Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Natural disaster management mechanisms for probabilistic earthquake loss

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High rates of urbanization, environmental degradation, and industrial development have affected all nations worldwide, but in disaster-prone areas, the impact is even greater serving to increase the extent of damage from natural catastrophes. As a result of the global nature of environmental change, modern economies have had to adapt, and sustainability is an extremely important issue. Clearly, natural disasters will affect the competitiveness of an enterprise. This study focuses on natural disaster management in an area in which the direct risks are posed by the physical effects of natural disasters such as floods, droughts, tsunamis, and rising sea levels. On a local level, the potential impact of a disaster on a company and how much damage (loss) it causes to facilities and future business are of concern. Each company must make plans to mitigate predictable risk. Risk assessments must be completed in a timely manner. Disaster management is also very important to national policy. Natural disaster management mechanisms can include strategies for disaster prevention, early warning (prediction) systems, disaster mitigation, preparedness and response, and human resource development. Both governmental administration (public) and private organizations should participate in these programs. Participation of the local community is especially important for successful disaster mitigation, preparation for, and the implementations of such measures. Our focus in this study is a preliminary proposal for developing an efficient probabilistic approach to facilitate design optimization that involves probabilistic constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Hillel M (1980) The base rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychol 44:211–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque CE, Etkin D (2007) People and community as constituent parts of hazards: the significance of societal dimensions in hazards analysis. Nat Hazards 41(2):271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu WK, Huang PC, Chen CW, Chang CC, Hung DM, Chiang WL (2011) An integrated flood risk assessment model for property insurance industry in Taiwan. Natural Hazards, doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9732-9

  • Katayama H, Bennett D (1999) Agility, adaptability and leanness: a comparison of concepts and a study of practice. Int J Prod Econ 60–61:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power DJ, Sohal AS, Rahman S (2001) Critical success factors in agile natural disaster risk management: an empirical study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist 31(4):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prater E, Biehl M, Smith MA (2001) International natural disaster risk control tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(5/6):823–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers R, Krywkow J, van der Veen A (2008) Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 46(3):307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage AP (1977) Interpretive structural modeling: methodology for largescale systems. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena JP, Sushil Vrat P (1990) The impact of indirect relationships in classification of variables—A MICMAC analysis for energy conservation. System Research 7(4):245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh MD, Shankar R, Narain R, Agarwal A (2003) Knowledge management in engineering industries—an interpretive structural modeling. J Adv Manag Res 1(1):27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CH, Chen CW (2010) An earthquake disaster management mechanism based on risk assessment information for the tourism industry—a case study from the island of Taiwan. Tour Manag 31(4):470–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CH, Chen CW (2011) The establishment of a rapid natural disaster risk assessment model for the tourism industry. Tour Manag 32(1):158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng CP, Chen CW (2011) A new viewpoint on risk control decision models for natural disasters, Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9861-1

  • Tseng CP, Chen CW, Liu FR (2011) Risk control allocation model for pressure vessels and piping project. J Vib Control. doi:10.1177/1077546311403182

  • UN/ISDR (2002) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives, preliminary version prepared as an interagency effort coordinated by the ISDR Secretariat, Geneva

  • Waddell D, Sohal AS (1998) Resistance: a constructive tool for change management. Manag Decis 36(8):543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfield JW (1974) Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transcr Syst Men and Cybern 4(1):51–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi CS, Lee JH, Shim MP (2010) GIS-based distributed technique for assessing economic loss from flood damage: pre-feasibility study for the Anyang stream Basin in Korea. Nat Hazards 55(2):251–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Adeleye EO, Sivayoganathan K (2004) Agile natural disaster risk capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur J Oper Res 159:379–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou HJ, Wang JA, Wan JH et al (2010) Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective. Nat Hazards 53(1):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Wu Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tseng, CP., Chen, CW. Natural disaster management mechanisms for probabilistic earthquake loss. Nat Hazards 60, 1055–1063 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9889-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9889-2

Keywords

Navigation