Natural Hazards

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 1853–1869 | Cite as

Influencing factors of households disadvantaged in post-earthquake life recovery: a case study of the Wenchuan earthquake in China

Original Paper


Post-disaster recovery plans and policies can be better made after understanding which households are in the greatest need of help and support in post-disaster life recovery. In this study, we analyzed influencing factors of households with a disadvantaged status of life recovery, which could then be used as indicators for detecting households in urgent need of help at the beginning of post-disaster recovery. Based on life recovery field survey data from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, we found 81 disadvantaged households, identified by the fact that they lagged behind in the post-earthquake life recovery process. Using logit regression, we analyzed the influencing factors of disadvantaged households that may distinguish them from more prosperous ones. The results showed that the lower economic status, longer duration of unemployment, loss of loved ones and the less education are the significant influencing factors of disadvantaged households. Therefore, the poor and unemployed households who are less educated and suffered the trauma of losing loved ones should be made a priority in post-disaster recovery planning and policy making in consideration of their disadvantaged status in life recovery.


Disadvantaged households Life recovery Earthquake China 



This research is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41271544), and the National Key Technology R & D Program of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan of China (No. 2012BAK10B03). Several undergraduates from the Sichuan University contributed to this research.


  1. Akhtar R, Santos JR (2013) Risk-based input–output analysis of hurricane impacts on interdependent regional workforce systems. Nat Hazards 65(1):391–405. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0369-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson CL, Sapat AK (2014) Hurricane Wilma and long-term business recovery in disasters: the role of local government procurement and economic development. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 11(1):169–192. doi: 10.1515/jhsem-2013-0002 Google Scholar
  3. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolin RC, Bolton P (1983) Recovery in Nicaragua and the USA. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 1(1):125–152Google Scholar
  5. Bolin R, Stanford L (1991) Shelter, housing and recovery-a comparison of US disasters. Disasters 15(1):24–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00424.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bristow M (2008) Quake reveals softer side to China. BBC Website. Accessed 8 Nov 2013
  7. Brown D, Saito K, Liu M, Spence R, So E, Ramage M (2012) The use of remotely sensed data and ground survey tools to assess damage and monitor early recovery following the 12.5.2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Bull Earthq Eng 10(3):741–764. doi: 10.1007/s10518-011-9318-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen SH, Wu YC (2006) Changes of PTSD symptoms and school reconstruction: a two-year prospective study of children and adolescents after the Taiwan 921 earthquake. Nat Hazards 37(1–2):225–244. doi: 10.1007/s11069-005-4671-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. China Earthquake Administration (2008) Seismic intensity map of the M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake. Accessed 7 Aug 2013 (in Chinese)
  10. Comerio MC (1998) Disaster hits home: new policy for urban housing recovery. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Dong H (2009) Social investigations and statistics. Wuhan University Press, Wuhan (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Dyson ME (2006) Come hell or high water: Hurricane Katrina and the color of disaster. Basic Civitas Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Finch C, Emrich CT, Cutter SL (2010) Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Popul Environ 31(4):179–202. doi: 10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fothergill A, Peek LA (2004) Poverty and disasters in the United States: a review of recent sociological findings. Nat Hazards 32(1):89–110. doi: 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fothergill A, Maestas E, Darlington JD (1999) Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature. Disasters 23(2):156–173. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fussell E, Sastry N, Vanlandingham M (2010) Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Popul Environ 31(1–3SI):20–42. doi: 10.1007/s11111-009-0092-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green R, Bates LK, Smyth A (2007) Impediments to recovery in New Orleans’ upper and lower ninth ward: one year after Hurricane Katrina. Disasters 31(4):311–335. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2007.01011.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haas JE, Kates RW, Bowden MJ (1977) Reconstruction following disasters. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 147–204Google Scholar
  19. Han Z, Hu X, Nigg J (2011) How does disaster relief works affect the trust in local government? A study of the Wenchuan earthquake. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 2(4):1–20. doi: 10.2202/1944-4079.1092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirayama Y (2000) Collapse and reconstruction: housing recovery policy in Kobe after the Hanshin Great Earthquake. Hous Stud 15(1):111–128. doi: 10.1080/02673030082504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamel N, Loukaitou-Sideris A (2004) Residential assistance and recovery following the Northridge earthquake. Urban Stud 41(3):533–562. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000178672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ke X, Liu C, Li N (2010) Social support and quality of life: a cross-sectional study on survivors eight months after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. BMC Public Health 10(573):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-573 Google Scholar
  23. Kimura R (2007) Recovery and reconstruction calendar. J Disaster Res 2(6):465–474Google Scholar
  24. Li J, Crawford-Brown D, Syddall M, Guan D (2013) Modeling imbalanced economic recovery following a natural disaster using input–output analysis. Risk Anal 33(10):1908–1923. doi: 10.1111/risa.12040 Google Scholar
  25. Luft RE (2008) Through the eye of Katrina: social justice in the United States. Sociol Inq 78(2):258–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00238.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mccomb R, Moh Y, Schiller AR (2011) Measuring long-run economic effects of natural hazard. Nat Hazards 58(1):559–566. doi: 10.1007/s11069-010-9687-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mileti DS (1999) Disaster by design. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC, pp 228–239Google Scholar
  28. Msilimba GG (2010) The socioeconomic and environmental effects of the 2003 landslides in the Rumphi and Ntcheu Districts (Malawi). Nat Hazards 53(2):347–360. doi: 10.1007/s11069-009-9437-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mueller EJ, Bell H, Chang BB, Henneberger J (2011) Looking for home after Katrina: postdisaster housing policy and low-income survivors. J Plan Educ Res 31(3):291–307. doi: 10.1177/0739456X11413602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olshansky RB, Johnson LA, Horne J, Nee B (2008) Longer view: planning for the rebuilding of New Orleans. J Am Plan As 74(3):273–287. doi: 10.1080/01944360802140835 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Priebe S, Marchi F, Bini L, Flego M, Costa A, Galeazzi G (2011) Mental disorders, psychological symptoms and quality of life 8 years after an earthquake: findings from a community sample in Italy. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 46(7):615–621. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0227-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rathfon D, Davidson R, Bevington J, Vicini A, Hill A (2013) Quantitative assessment of post-disaster housing recovery: a case study of Punta Gorda, Florida, after Hurricane Charley. Disasters 37(2):333–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01305.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schrank HL, Marshall MI, Hall-Phillips A, Wiatt RF, Jones NE (2013) Small-business demise and recovery after Katrina: rate of survival and demise. Nat Hazards 65(3):2353–2374. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0480-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. State Council (2008) Regulations on post-Wenchuan-earthquake restoration and reconstruction. Accessed 8 Nov 2013 (in Chinese)
  35. State Council (2011) Premier Wen Jiabao’s speech on the forum of Wenchuan earthquake restoration and reconstruction. Accessed 8 Nov 2013 (in Chinese)
  36. Takeda J, Tamura K, Tatsuki S (2003) Life recovery of 1995 Kobe Earthquake survivors in Nishinomiya City: a total-quality-management-based assessment of disadvantaged populations. Nat Hazards 29(3):565–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tamura K, Tatsuki S, Hayashi H (2000) The external validity of life recovery tasks and their structure among the disaster victims of the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. J Soc Saf Sci 2:25–32 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  38. Tatsuki S, Hayashi H (2000) Total-quality-management-based assessment of Kobe City’s life recovery assistance programs for victims of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. In: Paper presented at 8th international symposium on natural and technological hazards, 24 May 2000, Tokushima, JapanGoogle Scholar
  39. Tatsuki S, Hayashi H (2001) General Linear model analyses of life recovery factors in the 2001 Kobe panel survey data. In: Proceedings of U.S.-Japan cooperative research in urban earthquake disaster mitigation third grantees’ meeting, pp 557–574Google Scholar
  40. The Ministry of Civil Affairs (2011) Natural disaster relief regulation interpretation. China Social Sciences Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  41. Tsuganezawa T, Tatsuki T, Saitoh C, Minemoto K (2000) Post disaster studies of individual preparedness and life recovery: two perspectives. Report to Ministry of Education, Japan.
  42. Uitto JI (1998) The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities—a theoretical framework. Appl Geogr 18(1):7–16. doi: 10.1016/S0143-6228(97)00041-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vogel JM, Vernberg EM (1993) Part 1: childrens psychological responses to disasters. J Clin Child Psychol 22(4):464–484. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2204_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang Y, Dai J, Miao C (2010) Influence of price fluctuation after Wenchuan earthquake on unit cost of building rehabilitation. J Nat Disasters 19(4):95–101 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  45. Wang Y, Chen H, Li J (2012) Factors affecting earthquake recovery: the Yao’an earthquake of China. Nat Hazards 64(1):37–53. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0224-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang Y, Li J, Chen H, Zou Z (2014) The time process of post-earthquake domestic life recovery: the Yao’an earthquake in china. Disasters 38(4):774–789. doi: 10.1111/disa.12083
  47. Willroth P, Diez JR, Arunotai N (2011) Modelling the economic vulnerability of households in the Phang-Nga Province (Thailand) to natural disasters. Nat Hazards 58(2):753–769. doi: 10.1007/s11069-010-9635-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu JY, Lindell MK (2004) Housing reconstruction after two major earthquakes: the 1994 Northridge earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan. Disasters 28(1):63–81. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00243.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang Y, Peacock WG (2010) Planning for housing recovery? Lessons learned from Hurricane Andrew. J Am Plan As 76(1):5–24. doi: 10.1080/01944360903294556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of MOEBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency ManagementBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations