Advertisement

Neophilologus

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 161–176 | Cite as

The Minds Behind the Mask: Reading for Character in the Masquerade

  • Karin Kukkonen
Article

Abstract

This article reassesses the masquerade trope as a catalyst for the development of characterisation in the eighteenth-century novel. The mask and costume not only protect one’s social identity from scrutiny and thereby enable subversion, as Terry Castle has argued. They also screen the mental worlds of those involved in the intrigues and revels. The masking of one’s intentions engenders struggles of cognitive superiority and embodied disorientation, and thereby the masquerade contributes to textual strategies of characterisation. Spotlight analyses of the masquerade scenes in Eliza Haywood’s The Masqueraders, Daniel Defoe’s Roxana, Henry Fielding’s Tom Jones and Amelia, and Frances Burney’s Cecilia show how the trope gives rise to textually rich encounters between fictional minds and their experience of the fictional world. By giving an occasion for mental struggles and cognitive complexities, the masquerade works as a catalyst of characterisation—it pushes characters from type to individual, and thereby forms part of a historical shift in narrative technique.

Keywords

Masquerade Fictional minds Narratology Cognitive approaches to literature Eighteenth-century novel Characterisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azim, F. (1993). The colonial rise of the novel. London: Rutledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballaster, R. (1992). Seductive forms: Women’s amatory fiction 1684–1740. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benedict, B. M. (1993). Curiosity: A cultural history of early modern inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bolens, G. (2008). Le style des gestes: CorporÉitÉ et kinÉsie dans le rÉcit littÉraire. Éditions BHMS: Lausanne.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L. (1993). Ends of empire: Women and ideology in early modern England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burney F. (1782/2008). P. Sabor, & M. A. Doody (Eds.) Cecilia, or, memoirs of an heiress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. (1995). Natural masques: Gender and identity in Fielding’s plays and novels. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Castle, T. (1986). Masquerade and civilization: The carnivalesque in eighteenth-century English culture and fiction. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  11. Colombetti, G. (2010). Enaction, sense-making and emotion. In J. Steward, O. Gapenne, & E. DiPaolo (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 145–164). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Craft-Fairchild, C. (1993). Masquerade and gender: Disguise and female identity in eighteenth-century fictions by women. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Damasio, A. (2006). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  14. Defoe, D. (1724/2008). J. Mullan (Ed.) Roxana: The fortunate mistress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fielding, H. (1749/2008). J. Bender, & S. Stern (Eds.) Tom Jones. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fielding, H (1751/1987). D. Blewett (Ed.) Amelia. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Fielding, H. (1972). An essay on the knowledge of the characters of men. In H. K. Miller (Ed.), Miscellanies (Vol. 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fishelov, D. (1990). Types of character, characteristics of types. In Style, 24.3, pp. 422–439.Google Scholar
  19. Flesch, W. (2007). Comeuppance: Costly signalling, altruistic punishment, and other biological components of fiction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Flynn, C. H. (1990). The body in Swift and Defoe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, L. (2002). Character’s theater: Genre and identity on the eighteenth-century English stage. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gallagher, C. (1994). Nobody’s story: The vanishing acts of women writers in the marketplace, 1670–1820. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, P. (2000). The work of the imagination. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Haywood, E. (1724). The masquerades. Or, fatal curiosity. London: ECCO. Accessed 16 April 2012.Google Scholar
  25. Haywood, E. (1744–1746/2001). The female spectator. Book I. In A. Pettit (Ed.), The selected works of Eliza Haywood, Vol. 2 (pp. 17–51). London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
  26. Hunter, J. P. (1975). Occasional form: Henry Fielding and the chains of circumstance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jannidis, F. (1996).’Individuum est ineffabile’ Zur Veränderung der Individualitätssemantik im 18. Jahrhundert und ihrer Auswirkung auf die Figurenkonzeption im Roman. Aufklärung, 9.2, pp. 77–110.Google Scholar
  28. Jannidis, F. (2004). Figur und Person. Beitrag zur historischen Narratologie. Berlin: deGruyter.Google Scholar
  29. Jannidis, F. (2011). Character. In P. Hühn et al. The living handbook of narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. Web. Accessed 16 April 2012.Google Scholar
  30. King, K. (1998). Spying upon the conjurer: Haywood, curiosity and the novel in the 1720s. Studies in the novel (Summer), pp. 172–193.Google Scholar
  31. Kramnick, J. (2011). Against literary Darwinism. Critical inquiry, 37.2, pp. 315–347.Google Scholar
  32. Kukkonen, K. (forthcoming). Flouting figures: Uncooperative narration in the fiction of Eliza Haywood. Language and Literature.Google Scholar
  33. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of theory of mind. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leverage, P., Mancing, H., & Schweikert, R. (Eds.). (2011). Theory of mind and literature. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lubey, K. (2006). Eliza Haywood’s amatory aesthetic. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 39(3), 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynch, D. (1998). The economy of character: Novels, market culture, and the business of inner meaning. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Margolin, U. (1983). Characterization in narrative. Some theoretical prolegoma. Neophilologus, 67(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKeon, M. (2000). Prose fiction: Great Britain. In M. McKeon (Ed.), Theory of the novel: A Historical Approach (pp. 600–612). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Oatley, K., Jenkins, J. M., & Stein, N. L. (2000). “History and culture” Human emotions: A reader. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Palmer, A. (2002). Fictional minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  41. Perrault, C. (1668/2003). H. Tronc (Ed.) Contes. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  42. Prince, G. (1982). Narratology: The form and function of narrative (p. 1982). Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schofield, M. A. (1990). Masking and unmasking the female mind: Disguising romances in feminine fiction, 1713–1799. Newark, London: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  45. Veblen, T. (1994). The theory of the leisure class. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  46. Vermeule, B. (2010). Machiavellian narratives. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), Introduction to cognitive cultural studies (pp. 214–229). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wahrman, D. (2004). The making of the modern self: Identity and culture in eighteenth-century England. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Watt, I. (1963). The rise of the novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  49. Whiten, A. (1999). Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis. In R. A. Wilson & F. Keil (Eds.), MIT encyclopedia of cognitive sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zahavi, A., Zahavi, A., et al. (1999). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zunshine, L. (2007). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Zunshine, L. (2011). Theory of mind and fictions of embodied transparency. In P. Leverage, et al. (Eds.), Theory of mind and literature (pp. 63–91). West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Zwaan, R., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations