Probabilistic winter storm risk assessment for residential buildings in Germany
- 291 Downloads
Losses resulting from winter storms contribute a significant part to the overall losses among all natural hazards in most mid-latitude European countries. A realistic assessment of storm risk is therefore essential for prevention and coping measures. The paper presents a framework for probabilistic storm risk assessment for residential buildings which is exemplarily performed for Germany. Two different approaches are described, and results are presented. The hazard-based approach brings together hazard, vulnerability and building assets to calculate risk curves for each community. The storm-based approach uses loss information from past storm events to calculate statistical return periods of severe storms. As a result, a return period of 83 years to the most severe storm series in 1990 is calculated. Average annual losses of €170 million to residential buildings are calculated for all over Germany. The study demonstrates how the approaches complement each other and how validation is performed.
KeywordsWinter storm Risk Hazard Vulnerability Storm damage Residential buildings Germany
This work is part of the Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (http://www.cedim.de), a joint venture of the German Research Center for Geosciences in Potsdam (GFZ), the University of Karlsruhe (TH) and Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK). We thank the institutions for financial support.
- Bresch D, Bisping M, Lemcke G (2000) Storm over Europe: an underestimated risk. Swiss Reinsurance Company, ZurichGoogle Scholar
- Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- GDV (2009) Yearbook 2009, Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e.V. (GDV), Berlin, 144 ppGoogle Scholar
- Heneka P (2007) Winter storm damage—risk of residential buildings in the German state of Baden-Württemberg, PhD thesis (in German), Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
- Leckebusch GC, Ulbrich U, Fröhlich L, Pinto JG (2007) Property loss potentials for European midlatitude storms in a changing climate. Geophys Res Lett 34:L05703 (4 pp)Google Scholar
- Leicester R, Bubb C, Dorman C, Beresford F (1979) An assessment of potential cyclone damage to dwellings in Australia. In: Cermak J (ed) Proceedings of the fifth international conference on wind engineering, vol 1, pp 23–36Google Scholar
- Munich Re (2002) Winter storms in Europe (II). Analysis of 1999 losses and loss potentials, Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft, MünchenGoogle Scholar
- Munich Re (2007) Zwischen Hoch und Tief—Wetterrisiken in Europa, Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft, MünchenGoogle Scholar
- Petak W, Atkisson A (1982) Natural hazard risk assessment and public policy. Springer, USAGoogle Scholar
- Simmons AJ, Gibson JK (2000) The ERA-40 Project plan. ECMWF report series 1: readingGoogle Scholar
- Uppala SM, Kålberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, da Costa Bechtold V, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Anderson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, van den Berg L, Bidlot J, Borman N, Caires S, Dethof A, Dragosavac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Hólm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, Jenne R, McNally AP, Mahfouf J-F, Mocrette J-J, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012. doi: 10.1256/qj.04.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar