Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 79, Issue 3, pp 1809–1824 | Cite as

Post-earthquake allocation approach of medical rescue teams

  • Xiang Chu
  • QiuYan Zhong
Original Paper

Abstract

Earthquakes result in overwhelming demand for medical resources at once, and affected areas requires reinforcement from neighbor cities. An effective allocation approach of medical rescue teams in early stage of disaster relief can improve rescue performance significantly. To find optimal allocation strategy, an integer nonlinear programming model is established, following utility principle. To construct the optimization model, stochastic transition probability of triage levels is introduced. Meanwhile, function from allocation scheme to fatalities of areas is established. Next, we design algorithm based on Lingo software to find solution of utility model. Finally, numerical experiments based on real data in 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China are used to compare utility approach with existing approaches in practice. The results of experiments indicate that: (1) to save more lives, a support team should preferentially be allocated to a worse and nearer affected area. When the worst area is not the nearest, the team also may be sent to an area with moderate severity and moderate distance. (2) Compared with severity strategy and distance strategy, utility strategy improves rescue efficiency significantly.

Keywords

Medical rescue team allocation Fatalities Multiple areas Earthquake 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by National Science Foundation of China (No. 91024029).

References

  1. Ajami S, Fattahi M (2009) The role of earthquake information management systems (EIMSs) in reducing destruction: a comparative study of Japan, Turkey and Iran. Disaster Prev Manag 18:150–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altay N, Green WG (2006) OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur J Oper Res 175:475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong JH, Frykberg ER, Burris D (2008) Toward a national standard in primary mass casualty triage. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2(s1):8–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao H, Huang S (2012) Principles of scarce medical resource allocation in natural disaster relief: a simulation approach. Med Decis Making 32:470–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlos C (2011) Effective patient prioritization in mass casualty incidents using hyper heuristics and the pilot method. OR Spectrum 33:699–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu X, Zhong QY, Khokhar SG (2015) Triage scheduling optimization for mass casualty and disaster response. Asia Pacif J Oper Res. doi: 10.1142/S0217595915500414 Google Scholar
  7. Felix W, Guido S, Stefan F et al (2014) Emergency response in natural disaster management: allocation and scheduling of rescue units. Eur J Oper Res 235:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng L, Wang LM, Chen L et al (2009) Method of triage and remedy for earthquake casualties. Mod Med Health 25:323–325 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  9. Fiedrich F, Gehbauer F, Rickers U (2000) Optimized resource allocation for emergency response after earthquake disasters. Saf Sci 35:41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frykberg ER (2004) Principles of mass casualty management following terrorist disasters. Ann Surg 239:319–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hina A, Raghu TS, Vinze A (2010) Resource allocation for demand surge mitigation during disaster response. Decis Support Syst 50:304–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horner MW, Downs JA (2010) Optimizing hurricane disaster relief goods distribution: model development and application with respect to planning strategies. Disasters 34:821–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu WJ, Zhao WH, Li YF et al (2010) Analysis of emergency medical staging in Wenchuan earthquake casualty treatment. Pract J Clin Med 7:20–24 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  14. Huseyin OM, Zelda BZ (2010) Stochastic optimization of medical supply location and distribution in disaster management. Int J Prod Econ 126:76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iserson KV, Moskop JC (2007) Triage in medicine, part I: concept, history, and types. Ann Emerg Med 49:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jian HS, Ma JF (2010) Significance of casualty time curve in medical rescue of Wenchuan earthquake. J Traum Surg 12:535–537 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  17. Jiang YW, Zhang JC, Zhong Y et al (2008) Summary of triage after Wenchuan earthquake in 2 weeks. Chin J Evid Based Med 8:722–725 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  18. John CM, Kenneth VI (2007) Triage in medicine, part II: underlying values and principles. Ann Emerg Med 49(3):282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lei BL, Zhou Y, Zhu Y et al (2008) The emergency response of medical rescue in the worst-hit Mianyang areas after Wenchuan earthquake. Chin J Evid Based Med 8:581–587 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  20. Narjès BS, Tarek BM, Julie D et al (2006) Assessing large scale emergency rescue plans: an agent based approach. Int J Intell Control Syst 11:260–271Google Scholar
  21. Pamela CN, Karl FD, Richard FH (2010) Water distribution in disaster relief. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 40:693–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson DT, Hawe GI, Coates G et al (2013) A multi-objective combinatorial model of casualty processing in major incident response. Eur J Oper Res 230:643–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang JH, Li J, Liu ZP (2012) Multiple-resource and multiple-depot emergency response problem considering secondary disasters. Expert Syst Appl 39:11066–11071CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management Science and EngineeringDalian University of TechnologyDa LianChina

Personalised recommendations