Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 39–57 | Cite as

The emergence of “star disaster-affected areas” and its implications to disaster and communication interdisciplinary study: a Taiwan example from Typhoon Morakot

  • Chiung-wen Hsu
Original Paper
  • 364 Downloads

Abstract

This study explored the phenomenon of “star disaster-affected areas” created by media in Taiwan and its consequences. Taitung County was chosen as the study subject since it was covered in a biased large amount in 2009 Typhoon Morakot unprecedentedly. A content analysis of four major newspapers, in-depth interviews, and field research in Chialan and Dawu Township founds that media is the key player to create “star disaster-affected areas.” The factors of being “star disaster-affected areas” are the degree of impacted severity in the areas, the numbers of affected residents, casualty and death tolls, accessibility to affected areas, and most importantly human interests and visual impacts for better media storytelling. The consequences include uneven resources distributions and unfair reaction and recovery policies. This study provided implications for media workers, disaster management actors, residents, and media scholars to revisit ethics and theory to fit it the characteristics of disaster news and above all, disaster and communication scholars to develop an interdisciplinary study to facilitate disaster management.

Keywords

Star disaster-affected areas Media hype Typhoon Morakot Disaster and communication interdisciplinary study Disaster management Taiwan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by National Science Council (#99-2625-M-004-003-). The author would like to thank the reviewers and those who have helped this study all over the world.

References

  1. Chen LC, Liu YC, Chan KC (2006) Integrated community-based disaster management program in Taiwan: a case study of Shang-An village. Nat Hazards 37(1–2):209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Choi Y, Lin YH (2008) A content analysis of the newspaper coverage of the three major hurricanes in 2005. Public Relat Rev 34(3):294–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elmelund-Praestekaer C, Wien C (2008) What’s the fuss about? The interplay of media hypes and politics. Int J Press-Politics 13(3):247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ikeda S, Sato T, Fukuzono T (2008) Towards an integrated management framework for emerging disaster risks in Japan. Nat Hazards 44(2):267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim Y, Kang J (2010) Communication, neighbourhood belonging and household hurricane preparedness. Disasters 34(2):470–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee CC, Chen LC (2011) Who are the resident stakeholders in a flood project? A spatial analysis of resident stakeholders. Nat Hazards 59(1):107–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miles B, Morse S (2007) The role of news media in natural disaster risk and recovery. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Okamoto T (2004) A Discussion of the public nature of broadcasting. In: Okamoto T (ed) Disaster reporting and the public nature of broadcasting. NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute, Tokyo, pp 261–281Google Scholar
  9. Rashid H (2011) Interpreting flood disasters and flood hazard perceptions from newspaper discourse: tale of two floods in the Red River Valley, Manitoba, Canada. App Geogr 31(1):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rattien S (1990) The role of the media in Hazard Mitigation and disaster management. Disasters 14(1):36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Romo-Murphy E, James R, Adams M (2011) Facilitating disaster preparedness through local radio broadcasting. Disasters 35(4):801–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruigrok N, Scholten O et al (2009) Fitna and the media: a source-oriented media hype. Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap 37(3):238–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sekito T (2004) Lessons from the Great Hanshin Earthquake: From the perspectives of disaster reporting and public broadcasting. In: Okamoto T (ed) Disaster reporting and the public nature of broadcasting. NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute, Tokyo, pp 25–157Google Scholar
  14. Tanner A, Friedman DB, Koskan A, Barr D (2009) Disaster Communication on the Internet: a Focus on Mobilizing Information. J Health Commun 14(8):741–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vasterman PLM (2005) Media-hype: self-reinforcing news waves, journalistic standards and the construction of social problems. Eur J Commun 20(4):508–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vasterman PLM, Yzermans CJ, Dirkzwager AJE (2005) The role of the media and media hypes in the aftermath of disasters. Epidemiol Rev 27:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wei J, Zhao D, Liang L (2009) Estimating the growth models of news stories on disasters. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60(9):1741–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wei J, Zhao D, Yang F, Du S, Marinova D (2010) Timing crisis information release via television. Disasters 34(4):1013–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wien C, Elmelund-Praestekaer C (2009) An anatomy of media hypes developing a model for the dynamics and structure of intense media coverage of single issues. Eur J Commun 24(2):183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Cheng Chi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations