Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 19–39 | Cite as

The Pattern Method for incorporating tidal uncertainty into probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment (PTHA)

  • Loyce M. Adams
  • Randall J. LeVeque
  • Frank I. González
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a general framework for incorporating tidal uncertainty into probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment and propose the Pattern Method and a simpler special case called the \(\Delta t\) Method as effective approaches. The general framework also covers the method developed by Mofjeld et al. (J Atmos Ocean Technol 24(1):117–123, 2007) that was used for the 2009 Seaside, Oregon probabilistic study by González et al. (J Geophys Res 114(C11):023, 2009). We show that the Pattern Method is superior to past approaches because it takes advantage of our ability to run the tsunami simulation at multiple tide stages and uses the time history of flow depth at strategic gauge locations to infer the temporal pattern of waves that is unique to each tsunami source. Combining these patterns with knowledge of the tide cycle at a particular location improves the ability to estimate the probability that a wave will arrive at a time when the tidal stage is sufficiently large that a quantity of interest such as the maximum flow depth exceeds a specified level. Python scripts to accompany this paper are available at DOI  10.5281/zenodo.12406.

Keywords

PTHA Hazard curves 100-yr flood GeoClaw  Probabilistic tidal uncertainty 

Mathematics Subject Classification

86-08 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was done as a Pilot Study funded by BakerAECOM. Partial funding was also provided by NSF Grants DMS-0914942 and DMS-1216732 of the second author and involvement of the second and third authors in NSF Hazards SEES project EAR-1331412.

References

  1. Adams L, LeVeque R, González FI (2013) Incorporating tidal uncertainty into probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment (ptha) for Crescent City, CA. Final Tidal Report for Phase I PTHA of Crescent City, CA, supported by FEMA Risk MAP Program. http://faculty.washington.edu/lma3/AGU2013
  2. Androsov A, Behrens J, Danilov S (2011) Tsunami modelling with unstructured grids. Interaction between tides and tsunami waves. In: Computational science and high performance computing IV. Springer, pp 191–206. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-17770-5_15
  3. Berger MJ, George DL, LeVeque RJ, Mandli KT (2010) The GeoClaw software for depth-averaged flows with adaptive refinement. Preprint and simulations. www.clawpack.org/links/papers/awr10.
  4. González FI, Geist EL, Jaffe B, Kanoglu U et al (2009) Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment at Seaside, Oregon, for near-and far-field seismic sources. J Geophys Res 114(C11):023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. González FI, LeVeque RJ, Adams L (2013) Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment (PTHA) for Crescent City, CA, Final Report on Phase 1. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/22366
  6. Houston JR, Garcia AW (1978) Type 16 flood insurance study: tsunami predictions for the West Coast of the continental United States, Crescent City, CA. USACE Waterways Experimental Station Tech. Report H-78-26.Google Scholar
  7. Kowalik Z, Proshutinsky A (2010) Tsunami–tide interactions: a Cook Inlet case study. Cont Shelf Res 30:633–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kowalik Z, Proshutinsky T, Proshutinsky A (2006) Tide–tsunami interactions. Sci Tsunami Hazards 24(4):242–256. http://library.lanl.gov/tsunami/244/kowalik.pdf
  9. LeVeque RJ, George DL, Berger MJ (2011) Tsunami modeling with adaptively refined finite volume methods. Acta Numer 20:211–289Google Scholar
  10. Mofjeld H, González F, Titov V, Venturato A, Newman J (2007) Effects of tides on maximum tsunami wave heights: probability distributions. J Atmos Ocean Technol 24(1):117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Soloviev S (2011) Recurrence of tsunamis in the Pacific. In: Adams WM (ed) Tsunamis in the Pacific Ocean. East-West Center Press, Honolulu, pp 149–163Google Scholar
  12. Synolakis CE, Legg MR, Borrero JC (2004) Tsunami sources in the southern California bight. Geophys Res Lett 31:L13,211. doi: 10.1029/2004GL020078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van Dorn W (1984) Some tsunami characteristics deducible from tide records. J Phys Ocean 14:353–363Google Scholar
  14. Witter RC, Zhang Y, Wang K, Priest GR, Goldfinger C, Stimely LL, English JT, Ferro PA (2011) Simulating tsunami inundation at Bandon, Coos County, Oregon, using hypothetical Cascadia and Alaska earthquake scenarios. DOGAMI Special Paper 43Google Scholar
  15. Zhang Y, Witter R, Priest G (2011) Tsunami–tide interaction in 1964 Prince William Sound tsunami. Ocean Model 40:246–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Loyce M. Adams
    • 1
  • Randall J. LeVeque
    • 1
  • Frank I. González
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Space SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations