Advertisement

Neurophysiology

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 441–447 | Cite as

Attenuation of Formalin-Induced Inflammatory Nociception by Propentofylline: Modulation of Glia

  • M.-L. Sun
  • H.-X. Yu
  • J. Tian
  • Y.-Q. Yu
Article
  • 83 Downloads

We examined the effects of propentofylline (PPF) injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v., 30 mM, 10 μl) into female Sprague–Dawley rats on pain responses in the formalin test and on the number of glial fibrillary acidic protein-immunopositive (GFAP-ip) astrocytes in the caudatoputamen (CPu) and periaqueductal grey (PAG) of these animals. The mean durations of flinch and lifting/biting of the limb in the PPF group vs. the vehicle (normal saline) group within phase 1 of the pain response were 280.0 ± ± 71.6 vs. 401.0 ± 69.0 sec and 69.5 ± 34.8 vs. 145.5 ± 18.6 sec, respectively (P > 0.05 in both cases, n = 7). During phase 2, the respective figures were 152.6 ± 104.0 vs. 1602.7 ± 100.9 sec and 79.1 ± ± 69.1 vs. 376.1 ± 56.5 sec (P < 0.01 in both cases). The mean numbers of GFAP-positive astrocytes per slice observed in the PPF and vehicle groups in the CPu were 35 ± 3.1 vs. 55 ± 1.9 (P < 0.01, n = 7), and those in the PAG were 30 ± 2.2 vs. 49 ± 1.2 (P < 0.01, n = 11). Thus, i. c.v. administration of PPF suppresses inflammatory pain induced by formalin injection in rats; there are reasons to believe that glial cells (astrocytes) in certain brain structures are intensely involved in the formation of a sensation of inflammatory pain.

Keywords

astrocytes formalin test pain propentofylline caudatoputamen periaqueductal grey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Dublin and M. Hanani, “Satellite glial cells in sensory ganglia: their possible contribution to inflammatory pain,” Brain. Behav. Immun., 21, No. 5, 592–598 (2007).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Maeda, A. Kawamoto, Y. Yatani, et al., “Gene transfer of GLT-1, a glial glutamate transporter, into the spinal cord by recombinant adenovirus attenuates inflammatory and neuropathic pain in rats,” Mol. Pain., 4, 65 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Vitkovic, J. Bockaert, and C. Jacque, “Inflammatory” cytokines: neuromodulators in normal brain? J. Neurochem., 74, No. 2, 457–471 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. S. Deng, J. H. Zhong, and X. F. Zhou, “Effects of endogenous neurotrophins on sympathetic sprouting in the dorsal root ganglia and allodynia following spinal nerve injury,” Exp. Neurol., 164, No. 2, 344–350 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. F. Zhou, Y. S. Deng, C. J. Xian, et al., “Neurotrophins from dorsal root ganglia trigger allodynia after spinal nerve injury in rats,” Eur. J. Neurosci., 12, No. 1, 100–105 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. U. Saragovi and K. Gehring, “Development of pharmacological agents for targeting neurotrophins and their receptors,” Trends. Pharmacol. Sci., 21, No. 3, 93–98 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. E. Parkinson, A. R. Paterson, J. D. Young, et al., “Inhibitory effects of propentofylline on [3H]adenosine influx. A study of three nucleoside transport systems,” Biochem. Pharmacol., 46, No. 5, 891–896 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Ohkubo, Y. Mitsumoto, and T. Mohri, “Characterization of the uptake of adenosine by cultured rat hippocampal cells and inhibition of the uptake by xanthine derivatives,” Neurosci. Lett., 133, No. 2, 275–278 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Yao, X. Y. Chang, Y. X. Chu, et al., “Antiallodynic effects of propentofylline Elicited by interrupting spinal glial function in a rat model of bone cancer pain,” J. Neurosci. Res., 89, No. 11, 1877–1886 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. L. Tawfik, M. R. Regan, C. Haenggeli, et al., “Propentofylline-induced astrocyte modulation leads to alterations in glial glutamate promoter activation following spinal nerve transection,” Neuroscience, 152, No. 4, 1086–1092 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. E. Ringheim, “Glial modulating and neurotrophic properties of propentofylline and its application to Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 903, 529–534 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Paxinos, C. Watson, M. Pennisi, et al., “Bregma, lambda and the interaural midpoint in stereotaxic surgery with rats of different sex, strain and weight,” J. Neurosci. Methods, 13, No. 2, 139–143 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. K. Han, S. H. Lee, H. J. Jeong, et al., “Analgesic effects of intrathecal curcumin in the rat formalin test,” Korean. J. Pain, 25, No. 1, 1–6 (2012).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. E. Torres-Lopez, M. I. Ortiz, G. Castaneda-Hernandez, et al., “Comparison of the antinociceptive effect of celecoxib, diclofenac and resveratrol in the formalin test,” Life Sci., 70, No. 14, 1669–1676 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. A. Cockayne, S. G. Hamilton, Q. M. Zhu, et al., “Urinary bladder hyporeflexia and reduced pain-related behavior in P2X3-deficient mice,” Nature, 407, No. 6807, 1011–1015 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. M. Aloisi and I. Ceccarelli, “Role of gonadal hormones in formalin-induced pain responses of male rats: modulation by estradiol and naloxone administration,” Neuroscience, 95, No. 2, 559–566 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. C. Kao, X. Zhao, C. Y. Lee, et al., “Absence of μ opioid receptor mRNA expression in astrocytes and microglia of rat spinal cord, ” NeuroReport, 18, 378–384 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Bachynsky, P. McCracken, D. Lier, et al., “Propentofylline treatment for Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia: an economic evaluation based on functional abilities,” Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord, 14, 102–111 (2000).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Kittner, “Clinical trials of propentofylline in vascular dementia. European/Canadian propentofylline study group,” Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord, 13, No. 3, 166–171 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. M. Sweitzer, P. Schubert, J. A. DeLeo, “Propentofylline, a glial modulating agent, exhibits antiallodynic properties in a rat model of neuropathic pain,” J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 297, No. 3, 1210–1217 (2001).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Dorazil-Dudzik, J. Mika, M. K. Schafer, et al., “The effects of local pentoxifylline and propentofylline treatment on formalin-induced pain and tumor necrosis factor-alpha messenger RNA levels in the inflamed tissue of the rat paw,” Anesth. Analg., 98, No. 6, 1566–1573 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. D. Shields, D. J. Cavanaugh, H. Lee, et al., “Pain behavior in the formalin test persists after ablation of the great majority of C-fiber nociceptors,” Pain, 151, No. 2, 422–429 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Eisenberg, B. P. Vos, and A. M. Strassman, “The NMDA antagonist Memantine blocks pain behavior in a rat model of formalin-induced facial pain,” Pain, 54, No. 3, 301–307 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. Wiech, M. Ploner, and I. Tracey, “Neurocognitive aspects of pain perception,” Trends Cogn. Sci., 12, No. 8, 306–313 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Kong, P. C. Tu, C. Zyloney, et al., “Intrinsic functional connectivity of the periaqueductal gray, a resting fMRI study,” Behav. Brain Res., 211, No. 2, 215–219 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. P. Wunderlich, R. Klug, G. Stuber, et al., “Caudate nucleus and insular activation during a pain suppression paradigm comparing thermal and electrical stimulation,” Open Neuroimag J., 5, 1–8 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. R. Loyd and A. Z. Murphy, “The role of the periaqueductal gray in the modulation of pain in males and females: are the anatomy and physiology really that different?” Neural. Plast., 2009, 462879 (2009).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. Ying, N. Lu, Y. Q. Zhang, et al., “Involvement of spinal glia in tetanically sciatic stimulation-induced bilateral mechanical allodynia in rats,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 340, 1264–1272 (2006).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. L. Liang, J. L. Yang, N. Lu, et al., “Synergetic analgesia of propentofylline and electroacupuncture by interrupting spinal glial function in rats,” Neurochem. Res., 35, No. 11, 1780–1786 (2010).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. M. Sweitzer, P. Schubert, and J. A. DeLeo, “Propentofylline, a glial modulating agent, exhibits antiallodynic properties in a rat model of neuropathic pain,” J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 297, 1210–1217 (2001).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Cao and Y. Q. Zhang, “Spinal glial activation contributes to pathological pain states,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 32, 972–983 (2008).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    L. R. Watkins, E. D. Milligan, and S. F. Maier, “Glial activation: a driving force for pathological pain,” Trends Neurosci., 24, 450–455 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of Ministry of Health, Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of NeurobiologyZhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Luohe Medical CollegeLuoheChina

Personalised recommendations