Natural Hazards

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 807–828 | Cite as

Effect of critical thinking disposition on household earthquake preparedness

Original Paper


Critical thinking is a form of open-minded thinking that aims to gain insight into how to improve things. The focus is on criticism and applicability of the resultant knowledge. Despite the existence of theories linking the critical thinking disposition and hazard adjustment adoption, there have been no previous studies examining the association between this disposition and household earthquake preparedness. The present study intends to identify this association. Data were collected from 598 respondents through a questionnaire survey. Household earthquake preparedness was measured by the number of adjustments adopted in the household. In regression analysis, taking into account interactions between the considered variables, it was found that logical thinking awareness, a subconstruct of the critical thinking disposition, was a significant predictor of household preparedness. Furthermore, inquisitiveness, another subconstruct of critical thinking disposition, was found to moderate the association between risk perception and earthquake preparedness. This finding suggests that people who have the motivation to tackle challenging situations actually do so in the context of earthquake preparedness. The practical implications of the findings are also discussed.


Critical thinking disposition Interaction effect Regression analysis Adoption of hazard adjustment Earthquake Household 



The author acknowledges support from the Watanabe Memorial Foundation for the Advancement of New Technology (#H26-351). The author is also grateful to Professor Ryo Kimura (Director of Research Department, Kochi University of Technology) for his varied support.


  1. Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds) Action control: from cognition to behaviour. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asgary A, Willis KG (1997) Household behavior in response to earthquake risk: an assessment of alternative theories. Disasters 21:354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailin S, Case R, Coombs JR, Daniels LB (1999) Conceptualizing critical thinking. J Curric Stud 31(3):285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baytiyeh H, Naja MK (2014) Can education reduce Middle Eastern fatalistic attitude regarding earthquake disasters? Disaster Prev Manag 23(4):343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR (2012) A model of household preparedness for earthquakes: how individuals make meaning of earthquake information and how this influences preparedness. Nat Hazards 64(1):107–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker J, Paton D, Johnston D, Ronan K (2013) Salient beliefs about earthquake hazards and household preparedness. Risk Anal 33(9):1710–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennette C, Vickers A (2012) Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brookfield SD (1987) Developing critical thinkers. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Bubeck P, Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH (2012) A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior. Risk Anal 32(9):1481–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colucciello ML (1997) Critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students—A conceptual model for evaluation. J Prof Nurs 13(4):236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durand CP (2013) Does raising Type 1 error rate improve power to detect interactions in linear regression models? A simulation study. PLoS ONE 8(8):e71079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duval TS, Mulilis J-P (1999) A person-relative-to-event (pre) approach to negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a field study. J Appl Soc Psychol 29(3):495–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Facione NC, Facione PA, Sanchez CA (1994) Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: the development of California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. J Nurs Educ 33:345–350Google Scholar
  15. Facione PA, Sanchez CA, Facione NC, Gainen J (1995) The disposition toward critical thinking. J Gen Educ 44(1):1–25Google Scholar
  16. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrison DR (1991) Critical thinking and adult education: a conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. Int J Lifelong Educ 10(4):287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ge Y, Peacock WG, Lindell MK (2011) Florida households’ expected responses to hurricane hazard mitigation incentives. Risk Anal 31(10):1676–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirayama R, Kusumi T (2004) Effect of critical thinking disposition on interpretation of controversial issues: evaluating evidences and drawing conclusions. Jpn J Educ Psychol 52:186–198 (In Japanese.) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindell MK, Perry RW (1992) Behavioural foundations of community emergency planning. Hemisphere Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindell MK, Perry RW (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environ Behav 32(4):461–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindell MK, Perry RW (2012) The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal 32(4):616–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McPeck JE (1981) Critical thinking and education. Martin Robertson, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Mileti DS, O’Brien P (1992) Warnings during disaster: normalizing communicated risk. Soc Probl 39:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulilis J-P (1996) Social considerations of disaster-resistant technology: the person-relative-to-event (pre) model of coping with threat. J Urban Technol 3(3):59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mulilis J-P, Duval TS (1995) Negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a person-relative-to-event (pre) model of coping with threat. J Appl Soc Psychol 25(15):1319–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mulilis J-P, Duval TS (1997) The PrE model of coping and tornado preparedness: moderating effects of responsibility. J Appl Soc Psychol 27(19):1750–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mulilis J-P, Duval TS (2003) Activating effects of resources relative to threat and responsibility in person-relative-to-event theory of coping with threat: an educational application. J Appl Soc Psychol 33(7):1437–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mulilis J-P, Lippa R (1990) Behavioral change in earthquake preparedness due to negative threat appeals: a test of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 20(8, Pt 1):619–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulilis J-P, Duval TS, Bovalino K (2000) Tornado preparedness of students, nonstudent renters, and nonstudent owners: issues of pre theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 30(6):1310–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mulilis J-P, Duval TS, Rogers R (2003) The effect of a swarm of local tornados on tornado preparedness: a quasi-comparable cohort investigation. J Appl Soc Psychol 33(8):1716–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (2001) Survey on attitudes toward science and technology. NISTEP Report No. 72 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  33. Palm R (1998) Urban earthquake hazards. Appl Geogr 18:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rapps J, Riegel B, Glaser D (2001) Testing a predictive model of what makes a critical thinker. West J Nurs Res 23(6):610–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers RW (1983) Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppa J, Petty R (eds) Social psychophysiology. Guildford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Shen L (2009) The psychometric property and validation of a fatalism scale. Psychol Health 24(5):597–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tekeli-Yeşil S, Dedeoğlu N, Braun-Fahrlaender C, Tanner M (2010) Factors motivating individuals to take precautionary action for an expected earthquake in Istanbul. Risk Anal 30(8):1181–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weinstein ND, Nicolich M (1993) Correct and incorrect interpretation of correlations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Health Psychol 12:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and EconomicsKochi University of TechnologyKochi CityJapan

Personalised recommendations