Natural Hazards

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 973–986 | Cite as

Tsunami risk perception and preparedness on the east coast of New Zealand during the 2009 Samoan Tsunami warning

Original Paper


Several coastal communities on the North Island of New Zealand were evacuated during the 2009 Samoan Tsunami warning. This study aimed to explore the risk perception and preparedness levels of a small cohort of people living in an at-risk area. Qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews from fifteen residents evacuated from the town of Pauanui on the Coromandel Peninsula. Thematic content analysis showed common themes and gaps where emergency management systems were deficient. This study found that participants had inaccurate risk perception, a high reliance on warning systems, low levels of preparedness and lacked knowledge about natural warning signs of tsunamis. The themes identified are useful indicators of where current systems are failing people but need to be expanded to generalise results. The event, on which this study is based, provided a unique opportunity to explore people’s reactions to a predicted tsunami. The study confirmed the findings of prior studies that people in at-risk places are not necessarily well informed or prepared. The paper contributes further knowledge to inform the advance of public education and community engagement with respect to tsunami preparedness.


Tsunami Risk perception Public education Preparedness Evacuation New Zealand 


  1. Basher R (2006) Global early warning systems for natural hazards: systematic and people-centred. Philos Trans R Soc 364(1845):2167–2182. doi: 10.1098/rsta 2006.1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becken S, Hughey K (2013) Linking tourism into emergency management structures to enhance disaster risk reduction. Tourism Manag 36:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird D, Dominey-Howes D (2006) Tsunami risk mitigation and the issue of public awareness. Aust J Emerg Manag 21(4):29–35Google Scholar
  4. Bird D, Chague-Goff C, Gero A (2011) Human responses to extreme events: a review of three post-tsunami disaster case studies. Aust Geogr 42(3):225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird D, Ling M, Haynes K (2012) Flooding facebook: the use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. Aust J Emerg Manag 27(1):27–39Google Scholar
  6. Blake SJ, Galea ER, Westeng H, Dixon AJP (2004) An analysis of human behaviour during the WTC disaster of 11 September 2001 based on published survivor accounts. International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire, Belfast, UK, InGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunce SHK (2012) Exploring information experience using social media during the 2011 Queensland Floods: a pilot study. Aust Library J 61(1):34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dabner N (2012) ‘Breaking Ground’ in the use of social media: a case study of a university earthquake response to inform educational design with Facebook. Internet High Edu 15(1):69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darienzo M, Aya A, Crawford G, Gibbs D, Whitmore P, Wilde T, Yanagi B (2005) Local tsunami warning in the pacific coastal United States. Nat Hazards 35(1):111–119. doi: 10.1007/s11069-004-2407-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Day B (2012) Whitianga tsunami siren a false alarm. Thames Coromandel District Council, ThamesGoogle Scholar
  12. de Lange W, Fraser R (1999) Overview of tsunami hazard in New Zealand. Tephra: 3–9Google Scholar
  13. de Lange W, McSaveney E (2009) Tsunamis-twentieth-century-tsunamis. Accessed 19 Jan 2010
  14. Dominey-Howes D, Goff J (2012) Tsunami risk management in pacific island countries and territories (PICTs): Some issues, challenges and ways forward. Pure and Applied Geophysics 170(9–10):1397–1413Google Scholar
  15. Downes GL, Stirling MW (2001) Groundwork for development of a probabilistic tsunami hazard model for New Zealand. In: Tsunami International (ed) Symposium. USA, Seattle, pp 293–301Google Scholar
  16. Dudley WC, Whitney R, Faasisila J, Fonolua S, Jowitt A, Chan-Kau M (2011) Learning from the victims: new physical and social science information about tsunamis from victims of the September 29, 2009 event in Samoa and American Samoa. Earth Sci Rev 107(1–2):201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dufty N (2012) Using social media to build community disaster resilience. Aust J Emerg Manag 27(1):40–45Google Scholar
  18. Finnis K (2004) Creating a Resilient New Zealand. University of Otago, OtagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser S, Leonard GS, Matsuo I, Murakami H (2012) 2012 Tsunami evacuation: lessons from the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami of March 11th 2011. Lower Hutt: GNS Science. GNS Science report 2012/17. p 81Google Scholar
  20. Goff J, Terry J (2012) Living with natural hazards in the Asia–Pacific region. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 361(1):1–2. doi: 10.1144/sp361.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goff J, Nichol S, Chagué-Goff C, Horrocks M, McFadgen B, Cisternas M (2010) Predecessor to New Zealand’s largest historic trans-South Pacific tsunami of 1868 AD. Mar Geol 275:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gregg CE, Houghton BF, Paton D, Lachman R, Lachman J, Johnston DM, Wongbusarakum S (2006) Natural Warning Signs of Tsunamis: Human Sensory Experience and Response to the 2004 Great Sumatra Earthquake and Tsunami in Thailand. Earthquake Spectra 22 (S3):671-691. doi: 10.1193/1.2206791
  23. Gregg C, Houghton B, Paton D, Johnston D, Swanson D, Yanagi B (2007) Tsunami warnings: understanding in Hawai‘i. Nat Hazards 40(1):71–87. doi: 10.1007/s11069-006-0005-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gurtner Y (2007) Phuket: tsunami and tourism - a preliminary investigation. CAB eBooks, Crisis management in tourismGoogle Scholar
  25. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences (2005) Review of Tsunami Hazard and Risk in New Zealand. Lower Hutt, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnston D, Paton D, Crawford GL, Ronan K, Houghton B, Burgelt P (2005) Measuring tsunami preparedness in coastal Washington, United States. Nat Hazards 35:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston D, Pettersson R, Downes G, Paton D, Leonard G, Pishief K, Bell R (2008) Developing an effective tsunami warning system: lessons from the 1960 Chile earthquake tsunami for New Zealand coastal communities. Kotuitui: New Zealand J Soc Sci 3:105–120Google Scholar
  28. King D, Gurtner Y (2005) After the wave: a wake up warning for Australian coastal locations. Aust J Emerg Manag 20(1):4–9Google Scholar
  29. Leonard GS, Johnston DM, Paton D, Christianson A, Becker J, Keys H (2008) Developing effective warning systems: ongoing research at Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 172(3–4):199–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McClure J, Wills C, Johnston D, Recker C (2011) How the 2010 Canterbury (Darfield) earthquake affected earthquake risk perception: comparing citizens inside and outside the earthquake region. Australas J Disaster Trauma Stud 2011–2:3–10Google Scholar
  31. Media and Public Affairs Branch Queensland Police Service (2011) Disaster management and social media: a case study. Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  32. Mileti D, Sorensen JH (1990) Communication of emergency public warnings: A social science perspective and state-of-the-art assessment. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management (2007) National Hazardscape report. Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management (2009) Campaign monitoring research 2009. Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management (2010) Tsunami advisory and warning supporting plan [SP 01/09]. Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  36. Morris B (2011) Managing tsunami risks in Whitianga. 4 edn. Environment WaikatoGoogle Scholar
  37. Morrissey SA, Reser JP (2003) Evaluating the effectiveness of psychological preparedness advice in community cyclone preparedness materials. Aust J Emerg Manag 18(2):46–61Google Scholar
  38. Orchiston C (2012) Seismic risk scenario planning and sustainable tourism management: Christchurch and the Alpine Fault zone, South Island, New Zealand. J Sustain Tourism 20(1):59–79. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2011.617827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paton D, Smith L, Johnston D (2005) When good intentions turn bad: promoting natural hazard preparedness. Aust J Emerg Manag 20(1):25–30Google Scholar
  40. Paton D, Houghton B, Gregg C, Gill D, Ritchie L, McIvor D, Larin P, Meinhold S, Horan J, Johnston D (2008) Managing tsunami risk in coastal communities: identifying predictors of preparedness. Aust J Emerg Manag 23(1):4–9Google Scholar
  41. Pauanuionline (2007) Pauanui Beach. Accessed 23 Sept 2011
  42. Peary B, Shaw R, Takeuchi Y (2012) Utilization of social media in the east Japan earthquake and tsunami and its effectiveness. J Nat Disaster Sci 34(1):3–18Google Scholar
  43. Power W, Gale N (2011) Tsunami forecasting and monitoring in New Zealand. Pure Appl Geophys 168(6–7):1125–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prasetya G, Healy T, de Lange W (2009) Hydrodynamic modelling of tsunami overwash of Whitianga township and harbour. University of Waikato, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  45. Preece D (2012) False tsunami alarm for Whitianga. Hauraki Herald, 11 May 2012, p 3Google Scholar
  46. Renn O (2004) Perception of risks. Toxicol Lett 149(1–3):405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ripley A (2008) The unthinkable: who survives when disaster strikes—and why. Random House Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stewart C, Leonard GS, Johnston DM, Hume TM (2005) The 2003 national coastal community survey: results for Waikato beach communities. Lower Hutt: Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences science report 2005/28. p 114Google Scholar
  50. Streeton R, Cooke M, Campbell J (2004) Researching the researchers: using a snowballing technique. Nurse Res 12(1):35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Synolakis CE, Bernard EN (2006) Tsunami science before and beyond Boxing Day 2004. Philos Trans R Soc 364(1845):2231–2265. doi: 10.1098/rsta 2006.1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thames Coromandel District Council (2011) Public Notices: Whangamata and Tairua-Pauanui Tsunami Warning System Test.
  53. Thames Valley Combined Civil Defence Emergency Management Organisation (2010) Pauanui community tsunami action plan. Thames, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  54. Walton D, Lamb S, Smith K (2009) Rational Chaos: Humand and traffic behaviour in Earthquake Events. Tephra, p 31–37Google Scholar
  55. Wilson SA, Temple BJ, Milliron ME, Vazquez C, Packard MD, Rudy BS (2008) The lack of disaster preparedness by the public and it’s affect on communities. Int J Rescue Disaster Med 7:2Google Scholar
  56. Yun NY, Hamada M (2011) A comparative study on human impacts caused by the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake and disaster mitigation. In: International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Tokyo, Japan, 2012Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Paramedicine and Emergency ManagementAUT UniversityAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations