, Volume 95, Issue 4, pp 543–556 | Cite as

Performing Violence in Rotrou’s Theater



Violence has a significant and varied role in the theater of Jean Rotrou. Discord and strife are natural to the stage and violence is one of the ways such conflict may be expressed. The inherently spectacular nature of violence makes it particularly theatrical. At the same time, violence pleasingly tantalizes audiences. In this examination of Rotrou’s entire theatrical corpus, I first consider the use of “real” violence, both on stage and off. More interesting and even more common is potential violence, which includes threats of all sorts, as well as fortuitous interruptions. Potential violence avoids the serious difficulties that staging “real” violence entails; furthermore it opens the door to theatricality, as threats may be mere poses. Rotrou’s most innovative use of violence is to make of it a conscious performance on the part of his characters. Violence is thus tied to the performance of insanity, to cross-dressing, and to his fanfarons, among other elements. Finally Rotrou’s masterpiece, Le Véritable Saint Genest, reproduces the two levels of agency of violence—the playwright and his characters—while adding a third level, that of the violence represented, recounted, or threatened in the embedded play performed by Genest’s troupe. From a basic building block of dramatic spectacle and plot, Rotrou constructs a reflection on the nature of theatrical illusion.


Rotrou Violence Threats Performance Theater 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baby, H. (2001). La tragi-comédie de Corneille à Quinault. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
  2. Baby, H. (2007). Le capitan dans la comédie et la tragi-comédie françaises (1630–1640): Les enseignements génériques d’un type. Littératures classiques, 63, 71–84.Google Scholar
  3. Berregard, S. (2006). Le spectacle de la mort et le problème des bienséances dans L’hypocondriaque ou le mort amoureux et LHercule mourant de Rotrou. PFSCL, 33(64), 193–206.Google Scholar
  4. Berregard, S. (2007). La mixité des genres dramatiques dans le théâtre de Rotrou. Littératures classiques, 63, 97–106.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, P. (1959). Classicisme et baroque dans l’œuvre de Racine. Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
  6. Cavaillé, J.-P. (1988). Les trois grâces du comédien: théâtre, politique et théologie dans Le véritable saint Genest. French Review, 61, 703–714.Google Scholar
  7. Charron, D. (1982). Recherches sur les métaphors dans le théâtre de Jean Rotrou. Dissertation, Université de Nancy II.Google Scholar
  8. Ekstein, N. (2009). The conversion of Polyeucte’s Félix. French Forum, 34(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gethner, P. (2003). A baroque guilt trip: False death announcements in Rotrou. Cahiers du dix-septième, 8(1), 58–67.Google Scholar
  10. Girard, R. (1972). La Violence et le sacré. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
  11. Graver, D. (1995). Violent theatricality: Displayed enactments of aggression and pain. Theatre Journal, 47(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guichemerre, R. (1981). La tragi-comédie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  13. Guichemerre, R. (1993). Violence et sexualité dans les tragi-comédies de Rotrou. In E. Mosele (Ed.), Dalla tragedia rinascimentale alla tragicommedia barocca (pp. 283–294). Fasano: Schena.Google Scholar
  14. Hémon, F. (1906). Rotrou et son œuvre. In F. Hémon (Ed.), Théâtre Choisi de Jean Rotrou (pp. 1–78). Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
  15. Hubert, J. D. (1958). Le réel et l’illusoire dans le théâtre de Corneille et dans celui de Rotrou. Revue des Sciences Humaines, 91, 333–350.Google Scholar
  16. Lancaster, H. C. (1966). A history of French dramatic literature in the seventeenth century. 5 pts. New York: Gordian Press.Google Scholar
  17. Louvat-Molozay, B. (2007). La tragédie de Rotrou au carrefour des genres dramatiques. Littératures classiques, 63, 61–70.Google Scholar
  18. Morel, J. (1968). Rotrou dramaturge de l’ambiguïté. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
  19. Orlando, F. (1963). Rotrou dalla tragicommedia alla tragedia. Torino: Bottega d’Erasmo.Google Scholar
  20. Pasquier, P. (2001). Introduction. In P. Pasquier (Ed.), Le véritable saint Genest (pp. 159–250). Paris: Société des textes français modernes.Google Scholar
  21. Scherer, J. (1956). La dramaturgie classique en France. Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
  22. Seznec, A. (1972). Le Saint-Genest de Rotrou: un plaidoyer pour le théâtre. Romanic Review, 63, 171–189.Google Scholar
  23. Vuillemin, J.-C. (1994). Baroquisme et théâtralité; Le théâtre de Jean Rotrou. Tübingen: Biblio 17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Modern Languages and LiteraturesTrinity UniversitySan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations