Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 237–257 | Cite as

Water-deficit-based drought risk assessments in Taiwan

  • Jenq-Tzong Shiau
  • Ya-Yi Hsiao
Original Paper

Abstract

Taiwan is located in Western Pacific and receives approximate 2,500 mm rainfall per year. Suffered from inadequate water supply during prolonged and severe droughts, assessing drought risk becomes one of the key tasks of water-resources planning and management in Taiwan. Well-prepared drought mitigation measures require assimilation of physical environment of droughts and human socioeconomic factors. An index-based approach is presented in this study to evaluate drought risk at municipal scale in Taiwan for current status (2008) as well as future scenarios (2021). A multiplicative formula links drought hazard (frequency, duration, and severity of droughts), drought exposure (water use), and drought vulnerability (unreliable water supply) to determine drought risk. This approach quantifies the spatial distribution of drought risk and is able to deal with future changes of water use and water-supply source and to examine their influences on drought risk assessments. The results reveal that the regions that are at great risk in the future are those regions already threaten by drought currently. Changes of future water use and water-supply source would not significantly alter spatial distribution of drought risk and ranking order among regions. These results present a basis for future water-resources planning and economic developments for each municipal region.

Keywords

Drought Risk Hazard Exposure Vulnerability 

References

  1. Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Carius A, Eierdanz F, Klein R, Krömker D, Tänzler D (2008) A new approach to quantifying and comparing vulnerability to drought. Reg Environ Change 8(4):137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Below R, Grove-Kopec E, Dilley M (2007) Documenting drought-related disasters: a global reassessment. J Environ Dev 16(3):328–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hall J, Murphy C (2010) Vulnerability analysis of future public water supply under changing climate conditions: a case study of the Moy catchment, Western Ireland. Water Resour Manag≠ 24(13):3527–3545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hall JW, Sayers PB, Dawson RJ (2005) National-scale assessment of current and future flood risk in England and Wales. Nat Hazards 36(1–2):147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamouda MA, El-Din MMN, Moursy FI (2009) Vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in the Eastern Nile Basin. Water Resour Manage 20(13):2697–2725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. He B, Lu AF, Wu JJ, Zhao L, Liu M (2011) Drought hazard assessment and spatial characteristics analysis in China. J Geogr Sci 21(2):235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Joe H (1997) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Kao SC, Govindaraju RS (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kron W (2005) Flood risk = hazard · values · vulnerability. Water Int 30(1):58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kulshreshtha SN (1998) A global outlook for water resources to the year 2025. Water Resour Manage 12(3):167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu CL, Zhang Q, Singh VP, Cui Y (2011) Copula-based evaluations of drought variations in Guangdong, South China. Nat Hazards 59(3):1533–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: Proceedings of the 8th conference on applied climatology, pp 179–184Google Scholar
  13. Meyer V, Scheuer S, Haase D (2009) A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany. Nat Hazards 48(1):17–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mirabbasi R, Fakheri-Fard A, Dinpashoh Y (2012) Bivariate drought frequency analysis using the copula method. Theor Appl Climatol 108(1–2):191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mirakbari M, Ganji A, Fallah SR (2010) Regional bivariate frequency analysis of meteorological droughts. J Hydrol Eng 15(12):985–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishra KM, Singh VP (2011) Drought modeling—a review. J Hydrol 403:157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelsen RB (1999) An introduction to copulas. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Odeh D (2002) Natural hazard vulnerability assessment for statewide mitigation planning in Rhode Island. Nat Hazard Rev 4(3):177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pandey RP, Pandey A, Galkate RV, Byun HR, Mal BC (2010) Integrating hydro-meteorological and physiographic factors for assessment of vulnerability to drought. Water Resour Manage 24(15):4199–4217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peduzzi P, Dao H, Herold C, Mouton F (2009) Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: the disaster risk index. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(4):1149–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peters E, Torfd PJJF, Van Lanen HAJ, Bier G (2003) Propagation of drought through groundwater—a new approach using linear reservoir theory. Hydrol Process 17(15):3023–3040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reddy MJ, Ganguli P (2011) Application of copulas for derivation of drought severity-duration-frequency curves. Hydrol Process. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8287 (in press)
  23. Serinaldi F, Bonaccorso B, Cancelliere A, Grimaldi S (2009) Probabilistic characterization of drought properties through copulas. Phys Chem Earth 34(10–12):596–605Google Scholar
  24. Shahid S, Behrawan H (2008) Drought risk assessment in the western part of Bangladesh. Nat Hazards 46(3):391–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shiau JT (2006) Fitting drought duration and severity with two-dimensional copulas. Water Resour Manage 20(5):795–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shiau JT, Lee HC (2005) Derivation of optimal hedging rules for a water-supply reservoir through compromise programming. Water Resour Manage 19(2):111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shiau JT, Modarres R (2009) Copula-based drought severity-duration-frequency analysis in Iran. Meteorol Appl 16(4):481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shiau JT, Feng S, Nadarajah S (2007) Assessment of hydrological droughts for the Yellow River, China using copulas. Hydrol Process 21(16):2157–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shiau JT, Modarres R, Nadarajah S (2012) Assessing multi-site drought connections in Iran using empirical copula. Environ Model Assess. doi: 10.1007/s10666-012-9318-2 (in press)
  30. Simpson DM, Human RJ (2008) Large-scale vulnerability assessments for natural hazards. Nat Hazard 47(2):143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sklar K (1959) Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leura marges, Publications de l’Institut ds Statistique de l’Université de Paris, vol 8, pp 229–231Google Scholar
  32. Song S, Singh VP (2010) Frequency analysis of droughts using Plackett copula and parameter estimation by genetic algorithm. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 24(5):783–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sullivan CA (2011) Quantifying water vulnerability: a multi-dimensional approach. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 25(4):627–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tallaksen LM, Van Lanen HAJ (2004) Hydrological drought: processes and estimation methods for streamflow and groundwater. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  35. Tingsanchali T, Karim MF (2005) Flood hazard and risk analysis in the southwest region of Bangladesh. Hydrol Process 19(10):2055–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tingsanchali T, Karim F (2010) Flood-hazard assessment and risk-based zoning of a tropical flood plain: case study of the Yom River, Thailand. Hydrol Sci J 55(2):145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tran P, Shaw R, Chantry G, Norton J (2009) GIS and local knowledge in disaster management: a case study of flood risk mapping in Viet Nam. Disasters 33(1):152–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Water Resources Agency (WCA) (2009) The water potential demand assessment and management strategy review in Taiwan. TaipeiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hydraulic and Ocean EngineeringNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations