectonophysics 170:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahalik NK (1994) Geology of the contact between the Eastern Ghats Belt and North Odisha craton, India. J Geol Soc India 44:41–51Google Scholar
  15. Mazumder R, Van Loon AJ, Mallik L, Reddy SM, Arima M, Altermann W, Eriksson PG, De S (2012) Mesoarchaean—Palaeoproterozoic stratigraphic record of the Singhbhum crustal province, eastern India: a synthesis. In: Mazumder R, Saha D (eds) Palaeoproterozoic of India, vol 365. Geological Society, London, pp 31–49Google Scholar
  16. Mohanty WK, Walling MY, Vaccari F, Tripathy T, Panza GF (2009) Modelling of SH- and P-SV- wave fields and seismic microzonation based on response spectra for Talchir basin, India. Eng Geol 104:84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mukhopadhayay A, Chaudhuri PN, Banerji AL (1984) Contemporaneous intrabasinal faulting in Gondwana Basin—the Jurabaga fault of lb River Coalfield, a type example. J Geol Soc India 25:557–563Google Scholar
  18. Mukhopadhyay J, Beukes NJ, Armstrong RA, Zimmermann U, Ghosh G, Medda RA (2008) Dating the oldest Greenstone in India: a 3.51 Ga precise U-Pb SHRIMP Zircon Age for Dacitic Lava of the Southern Iron Ore Group, Singhbhum Craton. J Geol 116:449–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rai AK (2016) Frequency dependent scattering observed in P- and surface wave arrivals from south India. doi: 10.1007/s00024-016-1426-5
  20. Rai A, Tripathy S, Sahu SC (2015) The May 21st, 2014 Bay of Bengal earthquake: implications for intraplate stress regime. Curr Sci 108(9):1706–1712Google Scholar
  21. Riad PHS, Billib M, Hassan AA, Salam MA, El Din MN (2011) Application of the overlay weighted model and boolean logic to determine the best locations for artificial recharge of groundwater. J Urban Environ Eng 5(2):57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schneider G (2004) Erdbeben – Eine Einführung für Geowissenschaftler und Bauingenieure, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, München (in German)Google Scholar
  23. Stefouli M, Osmaston H (1986) The analysis of linear geologic features on Landsat images of Crete. J Br Interplanet Soc 39:546–551Google Scholar
  24. Tait J, Zimmermann U, Miyazaki T, Presnyakov S, Chang Q, Mukhopadhyay J, Sergeev S (2011) Possible juvenile Palaeoarchaean TTG magmatism in eastern India and its constraints for the evolution of the Singhbhum craton. Geol Mag 148:340–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Theilen-Willige B (2010) Detection of local site conditions influencing earthquake shaking and secondary effects in Southwest-Haiti using remote sensing and GIS-methods. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1183–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Earth, Ocean and Climate ScienceIndian Institute of Technology BhubaneswarKhurdaIndia

Personalised recommendations