Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of industrial and commercial asset values for hazard risk assessment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For risk analyses not only knowledge about the impact of different types of hazards, but also information about the elements and values at risk is necessary. This article introduces a methodology for a countrywide estimation of asset values for commercial and industrial properties using Germany as an example. It consists of a financial appraisal of asset values on the municipal level and a further disaggregation by means of land use data. Novelties are the distinction of 60 economic activities, the consideration of production site sizes and the application of a dasymetric mapping technique for a sector-specific estimation and disaggregation of asset values. A validation with empirical data confirms the feasibility of the calculation. The resulting maps can be used for loss estimations e.g. in the framework of cost–benefit analyses that aim to evaluate hazard mitigation measures or for portfolio analyses by banks and insurance companies. The approach can be used for other countries if the necessary data is available (mainly in industrialized countries). In any case, it reveals the critical points when estimating commercial and industrial asset values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BELF (Der Bundesminister für Ernährung Landwirtschaft und Forsten) (1990) Bewertungsgutachten für Deichbauvorhaben an der Festlandküste—Modellgebiet Wesermarsch. Research Report, BELF, Bonn

  • BKG (Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie) (2004) ATKIS® DLM1000, VG250

  • Blong R (2003) A new damage index. Nat Hazards 30(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büchele B, Kreibich H, Kron A, Thieken AH, Ihringer J, Oberle P, Merz B, Nestmann F (2006) Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. NHESS 6:485–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen K, McAneney J, Blong R, Leigh R, Hunter L, Magill C (2004) Defining area at risk and its effect in catastrophe loss estimation: a dasymetric mapping approach. Appl Geogr 24:97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DLR/UBA (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt / Umweltbundesamt) (2002) CORINE Land Cover Data 2000 (CLC2000)

  • Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K (2003) A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. J Hydrol 277:24–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eicher CL, Brewer CA (2001) Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation: implementation and evaluation. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 28(2):125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2002) Statistical classification of economic activities in the European community, NACE Rev.1.1, http://europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat/ramon/. Accessed 1 Dec 2007

  • FEAG (FEAG Germany) (2003) Zahl der Betriebe und ihrer Beschäftigten, FEAG, data centre, 30 June 2003

  • FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2003) HAZUS-MH MR1, Flood model, technical manual. Department of Homeland, Technical Report.

  • FSOG (Federal Statistical Office Germany) (2002) Klassifikation der Wirtschaftszweige. Ausgabe 2003, FSOG, Wiesbaden

  • FSOG (Federal Statistical Office Germany) (2003) Databases: GENESIS-Online and GENESIS-Online Regional, data provided on: Stock of fixed assets (MEI-assets) for useful animals and plants, Stock of fixed assets (MEI-assets) for immaterial assets, Stock of fixed assets (buildings and MEI-assets) for 60 economic activities in Germany, Stock of fixed assets (buildings and MEI-assets) for three economic activities in the 16 federal states of Germany, Number of employees for 32 economic activities in the 16 federal states of Germany, Number of production sites for twelve economic activities in the 16 federal states of Germany, Data on price indices, Status: 2003

  • Geldermann J, Merz M, Bertsch V, Hiete M, Rentz O, Seifert I, Thieken AH, Borst D, Werner U (2007) The reference installation approach for the estimation of industrial assets at risk. Eur J Ind Eng 2(1):73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heneka P, Hofherr T, Ruck B, Kottmeier C (2006) Winter storm risk of residential structures—model development and application to the German state of Baden-Württemberg. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:721–733

    Google Scholar 

  • ICPR (International Commission for the Protection of the River Rhine) (2001a) Übersichtskarten der Überschwemmungsgefährdung und der möglichen Vermögensschäden am Rhein, Report. ICPR, Koblenz

  • ICPR (International Commission for the Protection of the River Rhine) (2001b) Atlas der Überschwemmungsgefährdung und möglicher Schäden bei Extremhochwasser am Rhein. ICPR, Koblenz

  • INFAS Geodaten (2001) Das data warehouse. INFAS GEOdaten GmbH, Bonn, Dezember 2001

  • Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1):11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich H, Müller M, Thieken AH, Petrow T, Merz B (2007) Flood precaution of companies and their ability to cope with the flood in August 2002 in Saxony, Germany. Water Resour Res 43:W03408. doi:10.1029/2005WR004691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich H, Seifert I, Merz B, Thieken AH (submitted) Development of FLEMOcs—a new model for the estimation of flood losses in the commercial sector. Hydrol Sci J

  • Mennis J (2003) Generating surface models of population using dasymetric mapping. Prof Geogr 55(1):31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer V (2005) Methoden der Sturmflut-Schadenspotenzialanalyse an der Deutschen Nordseeküste. PhD Thesis, University of Hannover, Germany

  • Mohaupt-Jahr B, Keil M (2004) The CLC 2000 project in Germany and environmental applications of land use information. In: Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt) (ed) Workshop: CORINE Land cover 2000 in Germany and Europe and its use for environmental applications, Berlin, 20–21 Jan 2004

  • MURL (Ministerium für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes 891 Nordrhein-Westfalen) (2000) Potentielle Hochwasserschäden am Rhein in 892 NRW. Report, Düsseldorf, Germany

  • NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences) (2004) Summary of databases in HAZUS-MH. NIBS

  • Parker DJ, Green CH, Thompson PM (1987) Urban flood protection benefits: a project appraisal guide. Gower Technical Press, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell E, Johnson C, Tunstall S, Tapsell S, Morris J, Chatterton J, Green C (2005a) The benefits of flood and coastal risk management: a handbook of assessment techniques. Middlesex University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell E, Johnson C, Tunstall S, Tapsell S, Morris J, Chatterton J, Green C (2005b) The benefits of flood and costal risk management: a manual of assessment techniques. Middlesex University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Radke S (2006) Verkehr in Zahlen 2006/2007, Bd. 35. Deutscher Verkehrs-Verlag, Jahrgang

    Google Scholar 

  • Scawthorn C, Flores P, Blais N, Seligson H, Tate E, Chang S, Mifflin E, Thomas W, Murphy J, Jones C, Lawrence M (2006) HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. Damage and loss assessment. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):72–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalwasser O, Schidlowski M (2006) Kapitalstockrechung in Deutschland. Wirtsch Stat 11:1102–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider PJ, Schauer BA (2006) HAZUS—Its development and its future. Nat Hazards Rev 7(2):40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieken AH, Müller M, Kleist L, Seifert I, Borst D, Werner U (2006) Regionalisation of asset values for risk analyses. NHESS 6(2):167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyagunov S, Grünthal G, Wahlström R, Stempniewski L, Zschau J (2006) Seismic risk mapping for Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:573–586. (Special Issue: Methods for risk assessment and mapping in Germany)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was done within the research project MEDIS (Methods for the evaluation of direct and indirect flood losses), which has been funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) (No. 0330688) within the research programme RIMAX (Risk management of extreme flood events). Cooperation partner was the CEDIM (Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology), which is a joint venture between the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ), the University of Karlsruhe (TH) and the Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK). Their financial and data supports are gratefully acknowleged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Seifert.

Glossary of used terms and abbreviations

ATKIS

Official topographic and cartographic information system (Amtliches topographisch-kartographisches Informationssystem)

Branch variability

Variation of the stock of fixed assets between 60 different economic branches.

CLC2000

CORINE Land Cover data as at the year 2000; CORINE stands for Coordination of Information on the Environment

FEAG

Federal Employment Agency of Germany

FSOG

Federal Statistical Office of Germany

GIS

Geo information system

“Master”-production site

If a company has more than one production site in the same municipality all production sites were counted as one “master”-production site.

MEI assets

Sum of machinery, equipment and immaterial assets

Spatial variability

Variation of the stock of fixed assets in space i.e. between 16 federal states

WZ 2003

German classification system of economic activities, based on the European Nomenclature of economic activities (NACE—Nomenclature statistique des Activites economiques dans la Communaute Europenne; Eurostat 2002)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seifert, I., Thieken, A.H., Merz, M. et al. Estimation of industrial and commercial asset values for hazard risk assessment. Nat Hazards 52, 453–479 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9389-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9389-9

Keywords

Navigation