, Volume 99, Issue 3, pp 493–504 | Cite as

Stretching the Sooth: Use, Overuse, and the Consolation of Sooth in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde

  • Laura Clark


The purpose of this article is to closely examine the ways in which the three main characters of Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde use the word sooth. Through this examination, it becomes apparent that their respective uses of that word define them as characters and present the potential for misinterpretation which produces tension for both the characters in the text and the readers of the text. Chaucer seeks to alleviate that tension through Troilus’s soliloquy on divine foreknowledge and human free will, and its conclusion offers consolation to both Troilus and Chaucer’s own audience.


Chaucer Troilus and Criseyde Sooth Trouthe 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boynton, O. (2010). The trouthe/routhe rhyme in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde. Chaucer Review, 45(2), 222–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaucer, G. (1987). Troilus and Criseyde. In Larry. D.␣Benson (Ed.), The Riverside Chaucer (3rd ed., pp.␣473–585). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  3. Diekstra, F. (1983). The language of equivocation: Some Chaucerian techniques. Dutch Quarterly Review of Anglo-American Letters, 11(4), 267–277.Google Scholar
  4. Donaldson, E. T. (1970). Speaking of Chaucer. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Green, R. F. (1999). A crisis of truth: Literature and law in Ricardian England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ross, V. A. (1997). Believing Cassandra: Intertextual politics and the interpretation of dreams in ‘Troilus and Criseyde’. Chaucer Review, 31(4), 339–356.Google Scholar
  7. Shimonomoto, K.(Ed.) (2001). The modes of speech and thought presentation in Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde. In The use of ye and thou in the Canterbury Tales, and collected articles (pp. 64–71). Gifu-shi, Japan.Google Scholar
  8. “Sooth, n.” Middle English Dictionary. 2001–2014, online version September 2014. Web. 23 Sep 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Stokes, M. (1983). Wordes White: Disingenuity in Troilus and Cristeyde. English Studies, 64, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sundwall, M. (1975). Deiphobus and Helen: A tantalizing hint. Modern Philology, 73(2), 151-156.Google Scholar
  11. Virgil. Aeneid. (2005). Trans. Stanley Lombardo. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baylor UniversityDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations