Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Attenuation relation predicted observed ground motion of Gorkha Nepal earthquake of April 25, 2015

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses comparison of recent observed ground motion parameters of Gorkha Nepal earthquake of April 25, 2015 (M w 7.8) with the predicted ground motion parameters using existing attenuation relation of the Himalayan region. The earthquake took about 8000 lives and destroyed thousands of buildings of poor quality, and the earthquake was felt by millions of people living in Nepal, China, India, Bangladesh, and Bhutan. The knowledge of ground parameters is very important in developing seismic code of seismic-prone regions like Himalaya for better design of buildings. The ground parameters recorded in recent earthquake event and aftershocks are compared with attenuation relations for the Himalayan region, and the predicted ground motion parameters show good correlation with the observed ground parameters. The results discussed in this paper will be of great use to civil engineers in updating existing building codes in the Himalayan and surrounding regions and also for the evaluation of seismic hazards. The results clearly show that the attenuation relation developed for the Himalayan region should only be used, and other attenuation relations based on other regions fail to provide good estimate of observed ground motion parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (2008) Summary of the Abrahamson and Sliva NGA ground-motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24(1):67–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aman A, Singh UK, Singh RP (1995) A new empirical relation for strong seismic ground motion for the Himalayan region. Curr Sci 69(9):772–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America. Bull Seism Soc Am 96:2181–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R (2015) Seismology: raising kathmandu. Nat Geosci 8:582–584. doi:10.1038/ngeo2498

  • BIS Code (2002) Earthquake hazard zoning map of India. www.bis.org.in

  • Bodin P et al (2004) Ground motion scaling in the Kachchh basin, India, deduced from aftershocks of the 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(5):1658–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM (2009) Comparing stochastic point source and finite-source ground motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM. Bull Seism Soc Am 99(6):3202–3216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-Motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-Damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 and 10.0s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5 % damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthq Spectra 24(1):139–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24(1):173–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Kumar V, Suthar A, Kumar P (2012) Modeling of strong ground motions for 1991 Uttarkashi, 1999 Chamoli earthquakes, and a hypothetical great earthquake in Garhwal-Kumaun Himalaya. Nat Hazards 64:1141–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Gupta ID, Gupta VK (2006) A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Northeast India. Earthq Spectra 22(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta ID (2010) Response spectral attenuation relations for in-slab earthquakes in Indo-Burmese subduction zone. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30(5):368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1942) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 32(3):163–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar RN, Raghukanth STH (2004) Attenuation of strong ground motion in peninsular India. Seismol Res Lett 75(4):530–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Roshan RD, Arlekar JN. Basu PC (2000) Empirical attenuation relationships for the Himalayan earthquakes based on Indian strong-motion data. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on seismic zonation, Palm Spring, CA, USA, 12–15

  • Lindsey EO, Natsuaki R, Xu X, Shimada M, Hashimoto H, Melgar D, Sandwell DT (2015) Line of sight deformation from ALOS-2 interferometry: Mw 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake and Mw 7.3 aftershock. Geophys Res Lett. doi:10.1002/2015GL065385

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal P, Kumar N, Murthy CS, Raju IP (2009) Ground motion attenuation relation from strong motion records of the 2001 Mw = 7.7 Bhuj Earthquake sequence (2001–2006), Gujarat, India. Pure Appl Geophys 166(3):451–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin SM, Hough S (2015) The 21 May 2014 Mw 5.9 Bay of Bengal earthquake: macroseismic data suggest a high-stress-drop event. Seismol Res Lett 86(2A):369–377. doi:10.1785/0220140155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Walter S (2010) A catalog of felt intensity data for 570 earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(2):562–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal H, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar R (2015) Analysis of ground motion in Delhi from earthquakes recorded by strong motion network. Arab J Geosci 8:2005–2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P, Tapponnier P (1975) Cenozoic tectonics of Asia: effects of a continental collision. Science 189:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P, Tapponnier P (1978) Active tectonics of Tibet. J Geophys Res 83:5361–5374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Raj A, Thingbaijam KKS, Kumar A (2009) Ground motion synthesis and seismic scenario in Guwahati city—a stochastic approach. Seismol Res Lett 80(2):233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez IA, Gusev A, Panza GF, Petukhin A (2001) Preliminary determination of the interdependence among strong motion amplitude, earthquake magnitude and hypocentral distance for the Himalayan region. Geophys J Int 144:577–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil NS, Das J, Kumar A, Rout MM, Das R (2014) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Himachal Pradesh and adjoining regions. J Earth Syst Sci 123–1:49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip GM, Watson DF (1982) A precise method for determining contoured surfaces. Aust Pet Explor As J 22:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Kavitha B (2014) Ground motion relations for active regions in India. Pure Appl Geophys 171:2241–2275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadigh K, Chang CY, Egan JA, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68:180–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma ML (1998) Attenuation relationship for estimation of peak ground horizontal acceleration using data from strong motion arrays in India. Bull Seism Soc Am 88:1063–1069

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma B, Teotia SS, Kumar D (2007) Attenuation of P, S, and coda waves in Koyna region, India. J Seismol 11:327–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Aman A, Prasad YJJ (1996) Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Himalayan Region. Pure Appl Geophys 147(1):161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre TL, Monsalve G, Sheehan AF, Sapkota S, Wu F (2007) Earthquake processes of the Himalayan collision zone in eastern Nepal and the southern Tibetan plateau. Geophys J Int 171:718–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya KS (1980) The two intracrustal boundary thrusts of the Himalaya. Tectonophysics 66:323–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JX, Zhang J, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H, Irikura K, Thio HK, Somerville PG, Fukushima Y (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(3):898–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to USGS, Google Earth, NEIC, IRIS, CESMD, and EMSC for making ground motion data and terrain image available. We are grateful to the two anonymous referees and the Chief Editor for their valuable comments/suggestions that have helped to improve earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Earthquake Center, Damascus, Syria

    Raed Ahmad

  2. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, 92866, USA

    Ramesh P. Singh

Authors
  1. Raed Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramesh P. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramesh P. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, R., Singh, R.P. Attenuation relation predicted observed ground motion of Gorkha Nepal earthquake of April 25, 2015. Nat Hazards 80, 311–328 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1969-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1969-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation