Experiments on internal erosion in sandy gravel foundations containing a suspended cutoff wall under complex stress states
Internal erosion is one of the most common failure modes of embankment dams or foundations, and the simplest and most effective preventive measure is to build a cutoff wall. The soil at the bottom of the cutoff wall is usually under complex stress states. The deeper the cutoff wall, the higher is the stress. In this study, the effects of stress conditions on the evolution of internal erosion were investigated in sandy gravel foundations containing a suspended cutoff wall using a newly developed stress-controlled erosion apparatus. Three series of erosion tests were conducted on gap-graded soil under different confining stresses, different deviatoric stresses, and different confining and deviatoric stresses. The results of these tests are as follows: (1) The discharge and permeability decrease with an increase in the confining stress, but the critical hydraulic gradient increases. (2) In the second series of erosion tests, the specimen is compressed under low deviatoric stress; the specimen undergoes shear expansion under high deviatoric stress. (3) In the third series of erosion tests, the confining and deviatoric stresses synchronously change, and therefore, their combined effect on the evolution of internal erosion is complicated. Under low stress, the soil is compressed in the early stage of the experiment, and its structure may change during internal erosion. When the stress level is high, the specimen also undergoes shear expansion, and the degree of expansion is controlled by both confining and deviatoric stresses.
KeywordsInternal erosion Stress state Suspended cutoff wall Shear expansion Soil structure
The authors are grateful for the assistance of the laboratory where all analyses were performed. The support of the 973 Program of China (2012CB417005) and the postgraduate research and innovation plan project of Jiangsu Province (CXZZ13_0243) are gratefully acknowledged.
- Fell R, Fry JJ (2007) The state of the art of assessing the likelihood of internal erosion of embankment dams, water retaining structures and their foundations. v. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 1–23Google Scholar
- Kulhaway FH, Duncan JM (1972) Stresses and movements in Oroville Dam. J Soil Mech Found Div 98(7):653–665Google Scholar
- Rice JD, Duncan JM (2008) A study on the long-term performance of seepage barriers in dams. Virginia Tech Center for Geotechnical Practice and Research publication no. 49Google Scholar
- Richards KS, Reddy KR (2010) True triaxial piping test apparatus for evaluation of piping potential in earth structures. Geotech Test J 33(1):83–95Google Scholar
- Stephens I (2009) The behavior of flow through cracks in concrete seepage barriers. Utah State University, LoganGoogle Scholar
- Van Leuven RG, Rice JD (2011) Assessing the potential for seepage barrier defects to propagate into seepage erosion mechanisms. In: 31st annual USSD conference: 21st century dam design—advances and adaptations, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
- Whitmer J (2009) Interaction of soil and seepage barrier cracks under seepage flow. Utah State University, LoganGoogle Scholar
- Wudtke RB (2008) Failure mechanisms of hydraulic heave at excavation. In: 19th European young geotechnical engineers’ conference, Gyor, HungaryGoogle Scholar
- Zhang LM, Xu Y, Jia JS (2009) Analysis of earth dam failures: a database approach. Georisk 3(3):184–189Google Scholar