Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 887–908 | Cite as

Impacts of urbanization on flooding of a coastal urban catchment: a case study of Mumbai City, India

  • P. E. Zope
  • T. I. Eldho
  • V. Jothiprakash
Original Paper

Abstract

Land use–land cover (LULC) change in space and time is the main cause behind the changing hydrological processes, ecosystem and environment in urban catchments. In the present study, the main focus was on evaluation of spatial and temporal variation of land use and land cover change in a major coastal urban catchment of Mumbai City, India, called Mithi River catchment. The LULC is derived from the topographic map surveyed in the year 1966 and satellite image for the year 2009. The analysis from toposheet and remote sensing data showed that there is a rise in the built-up area of Mithi River catchment, Mumbai by 59.66 % between 1966 and 2009. It also showed adverse human-induced influences on the Mithi River course and its catchment. Flood hydrographs for different land use conditions were derived by using Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number hydrological model and kinematic wave model, for routing available within the HEC-HMS software. Flood plain maps as well as flood hazard maps for the different land use scenarios have been developed by integrating the models HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS with HEC-GeoHMS and HEC-GeoRAS as well as with GIS and remote sensing. Results obtained from the present study revealed marginal increases in the runoff peak discharges and volumes within the catchment. Even though the runoff change is marginal, combined with tidal influence, it may cause major flooding problem. The integrated modeling approach has been found to be very effective for flood estimation, flood plain and flood hazard mapping. The flood plain and flood hazard maps derived can be used as effective tool to minimize the damages within the flood-prone areas of the river basin for the Mumbai City.

Keywords

Urbanization Coastal urban catchment Land use–land cover change Flood plain modeling Flood hazard map 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the India Metrological Department and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai for providing all the necessary data for this study.

References

  1. Ali M, Khan SJ, Aslam I, Khan Z (2011) Simulation of the impacts of land use change on surface runoff of Lai Nullah basin in Islamabad, Pakistan. Landsc Urban Plan 102:271–279. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen Y, Xu Y, Yin Y (2009) Impacts of land use change scenarios on storm-runoff generation in Xitiaoxi basin, China. Quatern Int 208:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2008.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chow V, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied Hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. CWPRS (2006) 1-D mathematical model and desk studies for mitigating floods of Mithi River in Mumbai Technical Report No. 4297 (unpublished)Google Scholar
  5. Defries R, Eshleman KN (2004) Impact of California’s climatic regimes and coastal land use change on streamflow characteristics. J Am Water Resour As 39:1419–1433Google Scholar
  6. Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y (2009) Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Appl Geogr 29:390–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dewan AM, Kumamoto T, Nishigaki M (2006) Flood hazard delineation in greater Dhaka, Bangladesh using an integrated GIS and remote sensing approach. Geocarto Int 21(2):33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eldho TI, Jha A, Singh AK (2006) Integrated watershed modeling using a finite element method and GIS approach. Int J River Basin Manag 4(1):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FFC (Fact Finding Committee) (2006) Maharashtra State Govt. Committee Report. 31–130 (unpublished)Google Scholar
  10. Gul GO, Harmancroglu N, Gul A (2010) A combined hydrologic and hydraulic modeling approach for testing efficiency of structural flood control measures. Nat Hazards 54:245–260. doi: 10.1007/s11069-009-9464-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Joseph G (2005) Fundamentals of remote sensing. University Press, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan SI, Yang H, Jiahu W, Yilmaz KK, Gourley J, Adler RF, Brakenridge RG, Policelli F, Irwin D (2011) Satellite remote sensing and hydrologic modeling for flood inundation mapping in lake Victoria Basin: implications for hydrologic prediction in ungauged basins. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 49(1):85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lambin EF (1997) Modeling and monitoring land cover change processes in tropical regions. Prog Phys Geogr 21(3):375–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lastra J, Fernandez E, Diez-herrero A, Marquinez J (2008) Flood hazard delineation combining geomorphological and hydrological methods: an example in the Northern Iberian Peninsula. Nat Hazards 45:277–293. doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9164-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee G, Jun KS, Chung ES (2013) Integrated multi-criteria flood vulnerability approach using fuzzy TOPSIS and Delpi technique. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:1293–1312. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-1293-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lopez E, Bocco G, Mendoza M, Duhau E (2001) Predicting land cover and land use change in the urban fringe a case in Morelia City, Mexico. Landsc Urban Plan 55(4):271–285. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00160-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorup JK, Refsgaard JC, Mazvimavi D (1998) Assessing the effect of land use change on catchment runoff by combined use of statistical tests and hydrological modelling: case studies from Zimbabwe. J Hydrol 205:147–163. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1176(97)00311-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Melesse AM, Shih SF (2002) Spatialy distributed storm runoff depth estimation using Landsat images and GIS. Comput Electron Agric 37:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer S, Olivera F (2007) Flood plain mapping and hydraulic analysis with HEC-GeoRAS 4.1.1 and ArcGIS 9, Report by Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Olivera F, Madiment DR (2000) GIS tools for HMS modeling support. In: Maidment DR, Diokie D (eds) Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with geographic information systems. Environmental Systems Research Institute Press, USA, pp 85–112Google Scholar
  21. Potter KW (1991) Hydrological impact of changing land management practices in a moderate-sized agricultural catchment. Water Resour Res 27:845–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pramojanee P, Tanavud C, Yongchalermchai C, Navanugraha C (1997) An application of GIS for mapping of flood hazard and risk area in Nakron Sri Thammarat Province, south of Thailand. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Geo Information for sustainable land management, En schede. The Netherlands, pp 198–207Google Scholar
  23. Riebsame WE, Meyer WE, Turner BL (1994) Modeling land use and cover as part of global environmental change. Clim Change 28:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saghafian B, Farazjoo H, Bozorgy B, Yazdandoost F (2008) Flood intensification due to changes in land use. Water Resour Manage 22:1051–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Samant HP, Subramanyan V (1998) Landuse/land cover change in Mumbai-Navi Mumbai cities and its effects on the drainage Basins and channels—a study using GIS. Photonivachak 26(1–2):1–6Google Scholar
  26. Story M, Congalton RG (1986) Accuracy assessment: a user’s perspective. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 52(3):397–399Google Scholar
  27. Suriya S, Mudgal BV (2012) Impact of urbanization on flooding: the Thirusoolam sub watershed—a case study. J Hydrol 412:210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tingsanchali T, Karim MF (2005) Flood hazard and risk analysis in the southwest region of Bangladesh. Hydrol Processes 19:2055–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. USACE (2010) HEC-RAS River analysis system, Hydraulic reference manual, Version 4.1, USACE, Davis, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. USACE (2011) GIS tools for support of HEC-RAS using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS: Users manual, Version 4.3.93, USACE, Davis, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  31. Vieux BE (2001) Distributed hydrologic modeling using GIS. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vorosmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers R (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5477.284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang GX, Liu JQ, Kubota JP, Chen L (2007) Effects of land-use changes on hydrological processes in the middle basin of the Heihe River, northwest China. Hydrol Processes 21:1370–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WAPCOS (Water And Power Consultancy (INDIA) Ltd.) (2007) Report for Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), Mumbai, India (unpublished)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations