Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp 47–60 | Cite as

Organizing social resilience in the context of natural hazards: a research note

  • Gerard Hutter
Original Paper

Abstract

Organizational scholars increasingly use the term “resilience” to analyze options of dealing with uncertain context conditions. What do these scholars have to offer to researchers in the field of natural hazards? This research note makes three suggestions. First, the research note frames social resilience—in contrast to a rigid response to radical change—as a process of broadening information-based activities, loosening formal controls, and using slack resources of organizational members. Second, the research note argues to leave the meaning of social resilience undefined at the outset of a research project with the aim of building theory about resilience. It is expected that a useful definition emerges in empirical research. Third, organizational studies highlight specific social structures and processes of social resilience, for instance, small groups of individuals in organizational and interorganizational contexts. Organizing becomes a crucial factor for dealing with natural hazards.

Keywords

Floods Organizing Radical change Resilient response Small groups Threat-rigidity thesis 

References

  1. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related. Prog Human Geogr 24(3):347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich HE, Ruef M (2006) Organizations evolving. Sage, London/Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett CK, Pratt MG (2000) From threat-rigidity to flexibility. Toward a learning model of autogenic crisis in organizations. J Org Change Manag 13(1):74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum JAC (ed) (2002) The Blackwell companion to organizations. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41:283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borgatti SP, Foster PC (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. J Manag 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
  7. Brand FS, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 12(1), onlineGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll JS, Rudolph JW, Hatakenaka S (2003) Learning from organizational experience. In: Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA (eds) The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Blackwell, Malden, USA, pp 575–600Google Scholar
  9. Comfort LK, Sungu Y, Johnson D, Dunn M (2001) Complex systems in crisis: anticipation and resilience in dynamic environments. J Conting Crisis Manag 9(3):144–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Smith RP (eds) (2008) The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Daft RL, Weick KE (1984/2001) Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Reprinted in: Weick KE Making sense of the organization. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 241–258Google Scholar
  12. Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA (eds) (2003) The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Blackwell, Malden, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt K (1989/1995) Building theories from case study research. Reprinted in: Huber GP, Van de Ven AH (eds) Longitudinal field research methods. Studying processes of organizational change. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 65–90Google Scholar
  14. Felgentreff C, Glade T (eds) (2008) Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunderson L (2010) Ecological and human community resilience in response to natural disasters. Ecol Soc 15(2), onlineGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollnagel E (2006) Resilience: the challenge of the unstable. In: Hollnagel E, Woods D, Leveson N (eds) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Burlington, pp 9–17Google Scholar
  17. Hutter G (2007) Strategic planning for long-term flood risk management: some suggestions for learning how to make strategy at regional and local level. Int Plan Stud 12(3):273–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutter G (2011) Planning for risk reduction and organizing for resilience in the context of natural hazards. In: Mueller B (ed) Urban regional resilience: how do cities and regions deal with change?. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 101–112Google Scholar
  19. Jones C, Lichtenstein BB (2008) Temporary inter-organizational projects: how temporal and social embeddedness enhance coordination and manage uncertainty. In: Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Smith RP (eds) The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 231–255Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan HB (2005) Understanding the concept of resilience. In: Goldstein S, Brooks RB (eds) Handbook of resilience in children. Springer, New York, pp 39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz N, Lazer D, Arrow H, Contractor N (2005) The network perspective on small groups: theory and research. In: Poole MS, Hollingshead AB (eds) Theories of small groups. Interdisciplinary perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 277–312Google Scholar
  22. Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environ Hazards 5:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Knight L (2002) Network learning: exploring learning by interorganizational networks. Human Relat 55(4):427–454Google Scholar
  24. Kuhlicke C, Kruse S (2009) Nichtwissen und Resilienz in der lokalen Klimaanpassung. Widersprüche zwischen theoriegeleiteten Handlungsempfehlungen und empirischen Befunden am Beispiel des Sommerhochwassers 2002. GAIA 18(3):247–254Google Scholar
  25. Masten AS, Cutuli JJ, Herbers JE, Reed M-GJ (2009) Resilience in development. In: Snyder CR, Lopez SJ (eds) Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 117–131Google Scholar
  26. Pelling M (2011) Adaptation to climate change. From resilience to transformation. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Perrow C (1986) Complex organizations: a critical essay. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Poole MS, Van de Ven A (eds) (2004) Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Raab J, Kenis P (2009) Heading toward a society of networks: empirical developments and theoretical challenges. J Manag Inq 18(3):198–210Google Scholar
  30. Sitkin SB (1996) Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses. In: Cohen MD, Sproull LS (eds) Organizational learning. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 541–577Google Scholar
  31. Staw BM, Sandelands LE, Dutton JE (1981) Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multilevel analysis. Adm Sci Q 26(4):501–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steinführer A, Kuhlicke C, de Marchi B, Scolobig A, Tapsell S, Tunstall S (2009) Local communities at risk from flooding. Social vulnerability, resilience and recommendations for flood risk management in Europe. Leipzig (UFZ)Google Scholar
  33. Sutcliffe K, Vogus TJ (2003) Organizing for resilience. In: Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE (eds) Positive organizational scholarship. Foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, pp 94–110Google Scholar
  34. Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged scholarship. A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):510–540Google Scholar
  36. Van de Ven AH, Polley DE, Garud R, Venkataraman S (1999) The innovation journey. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Wijk R, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2003) Knowledge and networks. In: Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA (eds) The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Blackwell, Malden/USA, pp 428–453Google Scholar
  38. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Weick KE (2001) Making sense of the organization. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Weick KE (2009) Making sense of the organization, vol 2. The impermanent organization. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  41. Weick KE, Quinn RE (1999) Organizational change and development. Annu Rev Psychol 50:361–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weick KE, Sutcliffe K (2001) Managing the unexpected. Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  43. Weick KE, Sutcliffe K (2007) Managing the unexpected. Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  44. Weick KE, Sutcliffe K, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. In: Staw BM, Cummings L (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 21, pp 81–123Google Scholar
  45. Wildavsky A (1991) Searching for safety. Transaction, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Ecological and Regional Development (IOER)DresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations