Natural Hazards

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 1453–1473 | Cite as

Field measurements in river embankments: validation and management with spatial database and webGIS

  • Lucia Simeoni
  • Paolo Zatelli
  • Claudio Floretta
Original Paper


This study focuses on the development of a system with a spatial database and a webGIS able to store, validate and display the data to assist the decision makers in managing early warning systems for river embankment failure. In order to obtain precise results, it is essential to have a tool with ability of managing a large number of data for checking their reliability and for locating them in the space. In this paper, special emphasis was given in the development of procedures to assess the reliability of the measures. For this purpose, the database includes all the information needed to describe the instrument performance, such as the sand pack size and casing diameter of open-standpipe piezometers for evaluating their time lag, and the calibration curves of transducers with the possibility of their updating. The position of the non-functioning instruments is identified through the analysis of the electrical signal and spatial displays, while the analyses of the redundancy and coherence of measures is used for detecting doubtful data. Database and webGIS were applied to the monitoring data of an embankment of the Adige River in Northern Italy. The database and webGIS system has proved to be a suitable and effective tool for the management and validation of real-time data and periodical field measurements.


River embankment Failure Field measurements Spatial database webGIS Data validation 



The work has been partially supported by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano-Bozen, Italy, that funded for the field instrumentation. The authors are grateful to Mr Davide Ronco for his contribution to prepare the images from the webGIS.


  1. Cho SE (2012) Probabilistic analysis of seepage that considers the spatial variability of permeability for an embankment on soil foundation. Eng Geol 133–134:30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christian JT, Ladd CC, Baecher GB (1994) Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2180–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crossland MD, Wynne BE, Perkins WC (1995) Spatial decision support systems: an overview of technology and a test of efficacy. Decis Support Syst 14(3):219–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DiBiagio E, Kjekstad O (2007) Early warning, instrumentation and monitoring landslides. In: Proceedings of the 2nd regional training course, RECLAIM II, 29th January–3rd February 2007Google Scholar
  5. Dunnicliff J (1993) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance, new ed. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Elkateb T, Chalaturnyk R, Robertson PK (2003) An overview of soil heterogeneity: quantification and implications on geotechnical field problems. Can Geotech J 40(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ext JS Cross-Browser Rich Internet Application Framework (2010) Accessed 12 Dec 2010
  8. Fan-Chieh Y, Chien-Yuan C, Sheng-Chi L, Yu-Ching L, Shang-Yu W, Kei-Wai C (2007) A web-based decision support system for slopeland hazard warning. Environ Monit Assess 127(1–3):419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallage C, Uchimora T (2010) Investigation on parameters used in warning systems for rain-induced embankment instability. In: Proceedings of the 63rd Canadian geotechnical conference (GEO2010), GEO2010 Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, pp 1025–1031 Google Scholar
  10. GeoServer website (2010) Accessed 12 Dec 2010
  11. Gui S, Zhang R, Turner JP, Xue X (2000) Probabilistic slope stability analysis with stochastic soil hydraulic conductivity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopman V, Kruiver P, Koelewijn A, Peters T (2011) How to create a smart levee. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on field measurements in GeoMechanics 2011, Berlin, Germany, September 12–16Google Scholar
  13. Huang P, Yao J-G, Lu L, Jin A, Wei L (2005) Design of WebGIS based power quality monitoring system and its application. Power System Technol 29(7):52–55Google Scholar
  14. Hvorslev MJ (1951) Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observation. Bulletin No. 36, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, Vicksburg, Mississippi, pp 50Google Scholar
  15. MapFish website (2010) Accessed 12 Dec 2010
  16. Marr WA (2013) Instrumentation and monitoring of slope stability. In: Proceedings of the Geo-Congress 2013, ASCE, stability and performance of slopes and embankments III, San Diego (CA, USA), 3–6 March 2013, pp 2224–2245Google Scholar
  17. Marsland A, Randolph MF (1978) A study of the variation and effects of water pressures in the pervious strata underlying Crayford Marshes. Geotechnique 28(4):435–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meijer RJ, Koelewijn AR (2008) The development of an early warning system for dike failure. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference and exhibition on waterside security 2008, August 26–28, 2008, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  19. Merz B (2006) Abschätzung von Hochwasserrisiken. Methoden, Grenzen und Mglichkeiten, Habilitationsschrift, E. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nägele und Obermiller), Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  20. Morris MW, Allsop W, Buijs FA, Kortenhaus A, Doorn N, Lesniewska D (2009) Failure modes and mechanisms for flood defence structures. In: Samuels P, Huntington S, Allsop W, Harrop J (eds) Flood risk management: research and practice. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 693–701Google Scholar
  21. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) (2000) Ralph B. Peck: Engineer, educator, a man of judgment. In: DiBiagio E, Flaate K (eds) Publication 207, NGI, Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  22. Oka F, Kimoto S, Kato R, Sunami S, Kodaka T (2008) A soil-water coupled analysis of the deformation of an unsaturated river embankment due to seepage flow and overflow. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference of IACMAG 2008, 1–6 October 2008, Goa, India, pp 2029–2041Google Scholar
  23. Open GIS Consortium Inc. website (2010) Accessed 18 May 2010
  24. OpenLayers: Free Maps for the Web (2010) Accessed 12 Dec 2010
  25. Penman ADM (1961) A study of the response time of various types of piezometer. In: Proceedings of the conference on pore pressure and suction in soils 1961, London, Butterworths, pp 53–58Google Scholar
  26. PostGIS website (2010) Accessed 12 Dec 2010
  27. PostgreSQL website (2010) Accessed 12 Dec 2010
  28. Pozzato A (2009) Stability of river embankment of coarse-grained well graded soil: the case study of the Adige river at Egna (BZ), Ph.D. Thesis, University of TrentoGoogle Scholar
  29. Simeoni L (2007) Laboratory and in situ tests on an automatic monitoring system with IPIs. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on field measurements in geomechanics 2007, Boston, USA, 24–27 September 2007, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 175Google Scholar
  30. Simeoni L, Tarantino A, Pozzato A, De Polo F, Bragagna M (2008) The design of a monitoring system for an embankment of the Adige River. Italian Geotech J 42(3):73–94 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  31. Staiano T, Rinaldi M, Paris E (2001) Seepage and stability analysis of embankments during flood events. In: Proceedings of the XXIX IAHR congress, 21st century: new era for hydraulic research and its application 2001, Beijing, 16–21 September 2001Google Scholar
  32. The Apache Software Foundation (2010) Accessed 12 Dec 2010
  33. Van Beek VM, de Bruijn HTJ, Knoeff JG, Bezuijen A, Förster U (2010) Levee failure due to piping: a full scale experiment. In: Burns SE, Bhatia SK, Avila CMC, Hunt BE (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on scour and erosion ICSE5 2010. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication no. 210, pp 283–292Google Scholar
  34. Van Der Most H, Wehrung M (2005) Dealing with uncertainties in flood risk assessment of dike rings in the Netherlands. Nat Hazards 36:191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vaughan PR (1969) A note on sealing piezometers in boreholes. Géotechnique 19(3):405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vorogushyn S, Merz B, Apel H (2009) Development of dike fragility curves for piping and micro-instability breach mechanisms. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1383–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vrijling JK (2001) Probabilistic design of water defence systems in The Netherlands. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Werth K (2003) Geschichte der Etsch. Tappeiner Verlag, Lana (BZ)Google Scholar
  39. Yoo C, Kim J-M (2007) Tunneling performance prediction using an integrated GIS and neural network. Comput Geotech 34:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucia Simeoni
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paolo Zatelli
    • 1
  • Claudio Floretta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations