We studied changes in the spatial parameters of receptive fields (RFs) of visually sensitive neurons in the associative area 21a of the cat cortex under conditions of presentation of moving visual stimuli. The results of experiments demonstrated that these parameters are dynamic and depend, from many aspects, on the pattern of the stimulus used for their estimation. Angular lengths of the horizontal and vertical axes of the RFs measured in the case of movement of the visual stimuli exceeded many times those determined by presentation of stationary blinking stimuli. As is supposed, a visual stimulus, when moving along the field of vision, activates a certain number of the neurons synaptically connected with the examined cell and possessing RFs localized along the movement trajectory. As a result, such integrated activity of the neuronal group can change the excitation threshold and discharge frequency of the studied neuron. It seems probable that correlated directed activation of the neuronal groups represents a significant neurophysiological mechanism providing dynamic modifications of the RF parameters of visually sensitive neurons in the course of processes of visual perception and identification of moving objects within the field of vision.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. K. Hartline, “The response of single optic nerve fibers of the vertebrate eye to illumination of the retina,” Am. J. Physiol., 121, 400–415 (1938).
H. K. Hartline, “The receptive field of optic nerve fiber,” Am. J. Physiol., 130, 690–699 (1940).
D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, “Integrative action in the cat’s lateral geniculate body,” J. Physiol., 155, 385–398 (1961).
D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, “Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat visual cortex,” J. Physiol., 160, 106–154 (1962).
D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel, “Receptive fields and functional architecture in two non-striate areas (18 and 19) of the cat,” J. Neurophysiol., 28, 229–289 (1965).
J. T. McIlwain, “Receptive fields of optic tract axons and lateral geniculate cells: periphery extent and barbiturate sensitivity,” J. Neurophysiol., 27, 1154–1173 (1964).
J. Xing and G. J. Gerstein, “Networks with lateral connectivity: II. Development of neural grouping and corresponding receptive field changes,” J. Neurophysiol., 75, 184–189 (1996).
J. Xing and G. J. Gerstein, “Networks with lateral connectivity: I. Dynamic properties mediated by the balance of intrinsic excitation and inhibition,” J. Neurophysiol., 75, 200–216 (1996).
H. Yao and C. Y. Li, “Clustered organization of neurons with similar extra receptive field properties in the primary visual cortex,” Neuron, 25, 547–553 (2002).
B. A. Olhausen and D. T. Field, “Sparse coding of sensory inputs,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 14, 481–487 (2004).
D. T. Field and E. T. Chichilinski, “Information processing in the primate retina: circuitry and coding,” Am. Rev. Neurosci., 30, 1–30 (2007).
L. Galli, T. Chalupa, T. Mattei, and S. Bisti, “The organization of receptive fields in area 18 neurons of the cat varies with the spatiotemporal characteristics of the visual stimulus,” Exp. Brain Res., 71, 1–7 (1988).
M. W. Pettet and C. D. Gilbert, “Dynamic changes in receptive fields size in cat primary visual cortex,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 8366–8370 (1992).
C. D. Gilbert and T. N. Wiesel, “Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex,” Nature, 356, 150–152 (1992).
B. T. Malone, V. R. Kumar, and D. L. Ringach, “Dynamics of receptive fields size in primary visual cortex,” J. Neurophysiol., 97, 407–414 (2007).
B. Zernicki, “Pretrigeminal cat: a review,” Brain Res., 9, 1–14 (1986).
P. O. Bishop, W. Kozak, and G. I. Vakkur, “Some quantitative aspects of the cat’s eye: axis and plain reference, visual field coordinates and optics,” J. Physiol., 163, 466–502 (1962).
R. Fernald and R. Chase, “An improved method for plotting retinal landmarks and focusing the eyes,” Vis. Res., 11, 95–96 (1971).
P. O. Bishop, J. S. Coombs, and G. H. Henry, “Responses to visual contours: spatiotemporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurons,” J. Physiol., 219, 625–657 (1971).
H. B. Barlow, R. Fitzhugh, and S. Kuffler, “Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat’s retina during adaptation,” J. Physiol., 137, 338–354 (1957).
D. Rose, “Responses of single units in cat visual cortex to moving bars of light as a function of bar length,” J. Physiol., 271, 1–23 (1977).
U. Polat and D. Sagi, “The architecture of perceptual interactions,” Vis. Res., 34, 73–78 (1994).
B. A. Harutiunian-Kozak, A. B. Sharanbekian, A. L. Kazarian, et al., “Spatial summation processes in the receptive fields of visually driven neurons of the cat’s cortical area 21a,” Arch. Ital. Biol., 144, 127–144 (2006).
D. K. Khachvankyan, J. A. Kozak, G. G. Grigoryan, et al., “Spatial organization of receptive fields and dynamic peculiarities of neurons of the extrastriate area 21a of the cat cerebral cortex,” Neurophysiology, 40, No. 2, 105–114 (2008).
K. Dec, W. T. Waleszcyk, A. Wrobel, and B. A. Harutiunian-Kozak, “The spatial infrastructure of visual receptive field in the cat’s superior colliculus,” Arch. Ital. Biol., 139, 337–356 (2001).
M. Steriade, “The flash-evoked afterdischarge,” Brain Res., 9, 169–212 (1968).
M. Carandini and D. Ferster, “Membrane potential and firing rate in cat primary visual cortex,” J. Neurosci., 20, 470 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 213-224, May-June, 2010.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harutiunian-Kozak, B.A., Khachvankyan, D.K., Grigoryan, G.G. et al. Dynamic Spatial Organization of Receptive Fields of Neurons in the 21a Cortical Area. Neurophysiology 42, 175–184 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-010-9148-2
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11062-010-9148-2