Neurochemical Research

, Volume 37, Issue 9, pp 1906–1914 | Cite as

Fastigial Nucleus Electrostimulation Reduces the Expression of Repulsive Guidance Molecule, Improves Axonal Growth Following Focal Cerebral Ischemia

  • Fan Jiang
  • Honglei Yin
  • Xinyue Qin
Original Paper


The role of repulsive guidance molecule A (RGMa) in cerebral ischemia remains unclear. In the study, we examined the expression of RGMa in ischemic brain tissues following focal cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (IR) in rats. An established middle cerebral artery suture occlusion model was employed. A dipolar electrode was placed into the cerebellum to stimulate the cerebellar fastigial nucleus for 1 h at 2 h after ischemia. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to measure the mRNA RGMa and its downstream mediator, Ras homolog A (RhoA). Immunohistochemistry was applied to detect RGMa and RhoA expressions and to evaluate axonal regeneration by optical density analysis of 200 kDa neurofilaments. We found that both mRNA and protein levels of RGMa and RhoA were increased in the ischemic cortex and hippocampus 48 h following cerebral IR and these elevated levels were maintained for 2 weeks. Electrostimulation of the fastigial nucleus reduced the expression of RGMa and RhoA at 24 h and 2 weeks following cerebral IR. In addition, axonal growth was enhanced in the fastigial nucleus electrostimulated group compared to non-stimulated ischemic animals (P < 0.05). RGMa/RhoA expression was negatively correlated with the growth of axons (P < 0.05). Therefore, we concluded that RGMa and RhoA could be another key molecule and might inhibit axonal regeneration during cerebral IR injury. Electrostimulation of the fastigial nucleus enhances axonal growth, possibly by reducing the expression of RGMa and RhoA after cerebral IR.


Repulsive guidance molecule Ras homolog A Fastigial nucleus electrostimulation Axonal regeneration Cerebral ischemia–reperfusion 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 30770762, 30970978) to Xinyue Qin, and a fund from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (No: YXJJ2009-02).

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no competing interests.


  1. 1.
    Giger RJ, Venkatesh K, Chivatakarn O, Raiker SJ, Robak L, Hofer T, Lee H, Rader C (2008) Mechanisms of CNS myelin inhibition: evidence for distinct and neuronal cell type specific receptor systems. Restor Neurol Neurosci 26:97–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Teng FY, Tang BL (2005) Why do Nogo/Nogo-66 receptor gene knockouts result in inferior regeneration compared to treatment with neutralizing agents? J Neurochem 94:865–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Govek EE, Newey SE, Van Aelst L (2005) The role of the Rho GTPases in neuronal development. Genes Dev 19:1–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Monnier PP, Sierra A, Macchi P, Deitinghoff L, Andersen JS, Mann M, Flad M, Hornberger MR, Stahl B, Bonhoeffer F, Mueller BK (2002) RGM is a repulsive guidance molecule for retinal axons. Nature 419:392–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brinks H, Conrad S, Vogt J, Oldekamp J, Sierra A, Deitinghoff L, Bechmann I, Alvarez-Bolado G, Heimrich B, Monnier PP, Mueller BK, Skutella T (2004) The repulsive guidance molecule RGMa is involved in the formation of afferent connections in the dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 24:3862–3869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidtmer J, Engelkamp D (2004) Isolation and expression pattern of three mouse homologues of chick Rgm. Gene Expr Patterns 4:105–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oldekamp J, Kramer N, Alvarez-Bolado G, Skutella T (2004) Expression pattern of the repulsive guidance molecules RGM A, B and C during mouse development. Gene Expr Patterns 4:283–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yoshida J, Kubo T, Yamashita T (2008) Inhibition of branching and spine maturation by repulsive guidance molecule in cultured cortical neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 372:725–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hata K, Fujitani M, Yasuda Y, Doya H, Saito T, Yamagishi S, Mueller BK, Yamashita T (2006) RGMa inhibition promotes axonal growth and recovery after spinal cord injury. J Cell Biol 173:47–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gessert S, Maurus D, Kuhl M (2008) Repulsive guidance molecule A (RGM A) and its receptor neogenin during neural and neural crest cell development of Xenopus laevis. Biol Cell 100:659–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conrad S, Genth H, Hofmann F, Just I, Skutella T (2007) Neogenin-RGMa signaling at the growth cone is bone morphogenetic protein-independent and involves RhoA, ROCK, and PKC. J Biol Chem 282:16423–16433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Del Bo A, Sved AF, Reis DJ (1984) Fastigial nucleus stimulation and concurrent activation of cardiovascular receptors; differentiate effects on arterial pressure, heart rate and vasopressin release. J Hypertens Suppl 2:S49–S51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miura M, Reis DJ (1971) The paramedian reticular nucleus: a site of inhibitory interaction between projections from fastigial nucleus and carotid sinus nerve acting on blood pressure. J Physiol 216:441–460PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al Senawi DE, Downman CB (1983) Cardiac arrhythmic response evoked by stimulation of fastigial nuclei in the anesthetized cat. J Auton Nerv Syst 8:15–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hernandez JP, Xu F, Frazier DT (2004) Medial vestibular nucleus mediates the cardiorespiratory responses to fastigial nuclear activation and hypercapnia. J Appl Physiol 97:835–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhuang J, Xu F, Frazier DT (2008) Hyperventilation evoked by activation of the vicinity of the caudal inferior olivary nucleus depends on the fastigial nucleus in anesthetized rats. J Appl Physiol 104:1351–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reis DJ, Doba N, Nathan MA (1973) Predatory attack, grooming, and consummatory behaviors evoked by electrical stimulation of cat cerebellar nuclei. Science 182:845–847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berntson GG, Schumacher KM (1980) Effects of cerebellar lesions on activity, social interactions, and other motivated behaviors in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 94:706–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang F, Iadecola C (1993) Fastigial stimulation increases ischemic blood flow and reduces brain damage after focal ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 13:1013–1019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Golanov EV, Zhou P (2003) Neurogenic neuroprotection. Cell Mol Neurobiol 23:651–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galea E, Golanov EV, Feinstein DL, Kobylarz KA, Glickstein SB, Reis DJ (1998) Cerebellar stimulation reduces inducible nitric oxide synthase expression and protects brain from ischemia. Am J Physiol 274:H2035–H2045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Galea E, Glickstein SB, Feinstein DL, Golanov EV, Reis DJ (1998) Stimulation of cerebellar fastigial nucleus inhibits interleukin-1beta-induced cerebrovascular inflammation. Am J Physiol 275:H2053–H2063PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou P, Qian L, Zhou T, Iadecola C (2005) Mitochondria are involved in the neurogenic neuroprotection conferred by stimulation of cerebellar fastigial nucleus. J Neurochem 95:221–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Golanov EV, Reis DJ (1999) Neuroprotective electrical stimulation of cerebellar fastigial nucleus attenuates expression of periinfarction depolarizing waves (PIDs) and inhibits cortical spreading depression. Brain Res 818:304–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koizumi JYY, Nakazawa T, Ooneda G (1986) Experimental studies of ischemic brain edema. 1. A new experimental model of cerebral embolism in rats in which recirculation can be introduced in the ischemic area. Jpn J Stroke 8:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Longa EZ, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, Cummins R (1989) Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke 20:84–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reis DJ, Berger SB, Underwood MD, Khayata M (1991) Electrical stimulation of cerebellar fastigial nucleus reduces ischemic infarction elicited by middle cerebral artery occlusion in rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 11:810–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Golanov EV, Liu F, Reis DJ (1998) Stimulation of cerebellum protects hippocampal neurons from global ischemia. NeuroReport 9:819–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schwab JM, Conrad S, Monnier PP, Julien S, Mueller BK, Schluesener HJ (2005) Spinal cord injury-induced lesional expression of the repulsive guidance molecule (RGM). Eur J Neurosci 21:1569–1576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shin GJ, Wilson NH (2008) Overexpression of repulsive guidance molecule (RGM) a induces cell death through Neogenin in early vertebrate development. J Mol Histol 39:105–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    GrandPre T, Li S, Strittmatter SM (2002) Nogo-66 receptor antagonist peptide promotes axonal regeneration. Nature 417:547–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fournier AE, Takizawa BT, Strittmatter SM (2003) Rho kinase inhibition enhances axonal regeneration in the injured CNS. J Neurosci 23:1416–1423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yamashita T, Mueller BK, Hata K (2007) Neogenin and repulsive guidance molecule signaling in the central nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:29–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurology, Department of NeurologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations