Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 333–354 | Cite as

Slushflows: science and planning considerations for an expanding hazard

  • Grace Relf
  • James M. Kendra
  • Robert M. Schwartz
  • Daniel J. Leathers
  • Delphis F. Levia
Original Paper

Abstract

Slushflows are natural hazards that pose considerable danger to communities across the globe. These events are characterized by the rapid mass movement of water-inundated snow downslope, and they cause economic damage as well as fatalities in many different climates and regions. As the global climate changes and human populations and industries potentially expand to higher latitudes, it will be important to fully understand the slushflow hazard since an anticipated increase in the frequency of rain-on-snow events and an earlier spring thaw would likely increase the probability of slushflows. This article: (1) summarizes the factors that favor the development of slushflows; (2) discusses the hazard management implications of slushflows; (3) examines the policies employed to prevent and mitigate slushflow damage; and (4) sets out the need for modifications in hazard management systems. Conclusions drawn hope to address future research needs in an effort to create policies that better suit the needs of at-risk communities.

Keywords

Snow Rain Rain-on-snow Slushflow Vulnerability Hazard management 

References

  1. Aguirre BE (no date) Planning, warning, evacuation, and search and rescue: a review of the social science research literature. Department of Sociology, College Station, Texas A & M UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguirre BE, Wenger D, Vigo G (1998) A test of the emergent norm theory of collective behavior. Sociol Forum 13(2):301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burby RJ, Wagner F (1996) Protecting tourists from death and injury in coastal storms. Disasters 20:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton I, Kates RW, White BF (1993) The environment as hazard, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York, p 290Google Scholar
  5. Carey M, Huggel C, Bury J, Portocarrero C, Haeberli W (2012) An integrated socio-environmental framework for glacier hazard management and climate change adaptation: lessons from Lake 513, Cordillera Blanca, Peru. Clim Change 112(3–4):733–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clow DW (2010) Changes in the timing of snowmelt and streamflow in Colorado: a response to recent warming. J Clim 23:2293–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutter SL, Finch C (2008) Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(7):2301–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Change 18:598–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daines GE (1991) Planning, training, and exercising. In: Drabek TE, Hoetmer GJ (eds) Emergency management: principles and practice for local government. ICMA, Washington, pp 161–200Google Scholar
  11. Dow K, Cutter SL (1998) Crying wolf: repeat responses to hurricane evacuation orders. Coast Manag 26:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drabek TE (1991) Microcomputers in emergency management. Monograph No. 51. Program on environment and behavior. Institute of Behavioral Science. University of ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  13. Dynes RR, Quarantelli EL (1973) The family and community context of individual reactions to disaster. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Preliminary Paper #10Google Scholar
  14. Eckerstorfer M, Christiansen HH (2012) Meteorology, topography and snowpack conditions causing two extreme mid-winter slush and wet slab avalanche periods in high Arctic maritime Svalbard. Permafr Periglac Process 23(1):15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eitzinger C, Wiedemann P (2007) Risk perceptions in the alpine tourist destination Tyrol—an exploratory analysis of residents’ views. Tour Manag 28:911–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enarson E, Scanlon J (1999) Gender patterns in flood evacuation: a case study in Canada’s Red River Valley. Appl Behav Sci Rev 7:103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. FEMA (2010) Comprehensive preparedness guide (CPG) 101.Version 2.0Google Scholar
  18. FEMA (2011) Emergency planning. Independent study course 235b. Federal Emergency Management Agency, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer H (1998) Response to disaster: fact versus fiction and its perpetuation: the sociology of disaster. University Presses of America, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 9:127–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuchs S, Thoeni M, McAlpin MC, Gruber U, Bründl M (2007) Avalanche hazard mitigation strategies assessed by cost effectiveness analyses and cost benefit analyses—evidence from Davos, Switzerland. Nat Hazards 41(1):113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galea ER (2002) Simulating evacuation and circulation in planes, trains, buildings and ships using the EXODUS software. In: Schreckenberg M, Sharma SD (eds) Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics. Springer, New York, pp 203–225Google Scholar
  23. Gladwin H, Peacock WG (1997) Warning and evacuation: a night for hard houses. In: Peacock WG, Morrow BH, Gladwin H (eds) Hurricane Andrew: ethnicity, gender, and the sociology of disasters. International Hurricane Center, Miami, pp 52–74Google Scholar
  24. Godschalk DR (1991) Disaster mitigation and hazard management. In: Hoetmer GJ, Drabek TE (eds) Emergency management: principles and practice for local government. International City Management Association, Washington, pp 131–160Google Scholar
  25. Hestnes E, Bakkehoi S (2004) Slushflow hazard prediction and warning. Ann Glaciol 38:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hestnes E, Bakkehoi S, Sandersen F, Anderson L (1994) Weather and snowpack conditions essential to slushflow release and downslope propagation. In: Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, Snowbird, Utah, USA, pp 40–57Google Scholar
  27. Hewitt K and Burton I (1971) The hazardousness of a place: a regional ecology of damaging events. Department of Geography Research Publication 6, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill AA, Cutter SL (2002) Methods for determining disaster proneness. In: Cutter SL (ed) American hazardscapes: the regionalization of hazards and disasters. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, pp 13–16Google Scholar
