Advertisement

A framework for strategy formulation in sustainable supply chains: a case study in the electric industry

  • María D. Gracia
  • Luis E. Quezada
Article

Abstract

The aim of a sustainable supply chain is the strategic integration of all social, environmental and economic goals within an organization, through a systematic coordination of key business processes in order to improve the long-term economic performance of a company and its value chain. This paper describes a new methodological approach to support the strategy formulation process in sustainable supply chains. The proposed methodology combines three analytical tools (analytic hierarchical process, fuzzy multi-objective optimization, and clustering methods) within a strategy formulation process, integrating the competitive and corporative strategies with the supply chain strategy on the basis of sustainability. A case study in the Mexican Federal Commission of Electricity Gulf-Center Distribution Division shows the capability of our proposed framework. This company is large and complex enough to encompass the whole issue of the supply chain. Results indicate that our methodology is a valid decision support tool to formulate a set of sustainable supply chain strategies, and it is able to generate a coordinated strategy for the management of a sustainable supply chain.

Keywords

Supply chain management Sustainable supply chains Supply chain strategy Strategy formulation Analytical hierarchical process Sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52(10), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2013). An Integrated QFD Framework with Multiple Formatted and Incomplete Preferences: a Sustainable Supply Chain Application. Applied Soft Computing, 13(9), 3931–3941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carifio, L., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education, 42(12), 1150–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter, C.R., & Rogers, D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38, 360–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cash, R., & Wilkerson, T. (2003). GreenSCOR: Developing a Green Supply Chain Analytical Tool (No. LMI-LG101T4), 2003, Logistics Management Institute.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cetinkaya, B. (2011). Developing a Sustainable Supply Chain Strategy. In Cetinkaya, B., Cuthbertson, R., Ewer, G., Klaas-Wissing, T., Piotrowicz, W., & Tyssen, C. (Eds.), Sustainable Supply Chain Management, pp. 17–55. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chua Chow, C., & Luk, P. (2005). A strategic service quality approach using analytic hierarchy process. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 15(3), 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hadighi, S.A., Sahebjamnia, N., Mahdavi, I., & Shirazi, M.A. (2013). A framework for strategy formulation based on clustering approach: a case study in a corporate Organization. Knowledge-Based Systems, 49, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hallgren, M., & Olhager, J. (2006). Quantification in manufacturing strategy: A methodology and illustration. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(1), 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harland, C.M. (1996). Supply chain management: relationships, chains and networks. British Journal of Management, 7(s1), S63–S80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hatamlou, A., Abdullah, S., & Nezamabadi-pour, H. (2012). A combined approach for clustering based on K-means and gravitational search algorithms. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 6, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P.K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kang, S.H., Kang, B., Shin, K., Kim, D., & Han, J. (2012). A theoretical framework for strategy development to introduce sustainable supply chain management. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 631–635.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krause, D.R., Vachon, S., & Klassen, R.D. (2009). Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management: introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar, M., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2006). A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 101(2), 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee, A.H. (2009). A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2879–2893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Platts, K.W. (1994). Characteristics of methodologies for manufacturing strategy formulation. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 7(2), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Platts, K.W., Mills, J.F., Neely, A.D., Gregory, M.J., & Richards, A.H. (1996). Evaluating manufacturing strategy formulation processes. International Journal of Production Economics, 46, 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saaty, R.W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3), 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saaty, T.L., Peniwati, K., & Shang, J.S. (2007). The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 46(7), 1041–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sekhari, A.S., Ratan, S.R.A., Rahman, M., Bouras, A.A., & Ouzrout, Y. (2010). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: State-of-the-Art. In Proceedings of International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management and Applications. Paro, Bhutan.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Seuring, S. (2013). A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decision Support Systems, 54(4), 1513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S.S., & Thakur, L.S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8182–8192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Starik, M., & Rands, G.P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 908–935.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun, X.T., & Collins, R.J. (2009). Systems thinking, relationship management and supply chains. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Conference The International Society for the Systems Sciences Conference. Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sullivan, G.M., & Artino, A.R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Symeonaki, M., Michalopoulou, C., & Kazani, A. (2015). A fuzzy set theory solution to combining Likert items into a single overall scale (or subscales). Quality & Quantity, 49(2), 739–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tiwari, R.N., Dharmar, S., & Rao, J.R. (1987). Fuzzy goal programming—an additive model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 24(1), 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van Hoek, R.I. (1999). From reversed logistics to green supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4(3), 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zack, M.H. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhu, K.J., Jing, Y., & Chang, D.Y. (1999). A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), 450–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zimmermann, H.J. (1987). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zimmermann, H.J. (1993). Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringUniversidad Autonoma de TamaulipasTamaulipasMexico
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Santiago of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations