Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 631–654 | Cite as

Initiatives for earthquake disaster risk management in the Kathmandu Valley

  • Amod Mani Dixit
  • Ryuichi Yatabe
  • Ranjan Kumar Dahal
  • Netra Prakash Bhandary
Original Paper

Abstract

Situated over the Himalayan tectonic zone, Kathmandu Valley as a lake in geological past has a long history of destructive earthquakes. In recent years, the earthquake risk of the valley has significantly increased due mainly to uncontrolled development, poor construction practices with no earthquake safety consideration, and lack of awareness among the general public and government authorities. Implementation of land use plan and building codes, strengthening of design and construction regulations, relocation of communities in risky areas, and conduction of public awareness programs are suitable means of earthquake disaster risk management practice. Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal, is still lacking earthquake disaster risk management plans. So, this paper highlights some initiatives adopted by both governmental and nongovernmental organizations of Nepal to manage earthquake disaster risk in the Kathmandu Valley. It provides some comprehensive information on recent initiatives of earthquake disaster risk management in the valley and also highlights the outcomes and challenges.

Keywords

Himalaya Kathmandu Valley Earthquake Risk management Hazard management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is an outcome of the last 20 years of work experience in the field of earthquake risk management in the Kathmandu Valley, and it is largely based on the work done by National Society for Earthquake Technology Nepal (NSET, Nepal). All research staffs of NSET are sincerely acknowledged for their technical support during the preparation of this paper. Also, the comments provided by three anonymous reviewers have greatly enhanced the quality of this paper.

References

  1. Ambraseys N, Bilham R (2000) A note on the Kangra Ms = 7.8 earthquake of 4 April 1905. Curr Sci 79:45–50Google Scholar
  2. Ambraseys N, Douglas J (2004) Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes. Geophys J Int 159(1):165–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armijo A, Tapponnier P, Mercier JL, Tonglin H (1986) Quaternary extension in southern Tibet. J Geophys Res 91(13):803–13872Google Scholar
  4. Armijo A, Tapponnier P, Tonglin H (1989) Late Cenozoic right-lateral strike-slip faulting in southern Tibet. J Geophys Res 94:2787–2838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ATC (1984) Comparison of seismic design practices in the United States and Japan, Applied Technology Council Report (ATC-15 report), p 317Google Scholar
  6. ATC (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, Applied Technology Council Report (ATC-13 report), p 492Google Scholar
  7. ATC (1992) A model methodology for assessment of seismic vulnerability and impact of disruption of water supply systems, Applied Technology Council Report (ATC-25-1 report), p 147Google Scholar
  8. Avouac JP, Tapponnier P (1993) Kinematic model of active deformation in Central Asia. Geophys Res Lett 20(10):895–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Avouac JP, Bollinger L, Lavé J, Cattin R, Flouzat M (2001) Le cycle sismique en Himalaya. C R Acad Sci 333:513–529Google Scholar
  10. BCDP (1994) Building Code Development Project: seismic hazard mapping and risk assessment for Nepal; UNDP/UNCHS (Habitat) Subproject: NEP/88/054/21.03. Min. Housing Phy. Planning, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  11. Bilham R (2001) Slow tilt reversal of the Lesser Himalaya between 1862 and 1992 at 78 deg. E, and bounds to the southeast rupture of the 1905 Kangra earthquake. Geophys J Int 144:713–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bilham R, Bodin P, Jackson M (1995) Entertaining a great earthquake in western Nepal: historic inactivity and geodetic tests for the present state of strain. J Nepal Geol Soc 11(1):73–78Google Scholar
  13. Bilham R, Larson KM, Freymueller J, PI Members (1997) GPS measurements of present day convergence across the Nepal Himalaya. Nature (London) 386(6620):61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chander R (1989) Southern limits of major earthquake ruptures along the Himalaya between 15 deg. E and 90 deg. E. Tectonophysics 170:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chatelain J-L, Tucker B, Guillier B, Kaneko F, Yepes H, Fernandez J, Valverde J, Hoefer G, Souris M, Dupérier E, Yamada T, Bustamante G, Villacis C (1999) Earthquake risk management pilot project in Quito, Ecuador. GeoJournal 49:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chitrakar GR, Pandey MR (1986) Historical earthquakes of Nepal. Bull Geol Soc Nepal 4:7–8Google Scholar
  17. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S (2008) Representative rainfall thresholds for landslides in the Nepal Himalaya. Geomorphology 100:429–443Google Scholar
  18. DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF, Stein S (1990) Current plate motions. Geophys J Int 101:425–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF, Stein S (1994) Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on current plate motions. Geophys Res Lett 21:2191–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunn JA, Auden JB, Gosh AMN, Roy SC (1939) The Bihar-Nepal earthquake of 1934. Mem Geol Surv India 73:391Google Scholar
  21. Erdik M, Durukal E (2008) Earthquake risk and its mitigation in Istanbul. Nat Hazards 44:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta SP (1988) Eastern Nepal earthquake 21 August 1988, damage and recommendations for repairs and reconstruction. Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  23. Hough SE, Bilham R (2008) Site response of the Ganges basin inferred from re-evaluated macroseismic observations from the 1897 Shillong, 1905 Kangra, and 1934 Nepal earthquakes. J Earth Syst Sci 117(S2):773–782Google Scholar
  24. JICA (2002) The study on Earthquake disaster mitigation in the Kathmandu Valley, Kingdom of Nepal, Japan International Cooperation Agency and the Ministry of Home Affairs of Nepal, Vol I, II, and IIIGoogle Scholar
  25. Molnar P (1984) Structure and tectonics of the Himalaya: constraints and Implications of geophysical data. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 12:489–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pandey MR, Molnar P (1988) The distribution of intensity of the Bihar-Nepal earthquake 15 January 1934 and bounds of the extent of the rupture zone. J Nepal Geol Soc 5:22–44Google Scholar
  27. Pandey MR, Tandukar RP, Avouac JP, Lavé J, Massot JP (1995) Interseismic strain accumulation on the Himalayan crustal ramp (Nepal). Geophys Res Lett 22(7):751–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rai SM, Upreti BN, Guillot S, Pêcher A, Fort PL (2004) Mineral chemistry (biotite, muscovite, garnet, and plagioclase) in the Kathmandu and Gosainkund regions, central Nepal Himalaya. J Nepal Geol Soc 30:55–66Google Scholar
  29. Rana BJB (1935) Nepal Ko Maha Bhukampa (Great earthquake of Nepal). Jorganesh Press, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  30. Sakai H, Fujii R, Kuwahara Y, Upreti BN, Shrestha SD (2001) Core drilling of the basin-fill sediments in the Kathmandu valley for paleoclimatic study: preliminary results. J Nepal Geol Soc 25(Sp):9–18Google Scholar
  31. SEAOC (1995) Vision 2000—A framework for performance based design. Structural Engineers Association of California, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. Seeber L, Armbruster J (1981) Great detachment earthquakes along the Himalaya arc and long-term forecasting in earthquake prediction: an international review. Maurice Ewing Ser 4:259–279Google Scholar
  33. Seeber L, Armbruster JG, Quittmeyer RC (1981) Seismicity and continental subduction in the Himalayan arc, in Zagros, Hindu-Kush, Himalaya, Geodynamic Evolution. Geodyn Ser 3:215–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stein RS, Yeats RS (1989) Hidden earthquakes. Sci Am 260:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wyss M (2005) Human losses expected in Himalayan earthquakes. Nat Hazards 34:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yeats RS, Thakur VC (1998) Reassessment of earthquake hazard based on a fault bend fold model of the Himalayan plate-boundary fault. Curr Sci 74:230–233Google Scholar
  37. Yeats RS, Nakata T, Farah A, Fort M, Mirza MA, Pandey MR, Stein RS (1992) The Himalayan frontal fault system. Annales Tectonicae 6(Sp):85–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amod Mani Dixit
    • 1
  • Ryuichi Yatabe
    • 2
  • Ranjan Kumar Dahal
    • 3
  • Netra Prakash Bhandary
    • 2
  1. 1.National Society for Earthquake Technology-Nepal (NSET)KathmanduNepal
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Science and EngineeringEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of GeologyTribhvuan UniversityKathmanduNepal

Personalised recommendations