Skip to main content
Log in

An effective procedure for seismic hazard analysis including nonlinear soil response

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) of Tehran, Iran, accounting the effect of nonlinear soil response. It is well-known that soil nonlinearity and its accurate prediction could play important role in seismic hazard study. For this purpose, two different approaches have been carried out for predicting the hazard curves by (1) applying site modifications to the ground motion prediction equation based on generic site classes and use of constant coefficients (2) using a close-form solution that modifies the hazard results at the rock level. Also, efficiency of the Monte Carlo method in modeling of amplification function for the six selected sites in the study area was examined. Results showed important effect of nonlinear soil response mainly for frequencies lower than 8 Hz, which should be considered properly in hazard estimation. As an interesting subject, influence of soil plasticity index (PI) on hazard estimation of clayey sites including the nonlinear soil response was evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectra attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:94–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson N, Atkinson G, Boore D, Bozorgnia Y, Campbell K, Chiou B, Idriss M, Silva W, Youngs R (2008) Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):45–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghabarati H, Tehranizade M (2009) Near-source ground motion attenuation relationship for PGA and PSA of the vertical and horizontal components. Bull Earthquake Eng 7:609–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amico V, Albarello D, Mucciarelli M (2002) Validation through HVSR measurements of a method for the quick detection of site amplification effects from intensity data: an application to a seismic area in Northern Italy. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22(6):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assimaki D, Li W (2012) Site and ground motion-dependent nonlinear effects in seismological model predictions. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 3:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Cassidy JF (2000) Integrated use of seismograph and strong-motion data to determine soil amplification: response of the Fraser River Delta to the Duvall and Georgia Strait earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 90(4):1028–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (2004a) Nonlinear soil-site effects in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis. Bull Seism Soc Am 96(6):2110–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (2004b) Ground-motion amplification in nonlinear soil sites with uncertain properties. Bull Seism Soc Am 94(6):2090–2109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benetatos CA, Kiratzi AA (2004) Stochastic strong ground motion simulation of intermediate depth earthquakes: the cases of the 30 May 1990 Vrancea (Romania) and of the 22 January 2002 Karpathos island (Greece) earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 24:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5 %-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equation for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquake. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):128–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (1970) Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bull Seism Soc Am 60:29–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2003) Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bull Seism Soc Am 93(1):314–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5 % damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):139–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cultrera G, Boore DM, Joyner WB, Dietel CM (1999) Nonlinear soil response in the vicinity of the Van Normal complex following the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 89(5):1214–1231

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquake in southern california, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bull Seism Soc Am 64(5):1363–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi H, Zare M, Fukushima Y, Koketsu K (2009) An empirical spectral ground motion model for Iran. J Seismol 13:499–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholipour Y, Bozorgnia Y, Rahnam M, Berberian M (2011) Probabilistic hazard analysis, greater tehran regions, final report (phase I), President Deputy Strategic Planning and Control

  • Haghshenas E, Bard PY, Theodulidis N (2008) Empirical evaluation of microtremor H/V spectral ratio. Bull Earthquake Eng 6(1):75–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hryciw RD, Rollins KM, Homolka M, Shewbridge SE, McHood M. (1991) Soil amplification at Treasure Island during the Loma Prieta earthquake. Proceedings of 2nd international conference on recent advance in geotech. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri 2:1679–1685

  • Idriss IM (1990) Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes. Proceedings of the symposium to honor H.B. Seed, Berkeley, CA, pp 273–289

  • International Institute of Engineering Earthquake and Seismology (IIEES) (2003) “Preliminary report on the Bam earthquake,”

  • Jafari MK, Razmkhah A (2001) Complementary Seismic geotechnical microzonation of south of Tehran. IIEES report, International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran, Iran (In Persian)

  • Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Razmkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of fine grained soil in south of Tehran. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 4(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkan E, Gülkan P (2004) Empirical attenuation equations for vertical ground motion in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra 20(3):853–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Lermo J, Chavez-Garcia FJ (1994) Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation? Bull Seism Soc Am 84(5):1350–1364

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundepi AK, Galiana-Merino JJ, Lindholm C, Kamal C (2010) Soil characteristics and site effect assessment in the city of Delhi (India) using H/V and f–k methods. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 30(7):591–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park D (2003) Estimation of non-linear seismic site effects for deep deposits of the Mississippi Embayment. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana

  • Park D, Hashash YMA (2005) Evaluation of seismic site factors in the Mississippi Embayment. II. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis with nonlinear site effects. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 25(2):145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlenko OV, Irikura K (2002) Nonlinearity in the response of soils in the 1995 Kobe earthquake in vertical components of records. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22:967–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlenko OV, Wen KL (2008) Estimation of nonlinear soil behavior during the 1999 Chi–Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Pure Appl Geophys 165:373–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayhani MHT, El Naggar MH, Tabatabaei SH (2008) Nonlinear analysis of local site effects on seismic ground response in the Bam earthquake. Geotech Geol Eng 26:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter L (1990) Earthquake hazard analysis: issues and insights. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roumelioti Z, Beresnev IA (2003) Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the 1999 Chi–Chi, Taiwan, earthquake: application to rock and soil sites with implications for nonlinear site response. Bull Seism Soc Am 93(4):1691–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadigh K, Chang C.-Y, Egan JA, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):180–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Smit P (2004) On the use of response spectral-reference data for the selection and ranking of ground motion models for seismic-hazard analysis in regions of moderate seismicity: the case of rock motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:2164–2185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report no. UCB/EERC-72/12, Earthquake Engineering Research center, University of California, Berkeley, December, P 102

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil module and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. College of Engineering University of California Berkeley, Berkeley

  • Seed HB, Murarka R, Lysmer J, Idriss IM (1976) Relationships between maximum acceleration, maximum velocity, distance from source and local site conditions for moderately strong earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Am 66(4):1323–1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva WJ, Lee R, McGuire RK, Cornell CA (2000) A comparison of methodologies to achieve a site-specific PSHA. Seism Res Lett 71:247 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov VY, Loh CH, Jean WY (2007) Application of horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) Fourier spectral ratio for analysis of site effect on rock (NEHRP-class B) sites in Taiwan. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 27(4):314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifuance MD, Todorovska MI (1996) Nonlinear soil response-1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Geotech Eng 122(9):725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CCP (2000) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis considering nonlinear site effects. Bull Seism Soc Am 90:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S (2012) A new method for ranking and weighting of earthquake ground-motion prediction models. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 39:78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Lam NTK (2010) Ground motion modelling in Tehran based on the stochastic method. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 30:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Tsang HH (2011) A new site classification approach based on artificial neural networks. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 31:974–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaghmaei-Sabegh S, Shoghian Z, Sheikh MN (2011) A new model for the prediction of earthquake ground motion duration in Iran. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9990-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuxian H, Chen HY (1992) Probabilistic analysis of uncertainties in seismic hazard assessment. Struct Safety 11:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., Motallebzade, R. An effective procedure for seismic hazard analysis including nonlinear soil response. Nat Hazards 64, 1731–1752 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0332-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0332-0

Keywords

Navigation