Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative predictive factors affecting return to work in patients with gliomas undergoing awake brain mapping

  • Clinical Study
  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the preoperative predictive factors affecting return to work in patients with gliomas in the left cerebral hemisphere undergoing awake surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive glioma patients who underwent awake surgery from January 2012 to July 2017. Adult patients older than 18 years, who reported working prior to surgery, were recruited for this study.

Results

Comparing sociodemographic, disease-related and preoperative neurocognitive variables of glioma patients who returned to work and those who did not, binomial logistic regression models for preoperative predictors affecting return to work revealed significant differences in age and sole breadwinner status as sociodemographic variables, tumour volume as a disease-related variable, and Verbal IQ, Performance IQ, general memory, attention/concentration, and working memory as neurocognitive variables. Multivariate logistic regression models demonstrated that the independent factors associated with propriety of returning to work 1 year after surgery was the sociodemographic variable sole breadwinner status (yes vs no; OR = 15.00, 95% CI 2.22–101.35, p = 0.01), the disease-related variable tumour volume (per 1 cm3; OR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.96–0.99, p = 0.04), and the preoperative neurocognitive variable general memory (≥ 100 vs < 100; OR = 21.70, 95% CI 2.60–183.94, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that three predictive factors including sole breadwinner status, tumour volume and general memory that can be assessed in the preoperative stage substantially contribute to returning to work in patients with gliomas in the left cerebral hemisphere, 1 year after awake surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith JS, Chang EF, Lamborn KR, Chang SM, Prados MD, Cha S, Tihan T, Vandenberg S, McDermott MW, Berger MS (2008) Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas. J Clin Oncol 26:1338–1345. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanai N, Berger MS (2008) Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery 62:753–764. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf (discussion 264–756)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jakola AS, Myrmel KS, Kloster R, Torp SH, Lindal S, Unsgard G, Solheim O (2012) Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. JAMA 308:1881–1888. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.12807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jakola AS, Skjulsvik AJ, Myrmel KS, Sjavik K, Unsgard G, Torp SH, Aaberg K, Berg T, Dai HY, Johnsen K, Kloster R, Solheim O (2017) Surgical resection versus watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. Ann Oncol 28:1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Roelz R, Strohmaier D, Jabbarli R, Kraeutle R, Egger K, Coenen VA, Weyerbrock A, Reinacher PC (2016) Residual tumor volume as best outcome predictor in low grade glioma—a nine-years near-randomized survey of surgery vs biopsy. Sci Rep 6:32286. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanai N, Polley MY, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Berger MS (2011) An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas. J Neurosurg 115:3–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.JNS10998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duffau H (2018) Is non-awake surgery for supratentorial adult low-grade glioma treatment still feasible? Neurosurg Rev 41:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0918-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Motomura K, Chalise L, Ohka F, Aoki K, Tanahashi K, Hirano M, Nishikawa T, Yamaguchi J, Shimizu H, Wakabayashi T, Natsume A (2019) Neurocognitive and functional outcomes in patients with diffuse frontal lower-grade gliomas undergoing intraoperative awake brain mapping. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.3.JNS19211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Duffau H, Peggy Gatignol ST, Mandonnet E, Capelle L, Taillandier L (2008) Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping of language pathways in a consecutive series of 115 patients with Grade II glioma in the left dominant hemisphere. J Neurosurg 109:461–471. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/9/0461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Luca CR, Conroy R, McCarthy MC, Anderson VA, Ashley DM (2009) Neuropsychological impact of treatment of brain tumors. Cancer Treat Res 150:277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/b109924_17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, Etschmaier M, Steiner JF (2005) A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Psychooncology 14:992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasmussen DM, Elverdam B (2008) The meaning of work and working life after cancer: an interview study. Psychooncology 17:1232–1238. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Endo M, Haruyama Y, Takahashi M, Nishiura C, Kojimahara N, Yamaguchi N (2016) Returning to work after sick leave due to cancer: a 365-day cohort study of Japanese cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 10:320–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0478-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito N, Takahashi M, Sairenchi T, Muto T (2014) The impact of breast cancer on employment among Japanese women. J Occup Health 56:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.13-0140-oa

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takahashi M, Tsuchiya M, Horio Y, Funazaki H, Aogi K, Miyauchi K, Arai Y (2018) Job resignation after cancer diagnosis among working survivors in Japan: timing, reasons and change of information needs over time. Jpn J Clin Oncol 48:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyx143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Feuerstein M, Hansen JA, Calvio LC, Johnson L, Ronquillo JG (2007) Work productivity in brain tumor survivors. J Occup Environ Med 49:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318095a458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu W, Wang D, Zheng X, Ou Q, Huang L (2018) Sex-dependent association of preoperative hematologic markers with glioma grade and progression. J Neurooncol 137:279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2714-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Starnoni D, Berthiller J, Idriceanu TM, Meyronet D, d'Hombres A, Ducray F, Guyotat J (2018) Returning to work after multimodal treatment in glioblastoma patients. Neurosurg Focus 44:E17. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.3.FOCUS1819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffermann M, Bruckmann L, Mahdy Ali K, Zaar K, Avian A, von Campe G (2017) Pre- and postoperative neurocognitive deficits in brain tumor patients assessed by a computer based screening test. J Clin Neurosci 36:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.10.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M, Initiative S (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 18:805–835. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Minami U, Nishi M, Fukaya T, Hasebe M, Nonaka K, Koike T, Suzuki H, Murayama Y, Uchida H, Fujiwara Y (2015) Effects of the change in working status on the health of older people in Japan. PLoS ONE 10:e0144069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Motomura K, Fujii M, Maesawa S, Kuramitsu S, Natsume A, Wakabayashi T (2014) Association of dorsal inferior frontooccipital fasciculus fibers in the deep parietal lobe with both reading and writing processes: a brain mapping study. J Neurosurg 121:142–148. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.JNS131234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iijima K, Motomura K, Chalise L, Hirano M, Natsume A, Wakabayashi T (2017) Efficacy of the transtemporal approach with awake brain mapping to reach the dominant posteromedial temporal lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-3035-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Motomura K, Natsume A, Iijima K, Kuramitsu S, Fujii M, Yamamoto T, Maesawa S, Sugiura J, Wakabayashi T (2017) Surgical benefits of combined awake craniotomy and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for gliomas associated with eloquent areas. J Neurosurg 127:790–797. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.JNS16152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Motomura K, Chalise L, Ohka F, Aoki K, Tanahashi K, Hirano M, Nishikawa T, Wakabayashi T, Natsume A (2018) Supratotal resection of diffuse frontal lower grade gliomas with awake brain mapping, preserving motor, language, and neurocognitive functions. World Neurosurg 119:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Motomura K, Terasawa Y, Natsume A, Iijima K, Chalise L, Sugiura J, Yamamoto H, Koyama K, Wakabayashi T, Umeda S (2019) Anterior insular cortex stimulation and its effects on emotion recognition. Brain Struct Funct 224:2167–2181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01895-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chesley N, Flood S (2017) Signs of change? At-home and breadwinner parents' housework and child-care time. J Marriage Fam 79:511–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fukushima N, Kitabayashi M, Kikuchi H, Sasai H, Oka K, Nakata Y, Tanaka S, Inoue S (2018) Comparison of accelerometer-measured sedentary behavior, and light- and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity in white- and blue-collar workers in a Japanese manufacturing plant. J Occup Health 60:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.2017-0276-OA

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R (2007) Implementation of fiber tract navigation. Neurosurgery 61:306–317. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000279224.83998.7d (discussion 317–308)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wechsler D (1987) Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised manual. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mu YG, Huang LJ, Li SY, Ke C, Chen Y, Jin Y, Chen ZP (2012) Working memory and the identification of facial expression in patients with left frontal glioma. Neuro Oncol 14(Suppl 4):81–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor MC (2005) Qualitative research in health care. McGraw-Hill Education, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kallio H, Pietila AM, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M (2016) Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs 72:2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Johannes CB, Crawford SL, McKinlay JB (1997) Interviewer effects in a cohort study. Results from the Massachusetts Women's Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 146:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Collins C, Gehrke A, Feuerstein M (2013) Cognitive tasks challenging brain tumor survivors at work. J Occup Environ Med 55:1426–1430. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a64206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cote D, Coutu MF (2010) A critical review of gender issues in understanding prolonged disability related to musculoskeletal pain: how are they relevant to rehabilitation? Disabil Rehabil 32:87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dolan A (2011) 'You can't ask for a Dubonnet and lemonade!': working class masculinity and men's health practices. Sociol Health Illn 33:586–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01300.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gempt J, Lange N, Bette S, Foreman SC, Cammardella JH, Albertshauser J, Gradtke C, Buchmann N, Ryang YM, Schmidt-Graf F, Meyer B, Ringel F (2017) Factors influencing neurocognitive function in patients with neuroepithelial tumors. Sci Rep 7:17764. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17833-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Tucha O, Smely C, Preier M, Lange KW (2000) Cognitive deficits before treatment among patients with brain tumors. Neurosurgery 47:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200008000-00011 (discussion 333–324)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hendrix P, Hans E, Griessenauer CJ, Simgen A, Oertel J, Karbach J (2017) Neurocognitive status in patients with newly-diagnosed brain tumors in good neurological condition: the impact of tumor type, volume, and location. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 156:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.03.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wechsler D (1997) WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs. Junko Sugiura, Mr. Hiroyasu Yamamoto, Mr. Kyohei Koyama, and Mr. Yasuyuki Matsui (Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan) for their wonderful technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuya Motomura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) to K.M. (Grant No. 17K10862) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). We have no conflict of interest to declare for this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, A., Motomura, K., Natsume, A. et al. Preoperative predictive factors affecting return to work in patients with gliomas undergoing awake brain mapping. J Neurooncol 146, 195–205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03371-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03371-0

Keywords

Navigation