Natural Hazards

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 1047–1056 | Cite as

Animals as valuable instinctive and ‘learned’ beings in the field of disaster management: a comparative perspective

  • Kyoo-Man Ha
Original Paper


This article justified the role of animals in the field of disaster management by testing the hypothesis that if animal behavior is meaningful, then it deserves a systematic study. An increasing number of researches have investigated, in a limited way, how animals react to the occurrence of disaster. The present study examined the issue in terms of its importance and applicability in the international community. Comparative qualitative analysis was used as the major methodology. Two comparative characteristics, namely the similarities and the differences between animals and humans, were cross-checked on three analytical levels: (1) basic instinct, (2) disaster response, and (3) learning ability. Because animal behavior was found meaningful compared with human behavior, the hypothesis was accepted. In this regard, humans should further analyze animal behavior and then include the significance of observing their behavioral patterns into diverse emergency operation plans.


Similarities and differences Basic instinct Disaster response Learning ability Multidisciplinary study 


  1. Aldrich Daniel P (2008) The need for comparative research in disaster studies: the role of social, not physical, infrastructure in recovery. Conference paper prepared for Jamsetji Tata Centre for disaster management conference on disasters, p 1–29Google Scholar
  2. ASIS International (2003) ASIS Disaster Preparation Guide. Alexandria, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey Regina (2014) Can Animals Sense Natural Disaster?. About.Com Biology Available at Accessed 20 June 2014
  4. Berger-Tal Oded, Polak Tal, Oron Aya, Lubin Yael, Kotler Burt P, and Saltz David (2011) Integrating animal behavior and conservation biology: a conceptual framework. Behav Ecol 22(2):236–239Google Scholar
  5. Biello David (2012) It’s not just fukushima: mass disaster evacuations challenge planners. Nat News March(5)Google Scholar
  6. Brewer WH (1873) The sense of smell in animals, nature. Nature 7:360–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casini Lorenzo (2007) Models of public administration: comparative analysis of administrative organisation. Available at Accessed on 3 Feb 2013
  8. Coleing Amelia (2009) The application of social network theory to animal behaviour. Biosci Horiz 2(1):32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins Richard F (2007) Companion animals in disaster response planning, part 2: the NEHA second dog and first cat speak out. J Environ Health Vol 69 No 6: p 4 and 23Google Scholar
  10. COMET (Cooperative Program for Operational Meteorology, Education, and Training). (2012) Anticipating hazardous weather and community risk. Available at Accessed on 15 March 2014
  11. Correa Julio E (2011) The dog’s sense of smell. Alabama cooperative extension system, unp-0066: p 1–3Google Scholar
  12. Decker ShannaM, Lord LindaK, Walker WilliamL, Wittum ThomasE (2010) Emergency and disaster planning at ohio animal shelters. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 13:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donovan J, Adams CJ (1996) Beyond animal rights: a feminist caring ethic for the treatment of animals. Continuum, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2010) Animals in disaster: awareness and preparedness. Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  15. Fraser David (2009) Animal behaviour, animal welfare and the scientific study of affect. Appl Anim Behav Sci 118:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Government of India (2010) National disaster management guidelines: management of drought. New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendrickson Dylan, Armon Jeremy, Mearns Robin (1998) The changing nature of conflict and famine vulnerability: the case of livestock raiding in Turkana District, Kenya. Disasters 22(3):185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holmes DJ, Kristan DM (2008) Comparative and alternative approaches and novel animal models for aging research. Age 30:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knight Rex (1932) The explanation of animal behaviour. Nature 130:649–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laxton SarahC, Smith DanJ (2009) Dendrochronological reconstruction of snow avalanche activity in the Lahul Himalaya, Northern India. Nat Hazards 49:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Life Positive Publications (2006) Could your pet save your life?. Available at Accessed on 11 Feb 2013
  22. Logan JohnM (1977) Animal behaviour and earthquake prediction. Nature 265:404–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McFarland DJ (1977) Decision making in animals. Nature 269:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mercer Jessica, Kelman Ilan (2010) Living alongside a volcano in Baliau, Papua New Guinea. Disaster Prev Manag 19(4):412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miklosi Adam, Soproni Krisztina (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cognit 9:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nikonov AA (1992) Abnormal animal behavior as a precursor of the 7 December 1988 Spitak, Armenia, Earthquake. Nat Hazards 6:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Savoiu Gheorghe (2011) The holistic concepts of disaster management and social cohesion—statistics and method. Sci Bull—Econ Sci Vol 10 No 1: p 1–19Google Scholar
  28. Schneider MariaCristina, Aguilera XimenaP, Smith RyanM, Moynihan MatthewJ, Silva Jr, da Barbosa Jarbas, Aldighieri Sylvain, Almiron Maria (2011) Importance of animal/human health interface in potential public health emergencies of international concern in the Americas. Rev Panam Salud Publica 29(5):371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schnytzer Adi, Schnytzer Yisrael (2011) Animal modeling of earthquakes and prediction markets. Working Papers 2011–20: Department of Economics, Bar-Ilan University, Available at Accessed on 10 March 2014
  30. Schollmeyer Josh (2005) Emergency response: hive mentality. Bull At Sci September/October. p 11Google Scholar
  31. Scott Graham (2005) Essential Animal Behavior. Blackwell, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  32. Bhargava Neeti, Katiyar VK, Sharma, ML, and Pradhan P (2009) Earthquake prediction through animal behavior: a review. Indian J Biomech: Special Issue, Vol NCBM 7–8(March), p 159–165Google Scholar
  33. Sheldrake Rupert (2005) Listen to the animals: why did so many animals escape December’s tsunami?. The Ecologist, March, p 1–2Google Scholar
  34. Snay Lisa (2005) Can animals predict disaster?: a review. Available at Accessed on 22 Jan 2013
  35. Szczucinski Witold (2012) The post-depositional changes of the onshore 2004 tsunami deposits on the Andaman sea coast of Thailand. Nat Hazards Vol 60 p 115–133Google Scholar
  36. Tiwari Richa, Tiwari Sudhanshu (2011) Animals: a natural messenger for disasters. J Nat Prod 4:3–4Google Scholar
  37. Tong William K (1988) Abnormal animal behavior and the prediction of earthquakes Master degree thesis, Earth Science, Northeastern Illinois UniversityGoogle Scholar
  38. Tributsch Helmut (1984) When the snakes awake: animals and earthquake prediction MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  39. USGS (2014) The official website of U.S. geological survey Available at Accessed on 13 March 2014
  40. White Steven (2012) Companion animals, natural disasters and the law; an Australian perspective. Animals 2:380–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whiting Terry (2010) Book Review: considering Animals in Emergency Response. Soc Anim 18:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson Grant, Wilson Thomas, Cole Jim, Oze Christopher (2012) Vulnerability of laptop computers to volcanic ash and gas. Nat Hazards 63:711–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zelch PattiR (2010) What animals do before a hurricane. Sylvan Dell Publishing, South CarolinaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Emergency ManagementInje UniversityGimhaeKorea

Personalised recommendations