  29. Holub M, Fuchs S (2009) Mitigating mountain hazards in Austria—legislation, risk transfer, and awareness building. Nat Hazard Earth Syst 9(2):523–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holub M, Suda J, Fuchs S (2012) Mountain hazards: reducing vulnerability by adapted building design. Environ Earth Sci 66(7):1853–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hürlimann M, Copons R, Altimir J (2006) Detailed debris flow hazard assessment in Andorra: a multidisciplinary approach. Geomorphology 78(3–4):359–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaedicke C, Kern M, Gauer P, Baillifard M, Platzer K (2008) Chute experiments on slushflow dynamics. Cold Reg Sci Technol 51(2–3):156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones JAA (1999) Climate change and sustainable water resources: placing the threat of global warming in perspective. Hydrol Sci J 44:541–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keiler M, Kellerer-Pirklbauer A, Otto J-C (2012) Concepts and implications of environmental change and human impact: studies from Austrian geomorphological research. Geogr Ann A 94(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kendra J, Rozdilsky J, McEntire DA (2008) Evacuating large urban areas: Challenges for emergency management policies and concepts. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 5: Article 32Google Scholar
  36. Larocque SJ, Hetu B, Filion L (2001) Geomorphic and dendroecological impacts of slushflows in central Gaspe Peninsula (Quebec, Canada). Geogr Ann A 83(4):191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leiter A (2011) The sense of snow—individuals’ perception of fatal avalanche events. J Environ Psychol 31(4):361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levia DF, Leathers DJ (2011) Rain-induced snowmelt. In: Singh VP, Singh P, Haritashya UK (eds) Encyclopedia of snow, ice and glaciers. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 915–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lima ML (2004) On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator. J Environ Psychol 24:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindell MK, Perry RW (2012) The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal 32:616–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mileti D (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. Mileti DS, Sotensen JH (1988) Planning and implementing warning systems. In: Lystad M (ed) Mental health response to mass emergencies. Brunner/Mazel, New York, pp 321–345Google Scholar
  43. Mitchell JK (1990) Human dimensions of environmental hazards: complexity, disparity, and the search for guidance. In: Kirby A (ed) Nothing to fear: risks and hazards in American society. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 131–178Google Scholar
  44. Mitchell JK (1996) Improving community responses to industrial disasters. In: Mitchell JK (ed) The long road to recovery: community responses to industrial disasters. United Nations University Press, New York, pp 10–40Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell JK (2006) The primacy of partnership: scoping a new national disaster recovery policy. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604:228–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nyberg R, Rapp A (1998) Extreme erosional events and natural hazards in the Scandinavian mountains. Ambio 27(4):292–299Google Scholar
  47. Onesti LJ, Hestnes E (1989) Slush-flow questionnaire. Ann Glaciol 13:226–230Google Scholar
  48. Parker DJ, Handmer JW (1998) The role of unofficial flood warning systems. J Conting Crisis Manag 6:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rapp A (1995) Case studies of geoprocesses and environmental change in mountains of northern Sweden. Geogr Ann A 77(4):189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rodríguez H, Wachtendorf T, Kendra J, Trainor J (2006) A snapshot of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami: societal impacts and consequences. Disaster Prev Manag 15:163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scherer D, Gude M, Gempeler M, Parlow E (1998) Atmospheric and hydrological boundary conditions for slushflow initiation due to snowmelt. Ann Glaciol 26:377–380Google Scholar
  52. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sorensen J (2002) Risk communication and disaster warning: lessons for counter-terrorism. national academy of sciences forum: countering terrorism: lessons learned from natural and technological. Disasters 28:2002Google Scholar
  54. Stimberis J, Rubin CM (2011) Glide avalanche response to an extreme rain-on-snow event, Snoqualmie Pass, Washington, USA. J Glaciol 57:468–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Trainor J, Murray-Tuite P, Edara P, Fallah-Fini S, Triantis K (2013) Interdisciplinary approach to evacuation modeling. Nat Hazards Rev 14:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003a) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turner BL, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Chistensen EL, Eckley N, Hovelsrud-Broda GK, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Luers A, Martello ML, Mathiesen S, Naylor R, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A, Selin H, Tyler N (2003b) Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8080–8085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Varnes D (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. Wenger DE, Weller JM (1973) Disaster subcultures: the cultural residues of community disasters. University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center. Preliminary Paper # 9Google Scholar
  60. White GF (1973) Natural hazards research. In: Chorley RJ (ed) Directions in geography. Methuen, London, pp 193–216Google Scholar
  61. Wood MM, Mileti DS, Kano M, Kelley MM, Regan R, Bourque LB (2012) Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards. Risk Anal 32:601–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grace Relf
    • 1
    • 6
  • James M. Kendra
    • 2
  • Robert M. Schwartz
    • 3
  • Daniel J. Leathers
    • 4
  • Delphis F. Levia
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Center for Energy and Environmental PolicyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Disaster Research CenterUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  3. 3.Center for Emergency Management and Homeland Security Policy ResearchThe University of AkronAkronUSA
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  5. 5.Department of Plant and Soil SciencesUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  6. 6.School for International and Public Affairs and the Earth InstituteColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations