A network economic game theory model of a service-oriented internet with choices and quality competition
This paper develops a new dynamic network economic model of Cournot-Nash competition for a service-oriented Internet in the case of service differentiation and quality competition. Each service provider seeks to maximize its own profit by determining its service volumes and service quality. We utilize variational inequality theory for the formulation of the governing Nash equilibrium as well as for the computational approach. We then construct the projected dynamical systems model, which provides a continuous-time evolution of the service providers service volumes and service quality levels, and whose set of stationary points coincides with the set of solutions to the variational inequality problem. We recall stability analysis results using a monotonicity approach and construct a discrete-time version of the continuous-time adjustment process, which yields an algorithm, with closed form expressions at each iteration. The algorithm is then utilized to compute the solutions to several numerical examples. A sensitivity analysis is also conducted.
KeywordsGame theory Service differentiation Quality competition Service-oriented internet Variational inequalities Projected dynamical systems
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Clark, D.D. (1988). The design philosophy of the DARPA Internet protocols. In Proceedings of ACM annual conference of the special interest group on data communication (SIGCOMM) (pp. 106–114). Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- 7.Faulhaber, G.R., & Hogendorn, C. (2000). The market structure of broadband telecommunications. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(3), 305–329.Google Scholar
- 8.Fox, A., Gribble, S.D., Chawathe, Y., Brewer, E.A., Gauthier, P. (1997). Cluster-based scalable network services. In ACM SIGOPS operating systems review (Vol. 31, pp. 7891). ACM.Google Scholar
- 9.Gabay, D., & Moulin, H. (1980). On the uniqueness and stability of Nash equilibria in noncooperative games. In Applied stochastic control of econometrics and management science. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- 12.Nagurney, A. (1999). Network economics: a variational inequality approach second and revised editon. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- 18.Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. In Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, USA (Vol. 36, pp. 48–49).Google Scholar
- 20.Niyato, D., & Hossain, E. (2006). WLC04-5: bandwidth allocation in 4G heterogeneous wireless access networks: a noncooperative game theoretical approach. In Proceedings of IEEE global telecommunications conference (pp. 1–5). San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
- 21.Njoroge, P., Ozdaglar, A., Stier, N., Weintraub, G. (2009). Competition, market coverage, and quality choice in interconnected platforms. In Proceedings of NetEcon09. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- 22.Njoroge, P., Ozdaglar, A., Stier, N., Weintraub, G. (2010). Weintraub. Investment in two sided markets and the net neutrality debate. Columbia University, Decision, Risk and Operations Working Papers Series, Tech. Rep. DRO-2010-05.Google Scholar
- 23.Okuguchi, K., & Szidarovszky, F. (1990). The theory of oligopoly with multi-product firms. In Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (p. 342). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- 24.Parzy, M., & Bogucka, H. (2010). QoS support in radio resource sharing with Cournot competition. In Proceedings of 2nd international workshop on cognitive information processing (pp. 93–98). Elba Island, Italy.Google Scholar
- 25.Postel, J. (1981a). Internet Protocol. RFC 791, Information Sciences Institute.Google Scholar
- 26.Postel, J. (1981b). Transmission Control Protocol. RFC 793, Information Sciences Institute.Google Scholar
- 27.Radonjic, V., Acimovic-Raspopovic, V., Kostic-Ljubisavljevic, A. (2011). Quality of experience in Cournot competition model for pricing next generation networks. In Proceedings of 5th international quality conference (pp. 363–370). Kragujevac, Serbia: University of Kragujevac.Google Scholar
- 30.van Moorsel, A. (2001). Metrics for the internet age: quality of experience and quality of business.Google Scholar
- 31.Varian, H.R. (1996). Economic issues facing the Internet. http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/hal/Papers/econ-issues-internet. Accessed 25 December 2012.
- 32.Vives, X. (1999). Oligopoly pricing: old ideas and new tools. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 34.Wolf, T., Grifoen, J., Calvert, K., Dutta, R., Rouskas, G., Baldine, I., Nagurney, A. (2012). Choice as a principle in network architecture. In SIGCOMM12. Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- 35.Zhang, Z., Nabipay, P., Odlyzko, A., Gurin, R.A. (2010). Interactions, competition and innovation in a service-oriented internet: an economic model. In IEEE INFOCOM 2010 mini-conference (pp. 46–50). San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
- 37.Zhang, K., Wang, Y., Shi, C., Wang, T., Feng, Z. (2011). A non-cooperative game approach for bandwidth allocation in heterogeneous wireless networks. In Proceedings of IEEE vehicular technology conference (pp. 1–5). San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar