Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic hazard across Bulgaria and neighbouring areas: regional and site-specific maximum credible magnitudes and earthquake perceptibility

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 March 2013

Abstract

A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment is developed here using maximum credible earthquake magnitude statistics and earthquake perceptibility hazard. Earthquake perceptibility hazard is defined as the probability a site perceives ground shaking equal to or greater than a selected ground motion level X, resulting from an earthquake of magnitude M, and develops estimates for the most perceptible earthquake magnitude, M P(max). Realistic and usable maximum magnitude statistics are obtained from both whole process and part process statistical recurrence models. These approaches are extended to develop relationships between perceptible earthquake magnitude hazard and maximum magnitude recurrence models that are governed by asymptotic and finite return period properties, respectively. Integrated perceptibility curves illustrating the probability of a specific level of perceptible ground motion due to all earthquakes over the magnitude range extending from −∞ to a magnitude M i are then developed from reviewing site-specific magnitude perceptibility. These lead on to achieving site-specific annual probability of exceedance hazard curves for the example cities of Sofia and Thessaloniki for both horizontal ground acceleration and ground velocity. Both the maximum credible earthquake magnitude M 3 and the most perceptible earthquake magnitude M P(max) are of importance to the earthquake engineer when approaching anti-seismic building design. Both forms of hazard are illustrated using contoured hazard maps for the region bounded by 39°–45°N, 19°–29°E. Patterns are observed for these magnitude hazard estimates—especially M P(max) specific to horizontal ground acceleration and horizontal ground velocity—and compared to inferred patterns of crustal deformation across the region. The full geographic region considered is estimated to be subject to a maximum credible earthquake magnitude M 3—estimated using cumulative seismic moment release statistics—of 7.53 M w, calculated from the full content of the adopted earthquake catalogue, while Bulgaria’s capital, Sofia, is estimated a comparable value of 7.36 M w. Sofia is also forecast most perceptible earthquake magnitudes for the lowest levels considered for horizontal ground acceleration of M PA(50) = 7.20 M w and horizontal ground velocity of M PV(5) = 7.23 M w for a specimen focal depth of 15 km.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys NN (1974) Notes on engineering seismology. In: Solnes J (ed) Engineering seismology and earthquake engineering. Nato Advanced Study, pp 33–54

  • Ambraseys NN (1995) The prediction of earthquake peak ground acceleration in Europe. Earth Eng Struct Dyn 24:467–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN (2002) The seismic activity of the Marmara Sea region over the last 2000 years. Bull Seism Soc Am 92:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Adams RD (1998) The Rhodes earthquake of 26 June 1926. J Seismol 2:267–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:371–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motion from shallow earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earth Eng 3:1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Kaka SI (2006) Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion for New Madrid ShakeMaps, 27 pp. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/external/reports/05HQGR0039.pdf

  • Azzaro R, Barbano MS (1995) The Pollina (Northern Italy) earthquake of 26 June 1993: an application of the new European Macroseismic Scale 1992. Nat Hazards 12(3):289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Båth M (1973) Introduction to seismology. Birkäuser-Verlag, Basle, p 395

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss TJ, Burton PW (2007) A new earthquake catalogue for Bulgaria and the conterminous Balkan high hazard region. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7(3):345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bončev E, Bune VI, Christoskov L, Karagjugleva J, Kostadinov V, Reisner GJ, Rizhikova S, Shebalin NV, Sholpo VN, Sokerova D (1982) A method for compilation of seismic zoning prognostic maps for the territory of Bulgaria. Geologica Balcanica 12(2):3–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW (1978) Perceptible earthquakes in the United Kingdom. Geophys J R Astr Soc 54:475–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW (1981) Variations in seismic risk parameters in Britain. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium anal. Seismicity and on Seismic Hazard. Liblice (Czechoslovak Acad. Of Sciences), vol 2, pp 495–531

  • Burton PW (1990) Pathways to seismic hazard evaluation: extreme and characteristics earthquakes in areas of low and high seismicity. Nat Hazards 3:275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW, Makropoulos KC (1985) Seismic risk of circum-pacific earthquakes II. Extreme values using Gumbel’s third distribution and the relationship with strain energy release. PAGEOPH 123:849–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW, Main IG, Neilson G (1983) Seismic risk and the North Sea. In: Ritsema AR, Gurpinar A (eds) Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, 1–4 June 1982, Utrecht, Holland, in Seismicity and Seismic Risk in the Offshore North Sea Area. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 347–364

  • Burton PW, McGonigle R, Makropoulos KC, Üçer SC (1984) Seismic risk in Turkey, the Aegean and the eastern Mediterranean: the occurrence of large magnitude earthquakes. Geophys J R Astr 78:475–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW, Xu Y, Tselentis G-A, Sokos E, Aspinall W (2003) Strong ground acceleration seismic hazard in Greece and neighboring regions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23:159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW, Xu Y, Qin C, Tselentis G-A, Sokos E (2004a) A catalogue of seismicity in Greece and the adjacent areas for the twentieth century. Tectonophysics 390:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton PW, Qin C, Tselentis G-A, Sokos E (2004b) Extreme earthquake and earthquake perceptibility study in Greece and its surrounding area. Nat Hazards 32:227–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2003) Updated near-source ground motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bull Seism Soc Am 93(1):314–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporali A, Aichhorn C, Becker M, Fejes I, Gerhatova L, Ghitau D, Grenerczy G, Hefty J, Krauss S, Medak D, Milev G, Mojzes M, Mulic M, Nardo A, Pesec P, Rus T, Simek J, Sledzinski J, Solaric M, Stangl G, Vespe F, Virag G, Vodopivec F, Zablotskyi F (2008) Geokinematics of Central Europe: new insights from the CERGOP-2/environment project. J Geodyn 45(4–5):246–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocard M, Kahle H-G, Peter Y, Geiger A, Veis G, Felekis S, Paradissis D, Billiris H (1999) New constraints on the rapid crustal motion of the Aegean region: recent results inferred from GPS measurements (1993–1998) across the West Hellenic Arc, Greece. Earth Planet Sci Lett 172:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolce M, Masi A, Marino M, Vona M (2003) Earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) including site effects. Bull Earth Eng 1(1):115–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drakopoulos JC (1976) On the completeness of macroseismic data a) in the major area of Greece b) in the Balkan area. In: Proceedings of the seminar on seismic zoning maps UNESCO-Skopje, pp 132–156

  • Galanopoulos AG (1972) Annual and maximum possible strain accumulation in the major area of Greece. Annls Geol Pays Hell 24:467–480 [In Russian with English abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  • Glavcheva RP (1990) On the optimization of the correlation between the macroseismic intensity and accelerogram characteristics. Comptes rendus de l’Académie bulgare des Sciences 43(11):37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel EJ (1958) Statistics of extremes. Columbia University Press, New York, p 375

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutdeutsch R, Hammerl C (1999) An uncertainty parameter of historical earthquakes—the record threshold. J Seism 3(4):351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seism Soc Am 34:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Magnitude and energy of earthquakes. Ann Geofis 9(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, Kanamori H (1979) A moment magnitude scale. J Geophys Res 84(B5):2348–2350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger J (1956) A comparison of earthquake accelerations with intensity ratings. Bull Seism Soc Am 46:317–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein Ch, Müller MD, Geiger A, Kahle H-G (2008) Crustal motion and deformation in Greece from a decade of GPS measurements. Tectonophysics 449:17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt WE, Shen-Tu B, Haines AJ, Jackson JA (2000) On the determination of self-consistent strain rate fields within zones of distributed continental deformation. Hist Dyn Glob Plate Motions Geophys Monogr 121:113–141 (American Geophysical Union)

    Google Scholar 

  • International Seismological Centre (2012) On-line bulletin. International Seismological Centre, Thatcham. http://www.isc.ac.uk

  • Ishimoto M (1932) Echelle d’intensité sismique et acceleration maxima. Bull Earthq Res Inst 10(171):614–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle H-G, Müller MV, Geiger A, Danuser G, Mueller S, Veis G, Billiris H, Paradissis D (1995) The strain field in northwestern Greece and the Ionian Islands: results inferred from GPS measurements. Tectonophysics 249:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahle H-G, Straub C, Reilinger R, McClusky S, King R, Hurst K, Veis G, Kastens K, Cross P (1998) The strain rate field in the eastern Mediterranean region, estimated by repeated GPS measurements. Tectonophysics 294:237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (1977) The energy release in great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 82(20):2981–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawasumi H (1951) Measures of earthquake danger and expectancy of maximum intensity throughout Japan as inferred from the seismic activity in historical times. Tokyo Univ Earthq Res Inst Bull 29(3):469–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Koravos GCh, Main IG, Tsapanos TM, Musson RMW (2003) Perceptible earthquakes in the broad Aegean area. Tectonophysics 371:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotzev V, Nakov R, Burchfiel BC, King R, Reilinger R (2001) GPS study of active tectonics in Bulgaria: results from 1996 to 1998. J Geophys 31:189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotzev V, Nakov R, Georgiev Tz, Burchfiel BC, King RW (2006) Crustal motion and strain accumulation in western Bulgaria. Tectonophysics 413:127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos KC (1978) The statistics of large earthquake magnitude and an evaluation of Greek seismicity. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, p 193

  • Makropoulos KC, Burton PW (1983) Seismic risk of circum-Pacific earthquakes I. Strain energy release. PAGEOPH 121(2):247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos KC, Burton PW (1985) Seismic hazard in Greece. I. Magnitude recurrence. Tectonophysics 117:205–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev SV (1977) Seismic intensity scale MSK-76. Publ Inst Geophys Pol Acad C 117:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev S, Sponheuer W (1969) MSK scale of seismic intensity. In: Proceedings of the fourth world conference on earthquake engineering, Santiago, Chile, 1, A2

  • Musson RMW (1998) The barrow-in-furness earthquake of 15 February 1865: liquefaction from a very small magnitude event. Pure Appl Geophys 152(4):733–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann F (1954) Earthquake intensity and related ground motion. University of Washington Press, Seattle, p 77

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto S (1973) Introduction to earthquake engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Panza GF, Vaccari F, Costa G, Suhadolc P, Fäh D (1996) Seismic input modelling for zoning and microzoning. Earthq Spectr 12(3):529–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panza GF, Cazzaro R, Vaccari F (1997) Correlation between macroseismic intensities and seismic ground motion parameters. Ann Geofis 40(5):1371–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazachos BC, Comninakis PE, Karakaisis GF, Karakostas BG, Papaioannou ChA, Papazachos CB, Scordilis EM (2000) A catalogue of earthquakes in Greece and surrounding area for the period 550BC—1999. Publ. Geoph. Lab., Univ. Thessaloniki

  • Purcaru G, Berckhemer H (1978) A magnitude scale for very large earthquakes. Tectonophysics 49:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter CF (1958) Elementary seismology. Freeman, San Francisco, p 768

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebalin NV, Leydecker G, Mokrushina NG, Tatevossian RE, Erteleva OO, Vassilev VYu (1998) Earthquake catalogue for Central and Southeastern Europe 342BC-1990AD. Final report to contract ETNU-CT93-0087, 195 pp. http://www.bgr.bund.de/EN/Themen/Seismologie/Erdbebenauswertung_en/Kataloge_en/historisch/EU_centr_south_en.html;jsessionid=B263935985FFB95D213605FA7B168FA1.1_cid334?nn=1558132

  • Solakov D, Simeonova S, Christoskov L (2001) Seismic hazard assessment for the Sofia area. Annali di Geophys 44(3):541–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanishkova I, Slejko D (1991) Some seismotectonic characteristics of Bulgaria. Boll Geof Teor Appl 33:187–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesauro M, Hollenstein C, Egli R, Geiger A, Kahle H-G (2006) Analysis of central western Europe deformation using GPS and seismic data. J Geodyn 42:194–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher W, Hanks TC (1973) Source parameters of southern California earthquakes. J Geophys Res 78:8547–8576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodulidis NP, Papazachos BC (1992) Dependence of strong ground motion on magnitude-distance, site geology and macroseismic intensity for shallow earthquakes in Greece: I, Peak horizontal acceleration, velocity and displacement. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11:387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac MD, Brady AG (1975) On the correlation of seismic intensity scales with the peaks of recorded strong motion. Bull Seism Soc Am 65:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsapanos TM (1998) Seismic hazard for some regions of the world examined using strain energy release. J Balkan Geophys Soc 1(2):19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eck T, Stoyanov T (1996) Seismotectonics and seismic hazard modelling for Southern Bulgaria. Tectonophysics 262:77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H, Scrivner CW, Worden CB (1999a) TriNet “ShakeMaps”: rapid generation of peak ground motion and intensity maps for earthquakes in southern California. Earthq Spectr 15(3):537–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999b) Relationships between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity in California. Earthq Spectr 15(3):557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmore PL (ed) (1979) Manual of seismological observatory practice. World Data Center a for solid earth geophysics, Report SE-20, September 1979, Boulder, Colorado, p 165

  • Wu Y-M, Teng T-L, Shin T-C, Hsiao N-C (2003) Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and intensity in Taiwan. Bull Seism Soc Am 93:1386–1396

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Prof. Boyko Ranguelov of the Geophysical Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia for his advice, useful comments and constructive suggestions during the development of this research. The authors would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers of this paper for providing such positive and constructive feedback to allow its publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seismic Risk Group, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ, UK

    Thomas J. Bayliss & Paul W. Burton

Authors
  1. Thomas J. Bayliss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul W. Burton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Bayliss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bayliss, T.J., Burton, P.W. Seismic hazard across Bulgaria and neighbouring areas: regional and site-specific maximum credible magnitudes and earthquake perceptibility. Nat Hazards 68, 271–319 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0590-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0590-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation