, Volume 99, Issue 1, pp 151–166 | Cite as

The Date and Intellectual Milieu of the Early Middle English Vices and Virtues

  • Stephen Pelle


One of the least understood texts written during the transition from Old to Middle English is Vices and Virtues, a religious dialogue surviving in London, British Library, Stowe 34 (s. xiii1/4). Several scholars have shown from linguistic evidence that the work was probably composed in Eastern or Southeastern England sometime in the second half of the twelfth century, but its literary and intellectual context has received little attention. The present article identifies sources for two passages of Vices and Virtues in the Anselmian De similitudinibus and Hugh of St Victor’s (d. 1141) De sacramentis Christiane fidei. The second passage also has an important vernacular analogue in a French sermon by Maurice de Sully (d. 1196). Finally, a third passage is compared with close parallels from John of Salisbury’s (d. 1180) Policraticus and a few later texts. The sources and analogues identified here represent some of the most important clues to the work’s date so far discovered, and may allow us to assign the original composition of Vices and Virtues to the last third of the twelfth century. More significantly, these related texts help to situate more precisely the dialogue’s anonymous author within the intellectual landscape of post-Conquest England. The Vices and Virtues author’s knowledge and adaptation of the works of contemporary Latin theologians provides evidence of the vibrancy and utility of English religious prose in the late twelfth century.


Early Middle English Vices and Virtues Anselm of Canterbury Hugh of St Victor Maurice de Sully John of Salisbury 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, W. (1980). The source text of Sawles Warde. Manuscripta, 24, 44–48.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, W. (1984). The literary treatment of the pseudo-Anselmian dialogue De custodia interioris hominis in England and France. Classica et mediaevalia, 35, 215–233.Google Scholar
  3. Berndt, R. (Ed.). (2008). Hugonis de Sancto Victore De sacramentis Christiane fidei. Corpus Victorinum: Textus Historici 1. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
  4. Bethurum, D. (Ed.). (1957). The homilies of Wulfstan. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  5. Biffi, I., Granata, A., Marabelli, C., & Riserbato, D. (Eds.). (2008). Anselmo d’Aosta nel ricordo dei discepoli: parabole, dette, miracoli. Milan: Jaca book.Google Scholar
  6. Boutry, M. (Ed.). (2004). Petri Cantoris Summa quae dicitur Verbum adbreuiatum (textus conflatus). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaeualis 196. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  7. Boutry, M. (Ed.). (2012a). Petri Cantoris Summa quae dicitur Verbum adbreuiatum (textus prior). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaeualis 196A. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  8. Boutry, M. (Ed.). (2012b). Petri Cantoris Summa quae dicitur Verbum adbreuiatum (textus alter). Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaeualis 196B. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  9. Catalogue of the Stowe Manuscripts in the British Museum. (1895–96). 2 vols. London: British Museum.Google Scholar
  10. Châtillon, J. (1948). Le contenu, l’authenticité et la date du Liber exceptionum et des Sermones centum de Richard de Saint-Victor. Revue du Moyen Âge latin, 4, 23–52; 343–366.Google Scholar
  11. Châtillon, J. (Ed.). (1958). Liber exceptionum: texte critique avec introduction, notes et tables. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
  12. Crawford, J. M. (Ed.). (1986). Vices and Virtues: re-edited from British Library MS Stowe 34. Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
  13. Dickins, B., & Wilson, R. M. (Eds.). (1951). Early Middle English texts. London: Bowes & Bowes.Google Scholar
  14. Ehlers, J. (1991). Hugo v. St-Victor. Lexikon des Mittelalters, vol. V (cols. 177–78). Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  15. Faulkner, M. (2011). Archaism, belatedness and modernisation: ‘Old’ English in the twelfth century. The Review of English Studies, ns, 63, 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faulkner, M. (2012). Rewriting English literary history 1042–1215. Literature Compass, 9, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer, B. (Ed.). (1951–54). Genesis. Vetus Latina: die Reste der altlateinischen Bibel, vol. II. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  18. Forbes, H. F. (2010). Diuiduntur in quattuor: The interim and judgement in Anglo-Saxon England. The Journal of Theological Studies, ns, 61, 659–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gatelais, S., & Toupin, F. (2012). The Kentish Sermons as evidence of thirteenth-century English and translation practice. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 113, 191–218.Google Scholar
  20. Girolimon, M. T. (1994). Hugh of St. Victor’s De sacramentis Christianae fidei: the sacraments of salvation. The Journal of Religious History, 18, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goering, J. (1992). William de Montibus (c. 11401213): the schools and the literature of pastoral care. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
  22. Gräbener, H.-J. (Ed.). (1965). Ars poetica: kritische Ausgabe. Forschungen zur romanischen Philologie 17. Münster (Westfalen): Aschendorff.Google Scholar
  23. Gunn, C. (2012). Vices and Virtues: a reassessment of manuscript Stowe 34. In R. G. Newhauser & S. J. Ridyard (Eds.), Sin in medieval and early modern culture: The tradition of the seven deadly sins (pp. 65–84). Woodbridge: York Medieval Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, J. (Ed.). (1920). Selections from early Middle English, 1130–1250. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  25. Hallik, S. (2007). Sententia und Proverbium: Begriffsgeschichte und Texttheorie in Antike und Mittelalter. Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar
  26. Heinzmann, R. (1967). Die “Institutiones in sacram paginam” des Simon von Tournai: Einleitung und Quästionenverzeichnis. Veröffentlichungen des Grabmann-Instituts: Neue Folge 1. Munich: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
  27. Henel, H. (1934). Studien zum altenglischen Computus. Beiträge zur englischen Philologie 26. Leipzig: B. Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
  28. Hilberg, I. (Ed.). (1996). Sancti Eusebii Hieronymi epistulae. Pars 1: epistulae ILXX (2nd ed.). Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum 54. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  29. Holthausen, F. (Ed.). (1888–1921). Vices and Virtues, being a soul’s confession of its sins with Reason’s description of the virtues: A Middle-English dialogue of about 1200 A.D. Early English Text Society os 89 and 159. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kabir, A. J. (2001). Paradise, death, and doomsday in Anglo-Saxon literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keats-Rohan, K. S. B. (Ed.). (1993). Ioannis Saresberiensis Policraticus: libri I–IV. Corpus Christianorum Continuatio Mediaeualis 118. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  32. Kleinman, S. (2013). Frið and grið: Laȝamon and the legal language of Wulfstan. In R. Allen, J. Roberts, & C. Weinberg (Eds.), Reading Laȝ amon’s Brut: approaches and explorations (pp. 391–417). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  33. Kurath, H., Kuhn, S. M., & Lewis, R. E. (Eds.). (1954–2001). Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  34. Laing, M. (1993). Catalogue of sources for a linguistic atlas of early Middle English. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  35. Le Goff, J. (1981). La naissance du purgatoire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  36. Longère, J. (1988). Les sermons latins de Maurice de Sully, évêque de Paris (†1196): contribution à l’histoire de la tradition manuscrite. Steenbrugge: Sint-Pietersabdij.Google Scholar
  37. Luscombe, D. (2004). Salisbury, John of (late 1110s–1180). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/ref:odnb/14849. Accessed 1 May 2014.
  38. Manitius, M. (1931). Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters: dritter Band, vom Ausbruch des Kirchenstreites bis zum Ende des 12. Jahrhunderts. Beck: Munich.Google Scholar
  39. Meyerhoff, E. (1913). Die Verbalflexion in den “Vices and Virtues.” Doctoral dissertation: University of Kiel.Google Scholar
  40. Millett, B. (2005). The discontinuity of English prose: Structural innovation in the Trinity and Lambeth homilies. In A. Oizumi, J. Fisiak, & J. Scahill (Eds.), Text and language in medieval English prose: a Festschrift for Tadao Kubouchi (pp. 129–150). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  41. Millett, B. (2007). The pastoral context of the Lambeth and Trinity homilies. In W. Scase (Ed.), Essays in manuscript geography: vernacular manuscripts of the English West Midlands from the Conquest to the sixteenth century (pp. 43–64). Turnout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  42. Millett, B. (2010). Change and continuity: The English sermon before 1250. In E. Treharne & G. Walker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of medieval literature in English (pp. 221–239). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Morrison, S. (1995). A reminiscence of Wulfstan in the twelfth century. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 96, 229–234.Google Scholar
  44. Morsbach, L. (1896). Mittelenglische Grammatik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  45. Pelle, S. (2012). Continuity and renewal in English homiletic eschatology, ca. 1150–1200. Doctoral dissertation: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  46. Peppermüller, R. (1993). Petrus Cantor. Lexikon des Mittelalters, vol. VI (cols. 1965–66). Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  47. Philipssen, M. (1911). Die Deklination in den “Vices and Virtues.” Doctoral dissertation: University of Kiel.Google Scholar
  48. Robson, C. A. (Ed.). (1952). Maurice of Sully and the medieval vernacular homily, with the text of Maurice’s French homilies from a Sens Cathedral Chapter manuscript. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Sanford, E. M. (1943). The Verbum abbreviatum of Petrus Cantor. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 74, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schmidt, G. (1899). Ueber die Sprache und Heimat der “Vices and Virtues”: ein Beitrag zur mittelenglischen Dialektkunde. Doctoral dissertation: University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
  51. Southern, R. W., & Schmitt, F. S. (Eds.). (1969). Memorials of St. Anselm. Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Spieralska, B. (2007). Les sermons ad populum de Maurice de Sully et leur adaptation française. Przegląd Tomistyczny, 13(1), 9–112.Google Scholar
  53. Swan, M. (2007a). Mobile libraries: Old English manuscript production in Worcester and the West Midlands, 1090–1215. In W. Scase (Ed.), Essays in manuscript geography: vernacular manuscripts of the English West Midlands from the Conquest to the sixteenth century (pp. 29–42). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  54. Swan, M. (2007b). Preaching past the Conquest: Lambeth Palace 487 and Cotton Vespasian A. xxii. In A. Kleist (Ed.), The Old English homily: Precedent, practice, and appropriation (pp. 403–23). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, N. (2002). “Hit segð on halgum bocum”: The logic of composite Old English homilies. Philological Quarterly, 81, 383–419.Google Scholar
  56. Treharne, E. (2012). Living through conquest: the politics of early English, 1020–1220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Tristram, H. (1995). Early insular preaching: verbal artistry and method of composition. Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-historischen Klasse 623/Veröffentlichungen der Keltischen Kommission 11. Vienna: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  58. Utley, F. L. (1972). Dialogues, debates, and catechisms. In A. E. Hartung (Ed.), A manual of the writings in Middle English, 1050–1500 (Vol. III, pp. 669–745). New Haven: Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
  59. Wilson, R. M. (1968). Early Middle English literature (3rd ed.). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  60. Zeeman, E. (1956). Continuity in Middle English devotional prose. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 55, 417–422.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval StudiesTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations