Sympathetic Skin Response and Boston Questionnaire in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
- 39 Downloads
We aimed to determine relations between the sudomotor efferent nerve fiber function and Boston questionnaire in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Median-nerve sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) evoked by wrist stimulation were recorded in 108 CTS patients and compared with those in 88 healthy volunteers. The Boston questionnaire form (BQF) was applied to patients. All patients and healthy individuals were questioned about the autonomic symptoms in the hand (red or purple coloration, excessive sweating, and feeling cold). The average SSR latencies of the patients with CTS were significantly longer than those in the control group (P < 0.001). Positive significant, while weak, correlation was found between the SSR latency, autonomic symptoms, and total sympathetic system scores. No statistically significant relationship was found between the Boston symptom severity, functional capacity scores, and SSR latency. The latter obtained through wrist stimulation was sensitive to support the sudomotor sympathetic dysfunction in patients with CTS. As we found no relationship between the BQF and SSR, these indices may evaluate different aspects of CTS.
Keywordscarpal tunnel syndrome sympathetic skin response sympathetic activity sudomotor activity Boston questionnaire
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Sh. J. Oh, Clinical Electromyography. Nerve Conduction Studies, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia (2003).Google Scholar
- 2.Y. Kaplan, S. G. Kurt, and H. Karaer, “Carpal tunnel syndrome in postmenopausal women,” J. Neurol. Sci., 270, Nos. 1-2, 77-81 (2008).Google Scholar
- 3.C. K. Jablecki, M. T. Andary, Y. T. So, et al., “Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee,” Muscle Nerve, 16, No. 12, 1392–1414 (1993).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.J. Verghese, A. S. Galanopoulou, and S. Herskovitz, “Autonomic dysfunction in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome,” Muscle Nerve, 23, No. 8, 1209-1213 (2000).Google Scholar
- 14.American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, “Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement),” Neurology, 43, No. 11, 2404–2405 (1993).Google Scholar
- 20.N. Heybeli, R. A. Ozerdemoglu, O. G. Aksoy, and E. F. Mumcu, “Functional and symptomatic scoring used for the assessment of outcome in carpal tunnel release,” Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc., 35, No. 2, 147-151 (2001).Google Scholar
- 22.S. Akman, E. Erturer, M. Celik M, et al., “The results of open surgical release in carpal tunnel syndrome and evaluation of follow-up criteria,” Acta. Orthop. Traumatol. Turc., 36, No. 3, 259-264 (2002).Google Scholar