Natural Hazards

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 387–401 | Cite as

Damage characteristics and influence factors of mountain tunnels under strong earthquakes

Original Paper


A total of 81 mountain tunnels that were damaged in 10 strong earthquakes are studied. They are classified into six typical damage characteristics: lining cracks, shear failure of lining, tunnel collapse caused by slope failure, portal cracking, leaking, and deformation of sidewall/invert damage. Further study and discussion are carried out on influencing factors for mountain tunnels, including seismic parameters, structural information, and rock conditions. Suggestions are also made regarding seismic resistance and reduction.


Mountain tunnel Seismic damage characteristic Influencing factor Failure mechanism Seismic resistance 



This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50908169), State Key Laboratory of Geo-Hazard Prevention and Geo-Environment Protection (Grant No. SKLGP2011K009), Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT, IRT1029), and the Kwang-Hua Fund for College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University. All supports are gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Chen ZY, Wang CH (2011) Design and exploitation of damage database under earthquake for underground structure in VB. (Submitted to Rock and Soil Mechanics)Google Scholar
  2. Chen GH, Li HQ, Zhong Y, Li YS (2008) Investigation and analysis on damage of state road 213 Dujiang Dam to Wenchuan. Southwest Road (4):114–119 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. Dowding CH, Rozen A (1978) Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 104(GT2):175–191Google Scholar
  4. Duke CM, Leeds DJ (1959) Effects of earthquakes on tunnels, protective construction in a nuclear age, vol 1. In: Proceedings of the second protective construction symposium, 24–26 March, pp 303–328Google Scholar
  5. Gong ZH (2007) Study on the seismic safety evaluation of Huangcaoping Tunnel of National Road No. 318. Dissertation, Chengdu University of Technology (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. International Tunneling Association Working Group on Maintenance and Repair of Underground Structures (1991) Report on the damaging effects of water on tunnels during their working life. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 6(1):11–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Li YS (2006) Study on earthquake responses and vibration-absorption measures for mountain tunnel. Dissertation, Tongji University (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. Li TB (2008) Failure characteristics and influence factor analysis of mountain tunnels at epicenter zones of great Wenchuan Earthquake. Journal of Engineering Geology 16(6):742–750 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Luo WH (1989) Overview of underground structure damage under earthquake of home and aboard. Tunn Undergr Space Eng 10(3):61–65Google Scholar
  10. Pan SC (1996) Review on anti-seismic problems on tunnels and underground structures. World Tunn (5):7–16 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. Power MS, Rosidi D, Kaneshiro, JY (1998) Seismic vulnerability of tunnels and underground structures revisited. In: Ozedimir L (ed) Proceedings of the North American Tunneling’98, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 243–250Google Scholar
  12. Rowe R (1992) Tunneling in seismic zones. Tunn Tunn 24(12):41–44Google Scholar
  13. Sharma S, Judd WR (1991) Underground opening damage from earthquakes. Eng Geol 30:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shen YS, Gao B, Wang ZZ, Wang XY (2008) Model test for a road tunnel in the region of high seismic intensity. Mod Tunn Technol 45(5):38–42 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Shen YS, Gao B, Wang XY (2009) Structural dynamic properties analysis for portal part of mountain tunnel in strong earthquake area. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 28(1):3131–3136 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. Shimizu M, Suzuki T, Kato S et al. (2007) Historical damages of tunnels in Japan and case studies of damaged railway tunnels in the Mid Niigata prefecture earthquakes. Underground space—the 4th dimension of metropolises, pp 1937–1943Google Scholar
  17. Shunzo O (1984) Introduction to earthquake engineering, 2nd edn. University of Tokyo Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang WL, Wang TT, Su JJ, Lin CH, Seng CR, Huang CH (2001) Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16(3):133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang XY, Liu WN, Zhang M (2003) Study on the categorization and mechanism of seismic damage of underground structures. China Saf Sci J 13(11):55–58 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Xiao LG (2000) Causes, law and prevention of underground structure destruction. Dissertation, Southwest Jiaotong University (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Yakovlevich DI, Borisovna MJ (1978) Behavior of tunnel liner model on seismic platform. VI Sump on Earthquake Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, pp 379–382Google Scholar
  22. Yan XS, Zhu HH, Wang YC (2009) Several characteristics of seismic response of mountain-crossing tunnels. Tunn Constr 29(4):420–423 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of EducationTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Geo-Hazard Prevention and Geo-Environment ProtectionChengdu University of TechnologyChengduChina

Personalised recommendations