Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 1553–1574 | Cite as

Flood hazard assessment with multiparameter approach derived from coupled 1D and 2D hydrodynamic flow model

  • Pankaj Mani
  • Chandranath Chatterjee
  • Rakesh Kumar
Original Paper

Abstract

Hydrodynamic flow modeling is carried out using a coupled 1D and 2D hydrodynamic flow model in northern India where an industrial plant is proposed. Two flooding scenarios, one considering the flooding source at regional/catchment level and another considering all flooding sources at local level have been simulated. For simulating flooding scenario due to flooding of the upstream catchment, the probable maximum flood (PMF) in the main river is routed and its flooding impact at the plant site is studied, while at the local level flooding, in addition to PMF in the main river, the probable maximum precipitation at the plant site and breaches in the canals near the plant site have been considered. The flood extent, depth, level, duration and maximum flow velocity have been computed. Three parameters namely the flood depth, cross product of flood depth and velocity and flood duration have been used for assessing the flood hazard, and a flood hazard classification scheme has been proposed. Flood hazard assessment for flooding due to upstream catchment and study on local scale facilitates determination of plinth level for the plant site and helps in identifying the flood protection measures.

Keywords

Canal breach Flood depth Flood velocity Flood duration Flood hazard Hazard classification scheme Coupled 1D and 2D hydrodynamic flow model 

References

  1. Abt SR, Wittler RJ, Talor A, Love DJ (1989) Human stability in a flood hazard zone. Water Resour Bull 25:881–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselmo V, Galeati G, Palmieri S, Rossi U, Todini E (1996) Flood risk assessment using an integrated hydrological and hydraulic modelling approach: a case study. J Hydrology 175(1):533–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronica GT, Candela A, Fabia P, Santoro M (2011) Estimation of flood inundation probabilities using global hazard indexes based on hydrodynamic variables. J Phys Chem Earth (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2011.04.001
  4. Bates PD, De Roo APJ (2000) A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. J Hydrology 236:54–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates PD, Lane SN, Ferguson RI (2005) Computational Fluid Dynamics: Applications in Environmental Hydraulics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. doi: 10.1002/0470015195 Google Scholar
  6. Bhan SK, Flood Team (2001) Study of floods in West Bengal during September 2000 using Indian Remote Sensing Satellite data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 29(l2):1–3Google Scholar
  7. Cancado V, Brasil L, Nascimento N, Guerra A (2008) Flood risk assessment in an urban area: Measuring hazard and Vulnerability, 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage. Edinburgh, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatterjee C, Förster S, Bronstert A (2008) Comparison of hydrodynamic models of different complexities to model floods with emergency storage areas. Hydrol Process 22(24):4695–4709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen J, Hill AA, Urbano LD (2009) A GIS-based model for urban flood inundation. J Hydrology 373:184–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunge JA, Holly FM, Verwy A (1980) Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics. Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. CWC (1984) Flood estimation report for upper Indo-Ganga plains (Subzone 1-e). Central Water Commission, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewan AM, Islam MM, Kumamoto T, Nishigaki M (2007) Evaluating flood hazard for land-use planning in Greater Dhaka of Bangladesh using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Water Resour Manage 21:1601–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DHI (1997) MIKE11 GIS Reference and User Manual. Horsholm, Denmark, Danish Hydraulic InstituteGoogle Scholar
  14. DHI (2000) MIKE 21 user guide. Danish Hydraulic Institute, HorsholmGoogle Scholar
  15. DHI (2004) MIKEFLOOD 1D-2D Modelling User Manual. Horsholm, Denmark, Danish Hydraulic InstituteGoogle Scholar
  16. Dhondia Z, Stelling G (2002) Application of one-dimensional two-dimensional integrated hydraulic model for flood simulation and damage assessment. Intl. Conf. on Hydroinformatics. Cardiff, UK, Proc. 5:265–276Google Scholar
  17. Dyhouse, Gary, Benn JA, David Ford Consulting, Hatchett J, Rhee H (2003) Floodplain modeling using HEC-RAS, 1st edn. Haestad Press WaterburyGoogle Scholar
  18. ENSURE (2009) Methodologies to assess vulnerability of structural systems, ENSURE-Del. 1.1.1, Project financed by the European Commission by the Seventh Framework Programme Area “Environment” Activity 6.1 “Climate Change, Pollution and Risks”Google Scholar
  19. Ervine DA, MacCleod (1999) Modelling a river channel with distant floodbanks. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers, water maritime and energy, vol 136, pp 21–33Google Scholar
  20. FEMA (2002) Guidelines and specifications for flood hazard mapping partners. Federal Emergency Management Agency publications. http://www.fema.gov/fhm/dl_cgs.shtm
  21. FIA-TB-3 (1993) Non residential flood proofing-requirements and certification for buildings located in special flood hazard areas. FEMA, Federal Insurance Administration, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Fread DL (1993) Flow routing. In: Maidment DR (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology, chapter 10. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghoneim E, Foody GM (2013) Assessing flash flood hazard in an arid mountainous region. Arab J Geosci 6(4):1191–1202Google Scholar
  24. Giardino M, Perotti L, Lanfranco M, Perrone G (2012) GIS and geomatics for disaster management and emergency relief: a proactive response to natural hazards. Applied Geomatics 4(1):33–46. doi: 10.1007/s12518-011-0071-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (1997) Regional frequency analysis-an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IS:11223 (2004) Guidelines for fixing spillway capacity. Bureau of Indian Standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  27. IS:2912 (2004) Lequid flow measurement in open channels-slope area method. Bureau of Indian Standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  28. Islam MM, Sado K (2000a) Flood hazard assessment in Bangladesh using NOAA-AVHRR data with geographical information system. Hydrol Process 14:605–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Islam MM, Sado K (2000b) Development of flood hazard maps of Bangladesh using NOAA-AVHRR images with GIS. Hydrological Sciences J 45:337–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonkman SN, Penning-Rowsell E (2008) Human instability in flood flows. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 44(4):1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00217.x Google Scholar
  31. Jonkman SN, Vrijling JK, Vrouwenvelder ACWM (2008) Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method. Nat Hazards 46:353–389Google Scholar
  32. Karvonen RA, Hepojoki A, Huhta HK, Louhio A (2000) The use of physical models in dam-break analysis. Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland, RESCDAM Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelman I, Spence R (2004) An overview of flood actions on buildings. Eng Geol 73:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kulkarni BD (2011) Generalized physical approach of estimating areal probable maximum precipitation (PMP) for plain region of the Godavari river basin (India). J Spat Hydrol 2:2Google Scholar
  35. Kumar R, Chatterjee C (2005) Regional flood frequency analysis using L-moments for North Brahmaputra Region of India. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers 10(1):1–7Google Scholar
  36. Kumar R, Chatterjee C, Kumar S, Lohani AK, Singh RD (2003) Development of regional flood frequency relationships using L-moments for Middle Ganga Plains Subzone 1(f) of India. International Journal of Water Resources Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands 17(4):243–257Google Scholar
  37. Li WeiFeng, Chen QW, Mao JQ (2009) Development of 1D and 2D coupled model to simulate urban inundation: an application to Beijing Olympic Village. Chin Sci Bull 54(9):1613–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Machado SM, Ahmad S (2007) Flood hazard assessment of Atrato River in Colombia. Water Resour Manag 21(3):591–609. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-9032-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Maijala T (2001) RESCDAM: development of rescue actions based on dam-break flood analysis. Final report, grant agreement no. Subv 99/52623 Community Action Programme in the field of civil protection. Finnish Environment Institute, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  40. Merwade V, Cook A, Coonrod J (2008) GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environ Model Softw 23(10–11):1300–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Merz B, Thieken AH, Gocht M (2007) Flood risk mapping at the local scale: concepts and challenges. In: Beguim S, Stive M, Hall JW (eds) Flood risk management in Europe. Springer, New york, pp 231–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mondal A (2009) Flood Risk Assessment on Meso scale, in a part of Birupa river basin using temporal RADARSAT data (2003, 2006 & 2008). Thesis submitted to Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS) and International Institute for Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation (ITC) in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Joint Master of Science degree in Geo-Hazards. http://iirs.gov.in/iirs/sites/default/files/StudentThesis/arunmodal.pdf
  43. NDMA (2008) National disaster management guidelines: Management of floods. National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  44. NIH (1997) Flood plain mapping in Phulbari (Assam/Meghalaya) area. CS(AR)-23/96-97. National Institute of Hydrology, RoorkeeGoogle Scholar
  45. NIH (2009) Flood hazard mapping and flood risk zoning for a River Reach (Ganga between Buxor to Hathidah (Rajendra Bridge near Mokama). National Institute of Hydrology, RoorkeeGoogle Scholar
  46. Rahman NM, Ochi S, Murai S, Hashimoto T, Kakiuchi H (1991) Flood risk mapping in Bangladesh-flood disaster management using remote sensing and GIS. In: Rahman NM (ed) Application of remote sensing in Asia and Oceania-environmental change monitoring. Asian Association of Remote Sensing, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  47. Rungo M, Olesen KW (2003) Combined 1- and 2-dimensional flood modelling. In: 4th Iranian Hydraulic conference, Oct 21–23, ShirazGoogle Scholar
  48. Samuels PG (1990) Cross section location in one-dimensional models. In: White WR (ed) International conference on river flood hydraulics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 339–350Google Scholar
  49. Sanyal J, Lu XX (2005) Remote sensing and GIS-based flood vulnerability assessment of human settlements: a case study of Gangetic West Bengal, India. Hydrol Process 19:3699–3716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sen DJ, Garg NK (1998) Efficient solution technique for dendritic channel networks. J. of Hydrologic Engineering 124:831–839Google Scholar
  51. Shrestha MS, Heggen R, Thapa KP, Ghimire ML, Shakya N (2004) Flood risk and vulnerability mapping using GIS: a Nepal case study. In: Proceedings of the second Asia Pacific Association of Hydrology and Water Resources (APHW) conference, vol 1, pp 180–190Google Scholar
  52. Stephenson D, Furumele M (2001) A hazard-risk index for urban flooding. XXIX IAHR Congress held at the Beijing International Convention Center (BICC) in Beijing, Sept 16–21Google Scholar
  53. Syme WJ, Pinnell MG, Wicks, JM (2004) Modeling flood inundation of urban areas in the UK using 2D/1D hydraulic models. In: Proceedings of 8th national conference on hydraulics in water engineering. The Institution of Engineers, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  54. Tingsanchali T, Karim MF (2005) Flood hazard and risk analysis in the southwest region of Bangladesh. Hydrol Process 19:2055–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. USACE (1998) Flood proofing performance: successes and failures. United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Flood Proofing Committee, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Werner MGF (2001) Impact of grid size in GIS based flood extent mapping using 1D flow model. Phys Chem Earth 26:517–522Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pankaj Mani
    • 1
  • Chandranath Chatterjee
    • 2
  • Rakesh Kumar
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Flood Management StudiesNational Institute of HydrologyPhulwarisharif, PatnaIndia
  2. 2.Agricultural and Food Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  3. 3.Surface Water Hydrology DivisionNational Institute of HydrologyRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations