Advertisement

Neurophysiology

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 327–337 | Cite as

State of Synaptic Inhibition in Smooth Muscles of the Colon of Individuals of Different Ages

  • M. M. Grusha
  • O. V. Romanenko
Article
  • 8 Downloads

We examined the state of synaptic inhibition in smooth muscles (SMs) of the intestinal tract with special attention to the gender and age aspects. One hundred thirty-seven samples of the SMs taken from the circular layer of the colon wall of 22 women of different age (group IF, younger than 35 years, group IIF, 36–55 years, group IIIF, 56–74 years, and group IVF, 75 years and more) and 24 men (group IM, younger than 35 years, group IIM, 36–60 years, group IIIM, 61–74 years, and group IVM, 75 years and more). The state of synaptic inhibition was estimated according to values of the amplitude/kinetic parameters of inhibitory synaptic potentials (ISPs) in SM strips taken from different visually normal parts of the colon in the course of surgical interventions; the respective sites were at a distance of at least 10 cm form a pathologically modified zone of the colon. Parametric and nonparametric approaches were used in detailed statistical analysis of these parameters. No statistically significant differences were found between most amplitude/kinetic parameters of ISPs in the colonic SMs of women and men within all age groups and between these parameters in different age groups of women and men. Such results confirm the statement that, in humans, the efficacy of inhibitory synaptic transmission to SMs of the colon is mostly preserved during the entire lifespan, even against the background of age-related involution changes in the organism.

Keywords

colon of the humans smooth muscles synaptic inhibition amplitude/kinetic parameters age-related involution changes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M.J. Saffrey, “Aging of the mammalian gastrointestinal tract: a complex organ system,” Age, 36, 1019-1032 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Blashut, L. Paradowski, and J. Garcarek, “Prevalense and distribution of the colonic diverticulosis. Rewiew of 417 cases from Lower Silesia in Poland,” Rom. J. Gastroenterol., 13, No. 4, 281-285 (2004).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. De Giorgio, E. Ruggeri, V. Stanghellini, et al., “Chronic constipation in the elderly: a primer for the gastroenterologist,” BMC Gastroenterol., 15, No. 130, 1-13 (DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0366-3) (2015).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. V. Roque and E. P. Bouras, “Epidemiology and management of chronic constipation in elderly patients,” Clin. Interv. Aging, 10, 919-930 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. F. Gallegos-Orozco, A. E. Foxx-Orenstein, S. M. Sterler, and J. M. Stoa, “Chronic constipation in the elderly,” Am. J. Gastroenterol., 107, 18-25 (2012).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Britton and J. T. McLaughlin, “Ageing and the gut,” Proc. Nutr. Soc., 72, 173-177 (2013).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Ostan, D. Monti, P. Gueres, et al., “Gender, aging and longevity in humans: an update of an intriguing/ neglected scenario paving the way to a gender-specific medicine,” Clin. Sci., 130, 1711-1725 (2016).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.R. Wade and T. Cowen, “Neurodegeneration: a key factor in the ageing gut,” Neurogastroenterol. Motil., 16, Suppl. 1, 19-23 (2004).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. H. Knowles and C. D. Martin, “Slow transit constipation: a model of human gut dysmotility. Review of possible aethiologies,” Neurogastroenterol. Mot., 12, 181-196 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. J. Yun, K. A. Bazar, and P. Y. Lee, “A new mechanism for diverticular diseases: aging-related vagal withdrawal,” Med. Hypotheses, 64, No. 2, 252-255 (2005).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Burnstock, “Purinergic signaling,” Br. J. Pharmacol., 147, S172-S181 (2006).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Gallego, V. Gil, J. Aleu, et al., “Purinergic and nitrergic junction potential in the human colon,” Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol., 295, G522-G533 (2008).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. F. Shuba, I. A. Vladimirova, and I. B. Philyppov, “Mechanisms of the inhibitory action of neurotransmitters on smooth muscles,” Neurophysiology, 35, Nos. 3/4, 252-261 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. K. Goyal, M. P. Sullivan, and A. Chaudhury, “Progress in understanding of inhibitory purinergic neuromuscular transmission in the gut,” Neurogastroenterol. Mot., 25, 203-207 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Romanenko and М. М. Grusha, “Synaptic inhibition of smooth muscles of the human colon: Effects of vitamin B6 and its derivatives,” Neurophysiology, 38, No. 4, 217-227 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    М. М. Grusha and A. V. Romanenko, “Synaptic inhibition in colonic smooth muscles in humans of different age groups,” Neurophysiology, 44, No. 2, 106-114 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. M. Crain, M. Nikodemova, and J. J. Wotters, “Expression of P2 nucleotide receptors varies with age and sex in murine brain microglia,” J. Neuroinflammation, 6, No. 24, 1-16 (2009).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Burnstock and R. W. Straub, “A method for studying the effects of ions and drugs on the resting and action potentials in smooth muscle with external electrodes,” J. Physiol., 140, 156-167 (1958).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. R. Kirkwood and J. A. C. Sterne, Essential Medical Statistics, Blackwell Publ. (2003).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Petrie and C. Sabin. Medical Statistics at a glance, Blackwell Science (2000).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. A. Vladimirova, V. P. Zagorodnyuk, I. V. Ostrovsky, et al., “Ultrasound-induced changes in synaptic processes with different transmitters in smooth muscles,” Neurophysiology, 25, No. 4, 251-256 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. Salles, “Basic mechanisms of the aging gastrointestinal tract,” Dig. Dis., 25, 112-117 (2007).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Gallagher and D. O’Mahony, “Constipation in old age,” Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol., 23, 875-887 (2009).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O. A. Gomes, R. R. de Souza, and E. A. Liberti, “A preliminary investigation of the effects of aging on the nerve cell number in the myenteric ganglia of the human colon,” Gerontol., 43, 210-217 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. Takahashi, A. Qoubaitary, C. Owyang, et al., “Decreased expression of nitric oxide synthase in the colonic myenteric plexus of aged rats,” Brain. Res., 883, 15-21 (2000).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. Roberts, D. Gelperin, and J. W. Wiley, “Evidence for age-associated reduction in acetylcholine release and smooth muscle response in the rat colon,” Am. J. Physiol., 267, G515-G552 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. T. Asuzu, Y. Hayashi, F. Izbeki, et al., “Generalized neuromuscular hypoplasia, reduced smooth muscle myosin and altered gut motility in the klotho model of premature aging,” Neurogastroenterol. Motil., 23, e309-e323 (2011).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. P. Gamage, R. N. Ranson, B. A. Patel, et al., “Myenteric neuron numbers are maintained in aging mouse distal colon,” Neurogastroenterol. Motil., 25, e495-e505 (2013).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bogomolets National Medical University of the Ministry of Public Health of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations