Natural Hazards

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 329–342 | Cite as

Patterns in the Turkish reinsurance claim data, 1998–2002: An application of the extreme value theory

Research Article


The devastating 1999 Marmara and Düzce earthquakes led to a significant increase in the earthquake studies in Turkey in geological, engineering and financial aspects. Extreme Value Theory (EVT) has a range of applications from stock market changes to natural disasters like floods and hurricanes. Here EVT is fitted to the ordinary and earthquake reinsurance claims of Turkey.


Earthquakes Paid claims Extreme Value Theory (EVT) Generalised Pareto Distribution (GPD) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bibbee A, Gönenç R, Jacobs S, Konvitz J, Price R (2000) Economic effects of the 1999 Turkish earthquakes: an interim report. Technical report, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 247, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. Embrechts P, Klüppelberg C, Mikosch T (1997) Modelling extremal events for insurance and finance. Springer, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  3. Erdik M (2000) Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce (Turkey) earthquakes. Technical report, Department of Earthquake Engineering, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey (
  4. Gençay, R, Selçuk, F, Ulugülyagci, A 2001Evim: a software package for extreme value analysis in MATLABStud Nonlinear Dyn Econ5213239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kleindorfer P, Sertel M (2001) Mitigation and financing of seismic risks: Turkish and international perspectives, vol 3 of NATO science series-IV. Earth and environmental sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. KOERI (1999) Technical report, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Centre (KOERI), İstanbul, Turkey (
  7. Özerdem, A, Barakat, S 2000After the Marmara earthquake: lessons for avoiding short cuts to disastersThird World Quart21425439Google Scholar
  8. Reiss R-D, Thomas M (2001) Statistical analysis of extreme values with applications to insurance, finance, hydrology and other fields. Birkhäuser, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. USGS (1999) Implications for earthquake risk reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999. Technical Report 1193, U.S. Geological Survey Circular (
  10. Wallis, J, Hosking, J 1987Parameter and quantile estimation for the Generalised Pareto DistributionTechnometrics29339349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Woo G (1999) The mathematics of natural catastrophes. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Yucemen MS (2005) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake insurance rates for Turkey, Nat. Hazards 31, 291–313Google Scholar
  13. Zanetti A, Enz R, Hitz L, Hess T (2000) Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 1999: storms and earthquakes lead to the second highest-losses in insurance industry. Technical Report 2/2000, Swiss Re, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsLondon School of EconomicsLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations